Radiation pneumonitis after concurrent aumolertinib and thoracic radiotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The superior efficacy of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has been proven in locally advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, the high incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) reduced by concurrent TRT and TKIs has attracted widespread attention. Thus, this study was designed to investigate the rate and risk factors for RP in EGFR-positive NSCLC patients simultaneously treated with aumolertinib and TRT. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated stage IIIA-IVB NSCLC patients treated with concurrent aumolertinib and TRT between May 2020 and December 2022 at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong, China. RP was diagnosed by two senior radiologists and then graded from 1 to 5 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. All risk factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included, the incidence of grade ≥ 2 RP was 42.9%. Grade 2 and 3 RP were observed in 28.6% and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Grade 4 to 5 RP were not observed. the gross total volume (GTV) ≥ 21 ml and ipsilateral lung V20 ≥ 25% were risk factors for RP. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in the first-line therapy group and second-line therapy group were 23.5 months and 17.2 months, respectively (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Better local control is achieved with concurrent TRT and aumolertinib, and special attention should be given to controlling ipsilateral lung V20 and GTV to reduce the risk of RP.

Endostar acts as a pneumonitis protectant in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: CCRT is presently the standard treatment for LA-NSCLC. RP is one of the main obstacles to the completion of thoracic radiation therapy, resulting in limited survival benefits in NSCLC patients. This research aims to explore the role of Endostar in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP and clinical curative effect in LA-NSCLC patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with stage III NSCLC who received CCRT from December 2008 to December 2017, or Endostar intravenous drip concurrently with chemoradiotherapy (Endostar + CCRT group). Standard toxicity of the pneumonitis endpoint was also collected by CTCAE V5.0. We further summarized other available studies on the role of Endostar in the prognosis of NSCLC patients and the incidence of RP. RESULTS: There were 76 cases in the CCRT group and 46 cases in the CCRT+ Endostar group. In the CCRT+ Endostar group, the occurrence of grade ≥2 RP in patients with V20Gy ≥25% was significantly higher than that in patients with V20Gy < 25% (p = 0.001). In the cohorts with V20Gy < 25%, 0 cases of 29 patients treated with Endostar developed grade ≥2 RP was lower than in the CCRT group (p = 0.026). The re-analysis of data from other available studies indicated that Endostar plus CCRT could be more efficient and safely in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP with LA-NSCLC. CONCLUSIONS: When receiving CCRT for LA-NSCLC patients, simultaneous combination of Endostar is recommended to enhance clinical benefit and reduce pulmonary toxicity.

Assessment of radiation pneumonitis and predictive factors in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a dose-limiting toxicity associated with increased mortality for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This study aims to assess the incidence of symptomatic RP (grade 2-5), rate of recovery and associated predictive factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective population-based study including 602 patients with NSCLC who were treated with CRT between 2002 and 2016. RP and rate of recovery were analysed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to analyse potential predictive factors for the two endpoints RP grade ≥ 2 and RP grade ≥ 3. RESULTS: A total of 136 (23%) patients developed symptomatic RP and 37 (6%) developed RP grade ≥ 3. A total of 67 (71%) recovered, whereas the remaining 27 (29%), with the major proportion of patients belonging to the RP grade ≥ 3 group, suffered from prevailing sequelae. On multivariable analysis, the selected model for predicting RP grade ≥ 2 included the factors V20, smoking status, average fractions per week and chemotherapy agent. V20 and age were selected factors for RP grade ≥ 3. INTERPRETATION: The results suggest that regardless of all proposed factors predictive for RP, the most important influenceable significant factor still is dose to the lung. The main aim should be to avoid RP grade ≥ 3, where a substantial proportion of patients suffer from prevailing sequalae. Consequently, the technical improvement and precision of radiotherapy delivery should continue to focus on lung sparing techniques also in the ongoing immunotherapy-containing schedules where the risk of pneumonitis may be increased. e factor still is dose to the lung. Consequently, the technical improvement and precision of radiotherapy delivery should continue to focus on lung sparing techniques also in the ongoing immunotherapy-containing schedules where the risk of pneumonitis may be increased.

A comparison of the incidence of ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer treated with durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been increasingly used as a new radiation modality for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The risk factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP) during consolidation durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using IMRT have not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed medical record data from consecutive patients diagnosed with NSCLC who underwent CCRT and consolidation durvalumab at our institution between April 2018 and September 2022. Since we adopted IMRT for the treatment of NSCLC in April 2020, these patients were categorized into two groups: those treated with IMRT after April 2020 and those treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) before April 2020. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients underwent IMRT (the IMRT group), while 25 patients underwent 3D-CRT (the 3D-CRT group). In both groups, the total dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The cumulative incidence of ≥ grade 2 RP at 12 months was significantly lower in the IMRT group than in the 3D-CRT group (27.0% vs. 64.0%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.338, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.144-0.793, p = 0.013). In the multivariable analysis, V20 (≥ 25.6%, HR: 2.706, 95% CI: 1.168-6.269, p = 0.020) and radiotherapy technique (IMRT, HR: 0.414, 95% CI: 0.172-0.994, p = 0.048) were identified as significant risk factors for ≥ grade 2 RP. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT is associated with a lower rate of ≥ grade 2 RP in patients with NSCLC who received CCRT followed by durvalumab.

A dynamic nomogram predicting symptomatic pneumonia in patients with lung cancer receiving thoracic radiation.

PURPOSE: The most common and potentially fatal side effect of thoracic radiation therapy is radiation pneumonitis (RP). Due to the lack of effective treatments, predicting radiation pneumonitis is crucial. This study aimed to develop a dynamic nomogram to accurately predict symptomatic pneumonitis (RP ≥ 2) following thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer patients. METHODS: Data from patients with pathologically diagnosed lung cancer at the Zhongshan People's Hospital Department of Radiotherapy for Thoracic Cancer between January 2017 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors for radiation pneumonitis were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis and utilized to construct a dynamic nomogram. The predictive performance of the nomogram was validated using a bootstrapped concordance index and calibration plots. RESULTS: Age, smoking index, chemotherapy, and whole lung V5/MLD were identified as significant factors contributing to the accurate prediction of symptomatic pneumonitis. A dynamic nomogram for symptomatic pneumonitis was developed using these risk factors. The area under the curve was 0.89(95% confidence interval 0.83-0.95). The nomogram demonstrated a concordance index of 0.89(95% confidence interval 0.82-0.95) and was well calibrated. Furthermore, the threshold values for high- risk and low- risk were determined to be 154 using the receiver operating curve. CONCLUSIONS: The developed dynamic nomogram offers an accurate and convenient tool for clinical application in predicting the risk of symptomatic pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracic radiation.

Systematic risk analysis of radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer: role of cotreatment with chemo-, endocrine, and targeted therapy.

PURPOSE: A major complication of sequential and concomitant chemoradiation in breast cancer treatment is interstitial pneumonitis induced by radiation therapy (RT), systemic therapy, or a combination of both. Dose and volume of co-irradiated lung tissue directly correlate with the risk of radiation pneumonitis. Especially in case of combined treatment, it is often unclear which of the used therapeutic agents promote pneumonitis. METHODS: This was a prospective monocentric study including 396 breast cancer patients. A systematic analysis of single and combined therapeutic measures was performed in order to identify treatment-related factors enhancing the risk of pneumonitis post RT. RESULTS: Overall incidence of pneumonitis of any grade was 38%; 28% were asymptomatic (grade 1) and 10% were symptomatic (> grade 1). Pneumonitis > grade 2 did not occur. Beside age, smoking status, and mean lung dose, the combined treatment with goserelin and tamoxifen significantly enhanced the risk of pneumonitis in a supra-additive pattern (odds ratio [OR] 4.38), whereas each agent alone or combined with other drugs only nonsignificantly contributed to a higher pneumonitis incidence post RT (OR 1.52 and OR 1.16, respectively). None of the other systemic treatments, including taxanes, increased radiation pneumonitis risk in sequential chemoradiation. CONCLUSION: Common treatment schedules in sequential chemoradiation following breast-conserving surgery only moderately increase lung toxicity, mainly as an asymptomatic complication, or to a minor extent, as transient pneumonitis ≤ grade 2. However, combined treatment with tamoxifen and the LHRH analog goserelin significantly increased the risk of pneumonitis in breast cancer patients after chemoradiation. Thus, closer surveillance of involved patients is advisable.

Risk factor analysis of the development of severe radiation pneumonitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative radiotherapy, with focus on underlying pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: We aim to identify the multifaceted risk factors that can affect the development of severe radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with curative high-dose radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 175 patients with stage-I-III NSCLC treated with curative thoracic X-ray radiotherapy at the Korea University Guro Hospital between June 2019 and June 2022. Treatment-related complications were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03). RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 15 months (range: 3-47 months). Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) as an underlying lung disease (P < 0.001) and clinical stage, regarded as the concurrent use of chemotherapy (P = 0.009), were associated with a high rate of severe RP. In multivariate analyses adjusting confounding variables, the presence of IPF as an underlying disease was significantly associated with severe RP (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 48.4 [9.09-347]; P < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis of stage-I-II NSCLC, the incidence of severe RP in the control, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and IPF groups was 3.2%, 4.3%, and 42.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The incidence of severe RP was 15.2%, 10.7%, and 75.0% in the control, COPD, and IPF groups, respectively (P < 0.001) in the stage-III NSCLC group. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that IPF as an underlying lung disease and the concurrent use of chemotherapy are associated with a high rate of severe RP. In contrast, COPD did not increase the risk of pulmonary toxicity after receiving curative high-dose radiotherapy.

Analysis of the risk factors of radiation pneumonitis and the predictive ability of dosiomics in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Purpose: This prospective study investigated the incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) after immunotherapy followed by radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer, analyzed the risk factors for RP, and explored the predictive performance of dosimetry and dosiomics. Methods & materials: Risk factors for grade ≥2 RP were calculated by using a logistic regression model. Predictive performance was compared on the basis of area under the curve values. Results: Grade ≥2 RP occurred in 16 cases (26.7%). The AUC values of V5 Gy, gray-level dependence matrix-small dependence high gray-level emphasis (GLDM-SDHGLE) and combined features were 0.685, 0.724 and 0.734, respectively. Conclusion: Smoking history, bilateral lung V5 Gy and GLDM-SDHGLE were independent risk factors for RP. Dosiomics can effectively predict RP.

[Radiation-induced pneumonitis : pathophysiology, risk factors and work-up in 2022]. / Pneumopathies radiques - Pathophysiologie, classification, facteurs de risque et prise en charge en 2022.

Despite technical improvements concerning lung irradiation modalities, radiation-induced pneumonitis remains a usual complication, notably in the field of lung cancer treatment. This complication may remain asymptomatic but can also lead to respiratory distress. Thus, a low degree of suspicion and a comprehensive work-up is mandatory to evaluate the indication for specific treatment. In this article, we discuss the hypothesized pathophysiologic pathways, risk factors, clinical/radiological presentation and management.

Malgré les améliorations des techniques d'irradiation à l'étage thoracique, la pneumopathie radique (PpR) reste une complication fréquente, en particulier dans le cadre du traitement du cancer pulmonaire. Cette complication, qu'elle soit précoce ou tardive, peut demeurer silencieuse ou causer une détresse respiratoire potentiellement fatale. C'est pourquoi un faible degré de suspicion est nécessaire, de manière à débuter précocement un bilan d'investigation et décider de l'indication à un traitement spécifique. Dans cet article, nous discutons des hypothèses pathophysiologiques qui sous-tendent la PpR, des facteurs de risque de survenue, de la présentation clinique et radiologique, ainsi que de sa prise en charge.

Effects of diabetes on the development of radiation pneumonitis.

Radiation pneumonia (RP) is a common adverse reaction to radiation therapy in patients with chest tumors. Recent studies have shown that diabetes mellitus (DM), which can cause systemic multisystem damage, specifically targets lungs, and the incidence of RP in patients with a history of diabetes is higher than that in other patients with tumors who have undergone radiotherapy. DM is an important risk factor for RP in tumor patients undergoing RT, and patients with DM should be treated with caution. This article reviews research on the clinical aspects, as well as the mechanism, of the effects of diabetes on RP and suggests future research needed to reduce RP.

A novel nomogram containing acute radiation esophagitis predicting radiation pneumonitis in thoracic cancer receiving radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) is a non-negligible and sometimes life-threatening complication among patients with thoracic radiation. We initially aimed to ascertain the predictive value of acute radiation-induced esophagitis (SARE, grade ≥ 2) to symptomatic RP (SRP, grade ≥ 2) among thoracic cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Based on that, we established a novel nomogram model to provide individualized risk assessment for SRP. METHODS: Thoracic cancer patients who were treated with thoracic radiation from Jan 2018 to Jan 2019 in Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were enrolled prospectively. All patients were followed up during and after radiotherapy (RT) to observe the development of esophagitis as well as pneumonitis. Variables were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model, and a nomogram model was established to predict SRP by "R" version 3.6.0. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients were enrolled (64 esophageal cancer, 57 lung cancer and 2 mediastinal cancer) in this study prospectively. RP grades of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 occurred in 29, 57, 31, 0, 3 and 3 patients, respectively. SRP appeared in 37 patients (30.1%). In univariate analysis, SARE was shown to be a significant predictive factor for SRP (P < 0.001), with the sensitivity 91.9% and the negative predictive value 93.5%. The incidence of SRP in different grades of ARE were as follows: Grade 0-1: 6.5%; Grade 2: 36.9%; Grade 3: 80.0%; Grade 4: 100%. Besides that, the dosimetric factors considering total lung mean dose, total lung V5, V20, ipsilateral lung mean dose, ipsilateral lung V5, and mean esophagus dose were correlated with SRP (all P < 0.05) by univariate analysis. The incidence of SRP was significantly higher in patients whose symptoms of RP appeared early. SARE, mean esophagus dose and ipsilateral mean lung dose were still significant in multivariate analysis, and they were included to build a predictive nomogram model for SRP. CONCLUSIONS: As an early index that can reflect the tissue's radiosensitivity visually, SARE can be used as a predictor for SRP in patients receiving thoracic radiation. And the nomogram containing SARE may be fully applied in future's clinical work.

Primary gross tumor volume is prognostic and suggests treatment in upper esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To aid clinicians strategizing treatment for upper esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), this retrospective study investigated associations between primary gross tumor volume (GTVp) and prognosis in patients given surgical resection, radiotherapy, or both resection and radiotherapy. METHODS: The population comprised 568 patients with upper ESCC given definitive treatment, including 238, 216, and 114 who underwent surgery, radiotherapy, or combined radiotherapy and surgery. GTVp as a continuous variable was entered into the multivariate Cox model using penalized splines (P-splines) to determine the optimal cutoff value. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust imbalanced characteristics among the treatment groups. RESULTS: P-spline regression revealed a dependence of patient outcomes on GTVp, with 30 cm3 being an optimal cut-off for differences in overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). GTVp ≥30 cm3 was a negative independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. PSM analyses confirmed the prognostic value of GTVp. For GTVp < 30 cm3, no significant survival differences were observed among the 3 treatments. For GTVp ≥30 cm3, the worst 5-year OS rate was experienced by those given surgery. The 5-year PFS rate of patients given combined radiotherapy and surgery was significantly better than that of patients given radiotherapy. The surgical complications of patients given the combined treatment were comparable to those who received surgery, but radiation side effects were significantly lower. CONCLUSION: GTVp is prognostic for OS and PFS in upper ESCC. For patients with GTVp ≥30 cm3, radiotherapy plus surgery was more effective than either treatment alone.

Construction and Verification of a Radiation Pneumonia Prediction Model Based on Multiple Parameters.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with lung cancer are at risk of radiation pneumonia (RP) after receiving radiotherapy. We established a prediction model according to the critical indicators extracted from radiation pneumonia patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 radiation pneumonia patients were involved in the training set. Firstly, the clinical data, hematological and radiation dose parameters of the 74 patients were screened by Logistics regression univariate analysis according to the level of radiation pneumonia. Next, Stepwise regression analysis was utilized to construct the regression model. Then, the influence of continuous variables on RP was tested by smoothing function. Finally, the model was externally verified by 30 patients in validation set and visualized by R code. RESULTS: In the training set, there was 40 patients suffered≥ level 2 acute radiation pneumonia. Clinical data (diabetes), blood indexes (lymphocyte percentage, basophil percentage, platelet count) and radiation dose (V15 > 40%, V20 > 30%, V35 >18%, V40 > 15%) were related to radiation pneumonia (P < 0.05). Particularly, stepwise regression analysis indicated that the history of diabetes, the basophils percentage, platelet count and V20 could be the best combination used for predicting radiation pneumonia. The column chart was obtained by fitting the regression model with the combined indicator. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the AUC in the development term was 0.853, the AUC was 0.656 in the validation term. And calibration curves of both groups showed the high stability in efficiently diagnostic. Furthermore, the DCA curve showed that the model had a satisfactory positive net benefit. CONCLUSION: The combination of the basophils percentage, platelet count and V20 is available to build a predictive model of radiation pneumonia for patients with advanced lung cancer.

Pneumonitis and fibrosis after breast cancer radiotherapy: occurrence and treatment-related predictors.

BACKGROUND: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) and radiation fibrosis (RF) are common side effects after breast cancer (BC) radiotherapy (RT). However, there is a great variation in the frequency of RP and RF. This study presents the occurrence of- and the treatment-related predictors for RP and RF. Further, physician- and patient-reported pulmonary symptoms during the first year after postoperative RT for BC are demonstrated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2008, 250 BC patients referred for postoperative RT were included in a prospective cohort study and followed during the first year after RT. High-resolution computed tomography of the lungs and symptom registration were performed before RT and 3, 6, and 12 months after RT. Patient-reported symptoms were registered by standard quality of life questionnaires. Logistic regression analyses were applied to estimate treatment-related predictors for radiological RP (rRP), clinical RP (cRP), radiological RF (rRF), and clinical RF (cRF). RESULTS: The occurrence of rRP and cRP at three months was 78% and 19%, while 12 months after RT rRF and cRF was 89% and 16%, respectively; all reported as grade 1. In multivariable analyses, mastectomy predicted cRP at three months (OR = 2.48, p = .03) and cRF at six months, ipsilateral lung volume receiving 20 Gray or more (V20), V30, and mean lung dose (MLD) predicted rRP at six months (OR = 1.06, p = .0003; OR = 1.10, p = .001; and OR = 1.03, p = .01, respectively). Endocrine treatment predicted cRF at 12 months (OR = 2.48, p = .02). Physicians reported significant more dyspnea at 3 months (p = .003) and patients reported 'a little dyspnea' more at 3 and 12 months compared to baseline (p = .007). CONCLUSION: RP and RF are prevalent in the first year after BC radiation. Mastectomy predicted cRP at three months. V20, V30, D25, and MLD predicted rRP at 6 months, and endocrine treatment predicted cRF at 12 months. Patients and physicians reported dyspnea differently.

Potential benefits of volumetric modulated arc therapy to reduce the incidence of ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis in radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of volumetric modulated arc therapy is gradually widespread for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify the factors that caused ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis and evaluate the impact of using volumetric modulated arc therapy on the incidence of ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis by comparing three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 124 patients who underwent radical radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in our institution between 2008 and 2019. The following variables were analysed to detect the factors that affected ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis; age, sex, the presence of interstitial lung disease, pulmonary emphysema, tumour location, stage, PTV/lung volume, lung V20Gy, total dose, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor, radiotherapy method. Radiation pneumonitis was evaluated using the common terminology criteria for adverse events (version 5.0). RESULTS: A total of 84 patients underwent three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT group) and 40 patients underwent volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT group). The cumulative incidence of ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis at 12 months was significantly lower in the VMAT group than in the 3D-CRT group (25% vs. 49.1%). The use of volumetric modulated arc therapy was a significant factor for ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis (HR:0.32, 95% CI: 0.15-0.65, P = 0.0017) in addition to lung V20Gy (≥ 24%, HR:5.72 (95% CI: 2.87-11.4), P < 0.0001) and total dose (≥ 70 Gy, HR:2.64 (95% CI: 1.39-5.03), P = 0.0031) even after adjustment by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We identified factors associated with ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis in radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Volumetric modulated arc therapy has potential benefits to reduce the risk of ≥ grade 2 radiation pneumonitis.

Modeling the risk of radiation pneumonitis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To develop and validate a nomogram for the prediction of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Clinical factors, dose-volume histogram parameters, and pulmonary function parameters were collected from 402 ESCC patients between 2010 and 2017, including 321 patients in the primary cohort and 81 in the validation cohort. The end-point was the occurrence of symptomatic RP (grade ≥ 2) within the first 12 months after radiotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to evaluate the predictive value of each factor for RP. A prediction model was generated in the primary cohort, which was internally validated to assess its performance. RESULTS: In the primary cohort, 31 patients (9.7%) experienced symptomatic RP. Based on logistic regression model, patients with larger planning target volumes (PTVs) or higher lung V20 had a higher predictive risk of RP, whereas the overall risk was substantially higher for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) than intensity-modulated radiotherapy. On multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors for RP were smoking history (P = 0.035), radiotherapy modality (P < 0.001), PTV (P = 0.039), and lung V20 (P < 0.001), which were incorporated into the nomogram. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram in the primary and validation cohorts were 0.772 and 0.900, respectively, which were superior to each predictor alone. CONCLUSIONS: Non-smoking status, 3DCRT, lung V20 (> 27.5%), and PTV (≥ 713.0 cc) were significantly associated with a higher risk of RP. A nomogram was built with satisfactory prediction ability.

Safety of thoracic radiotherapy in patients with prior immune-related adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and thoracic radiotherapy are increasingly used to treat advanced cancers. Despite data indicating exaggerated radiation toxicities in patients with autoimmune disease, the safety of thoracic radiotherapy in patients with prior ICI-associated immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is undefined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated from 2014 to 2020 with ICIs were queried for receipt of corticosteroids and radiotherapy. Patients who received thoracic radiation after symptomatic irAEs were assessed for ≥grade 2 radiation pneumonitis (RP). Characteristics predictive of RP were assessed using logistic regression and response relationships were modeled. RESULTS: Among 496 assessed patients, 41 with irAE history subsequently treated with thoracic radiotherapy were analyzed. Most irAEs were grade 2 (n = 21) and 3 (n = 19). Median time from irAE onset to radiotherapy was 8.1 months. Most patients received stereotactic body radiation therapy (n = 20) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (n = 18). In total, 25 patients (61%) developed ≥grade 2 RP at a median of 4 months from radiotherapy and 11 months from onset of irAEs. Three months from RP onset, 16 of 24 (67%) assessable patients had persistent symptoms. Among patients with prior ICI pneumonitis (n = 6), five patients (83%) developed ≥grade 2 RP (grade 2, n = 3; grade ≥3, n = 2). The mean lung radiation dose (MLD) predicted for RP (odds ratio: 1.60, P = 0.00002). The relationship between MLD and RP was strong (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.85) and showed an exaggerated dose-response. Among patients with an MLD >5 Gy (n = 26), 21 patients (81%) developed ≥grade 2 RP. CONCLUSION: This is the first study assessing the toxicity of radiotherapy among patients with prior irAEs from ICIs. Patients with prior irAEs were found to be at very high risk for clinically significant and persistent RP from thoracic radiotherapy. Careful consideration should be given to the possibility of an increased risk of RP, and close monitoring is recommended in these patients.

Thoracic radiotherapy plus Durvalumab in elderly and/or frail NSCLC stage III patients unfit for chemotherapy - employing optimized (hypofractionated) radiotherapy to foster durvalumab efficacy: study protocol of the TRADE-hypo trial.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic concepts. In particular, there is still a lack of treatment strategies for the group of elderly and frail patients, who are frequently not capable of receiving standard therapy regimens. Despite comprising the majority of lung cancer patients, this group is underrepresented in clinical trials. This applies also to elderly and frail patients suffering from unresectable stage III NSCLC, who are unfit for chemotherapy, and, therefore, cannot receive the standard therapy comprising of radiochemotherapy and the recently approved subsequent durvalumab consolidation therapy. These patients often receive radiotherapy only, which raises the concern of undertreatment. The TRADE-hypo trial aims at optimizing treatment of this patient group by combining radiotherapy with concomitant durvalumab administration, thereby employing the immune-promoting effects of radiotherapy, and determining safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this treatment. METHODS/ DESIGN: In this prospective phase II clinical trial, durvalumab therapy will be combined with either conventionally fractionated (CON-group) or hypofractionated (HYPO-group) thoracic radiotherapy. A safety stop-and-go lead-in phase will assess safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy with respect to severe pneumonitis in small patient cohorts before opening full enrollment. Tumor tissue, blood and stool samples will be collected before and during the study period to investigate the immunological mechanisms responsible for checkpoint inhibitor efficacy and immune-promoting effects of radiotherapy. DISCUSSION: Preclinical data suggests that irradiation-induced immunogenicity can be further increased if applied in a hypofractionated setting, potentially boosting the expected synergistic effect with immune checkpoint inhibition in restoring the immune anti-tumor response. If proven safe and efficient, a hypofractionated radiation schedule can provide a considerably more practicable option for the patient. Taking into consideration the intend to develop a combination treatment strategy that can be made available to patients soon after proving to be efficient and the potentially elevated toxicity of a hypofractionated radiotherapy approach, this trial was designed as a two-trials-in-one design. An accompanying translational research program is planned striving to gain insights into the tumor-host biology and to identify suitable biomarkers to predict therapy response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT04351256 . Registered 17 April 2020, Eudra-CT, 2019-002192-33 . Registered 24 October 2019.

A contemporary review of radiation pneumonitis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The current article reviews recent literature and summarizes the current understanding, diagnosis, risk, predictors, and management of radiation pneumonitis. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss the different parameters that contribute to radiation toxicity, the potential biomarkers that predict the risk, and mitigators of radiation pneumonitis. SUMMARY: Radiotherapy aims to provide care and a better quality of life in cancer patients however with complications. Radiation pneumonitis is important to recognize to appropriately plan and care for this population.

[The efficacy and safety of high dose versus standard dose radiotherapy in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].

Objective: To compare the efficacy and treatment-related toxicity of high dose versus standard dose radiotherapy in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: From 2005 to 2012, 183 pairs of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University were enrolled, all had undergone CCRT based on three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). A propensity score was constructed to match the cohort. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC) probability, as well as the acute and late toxicities between standard-dose and high-dose groups were compared. Results: Patients in the high-dose group had significantly better OS and LC probability compared with those in the standard-dose group: the 3-, 5- and 10-year LC rate were 60.9%, 57.6%, 52.3% versus 50.8%, 46.4%, 30.8%, respectively (P=0.032). The 3-, 5- and 10-year OS were 44.3%, 36.9% and 24.5% for high-dose group, and 31.7%, 20.6% and 14.1% for the standard-dose group, respectively(P=0.002). The incidence of acute radiation esophagitis (especially in grade 2 and 3) was 63.9% in high-dose group, which was significantly higher than that in the standard-dose group (59.6%). Severe (≥ grade 3) late-onset esophagitis was observed in neither group. The grade 4 acute esophagitis was rare. There was no significant difference in the incidence of radiation pneumonitis, gastrointestinal reactions or hematological toxicities between the two groups. Six patients in high-dose group and two patients in standard-dose group experienced ≥ grade 4 leukocytopenia, while no one experienced > grade 3 thrombocytopenia and anemia in both group. Conclusions: 60 Gy was the preferred dosage of CCRT in patients with ESCC. Compared with standard-dose, the high-dose CCRT yielded slightly increased mild to moderate acute radiation esophagitis, while life-threatening toxicities were not increased.