Obliteration of portal venules contributes to portal hypertension in biliary cirrhosis.

The effects of the obliteration of portal venules (OPV) in cirrhotic portal hypertension are poorly understood. To investigate its contribution to portal hypertension in biliary cirrhosis and its underlying mechanism, we evaluated OPV using two-dimensional (2D) histopathology in liver explants from patients with biliary atresia (BA, n = 63), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC, n = 18), and hepatitis B-related cirrhosis (Hep-B-cirrhosis, n = 35). Then, three-dimensional (3D) OPV was measured by X-ray phase-contrast CT in two parallel models in rats following bile duct ligation (BDL) or carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) administration, representing biliary cirrhosis and post-necrotic cirrhosis, respectively. The portal pressure was also measured in the two models. Finally, the effects of proliferative bile ducts on OPV were investigated. We found that OPV was significantly more frequent in patients with biliary cirrhosis, including BA (78.57 ± 16.45%) and PBC (60.00 ± 17.15%), than that in Hep-B-cirrhotic patients (29.43 ± 14.94%, p < 0.001). OPV occurred earlier, evidenced by the paired liver biopsy at a Kasai procedure (KP), and was irreversible even after a successful KP in the patients with BA. OPV was also significantly more frequent in the BDL models than in the CCl4 models, as shown by 2D and 3D quantitative analysis. Portal pressure was significantly higher in the BDL model than that in the CCl4 model. With the proliferation of bile ducts, portal venules were compressed and irreversibly occluded, contributing to the earlier and higher portal pressure in biliary cirrhosis. OPV, as a pre-sinusoidal component, plays a key role in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in biliary cirrhosis. The proliferated bile ducts and ductules gradually take up the 'territory' originally attributed to portal venules and compress the portal venules, which may lead to OPV in biliary cirrhosis. © 2024 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Prognostic performance of non-invasive tests for portal hypertension is comparable to that of hepatic venous pressure gradient.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-invasive tests to assess the probability of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) - including the ANTICIPATE±NASH models based on liver stiffness measurement and platelet count±BMI, and the von Willebrand factor antigen to platelet count ratio (VITRO) - have fundamentally changed the management of compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). However, their prognostic utility has not been compared head-to-head to the gold standard for prognostication in cACLD, i.e. the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). METHODS: Patients with cACLD (liver stiffness measurement ≥10 kPa) who underwent advanced characterization via same-day HVPG/non-invasive test assessment from 2007-2022 were retrospectively included. Long-term follow-up data on hepatic decompensation was recorded. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty patients with cACLD of varying etiologies, with a CSPH prevalence of 67.6%, were included. The cumulative incidence of hepatic decompensation at 1 and 2 years was 4.7% and 8.0%, respectively. HVPG, VITRO, and ANTICIPATE±NASH-CSPH-probability showed similar time-dependent prognostic value (AUROCs 0.683-0.811 at 1 year and 0.699-0.801 at 2 years). In competing risk analyses adjusted for MELD score and albumin, HVPG (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 1.099 [95% CI 1.054-1.150] per mmHg; p <0.001), or VITRO (aSHR 1.134 [95% CI 1.062-1.211] per unit; p <0.001), or ANTICIPATE±NASH-CSPH-probability (aSHR 1.232 [95% CI 1.094-1.387] per 10%; p <0.001) all predicted first decompensation during follow-up. Previously proposed cut-offs (HVPG ≥10 mmHg vs. <10 mmHg, VITRO ≥2.5 vs. <2.5, and ANTICIPATE-CSPH probability ≥60% vs. <60%) all accurately discriminated between patients at negligible risk and those at substantial risk of hepatic decompensation. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic performance of ANTICIPATE±NASH-CSPH-probability and VITRO is comparable to that of HVPG, supporting their utility for identifying patients who may benefit from medical therapies to prevent first hepatic decompensation. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Non-invasive tests have revolutionized the diagnosis and management of clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). However, limited data exists regarding the prognostic utility of non-invasive tests in direct comparison to the gold standard for prognostication in cACLD, i.e. the hepatic venous pressure gradient. In our study including 420 patients with cACLD, the ANTICIPATE±NASH model and VITRO yielded similar AUROCs to hepatic venous pressure gradient for hepatic decompensation within 1 to 2 years. Thus, non-invasive tests should be applied and updated in yearly intervals in clinical routine to identify patients at short-term risk, thereby identifying patients who may benefit from treatment aimed at preventing hepatic decompensation.

Metabolomics as a tool to predict the risk of decompensation or liver-related death in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with compensated cirrhosis with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH: HVPG > 10 mm Hg) have a high risk of decompensation. HVPG is, however, an invasive procedure not available in all centers. The present study aims to assess whether metabolomics can improve the capacity of clinical models in predicting clinical outcomes in these compensated patients. APPROACH AND RESULTS: This is a nested study from the PREDESCI cohort (an RCT of nonselective beta-blockers vs. placebo in 201 patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH), including 167 patients for whom a blood sample was collected. A targeted metabolomic serum analysis, using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, was performed. Metabolites underwent univariate time-to-event cox regression analysis. Top-ranked metabolites were selected using Log-Rank p -value to generate a stepwise cox model. Comparison between models was done using DeLong test. Eighty-two patients with CSPH were randomized to nonselective beta-blockers and 85 to placebo. Thirty-three patients developed the main endpoint (decompensation/liver-related death). The model, including HVPG, Child-Pugh, and treatment received ( HVPG/Clinical model ), had a C-index of 0.748 (CI95% 0.664-0.827). The addition of 2 metabolites, ceramide (d18:1/22:0) and methionine (HVPG/Clinical/Metabolite model), significantly improved the model's performance [C-index of 0.808 (CI95% 0.735-0.882); p =0.032]. The combination of these 2 metabolites together with Child-Pugh and the type of treatment received (Clinical/Metabolite model) had a C-index of 0.785 (CI95% 0.710-0.860), not significantly different from the HVPG-based models including or not metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH, metabolomics improves the capacity of clinical models and achieves similar predictive capacity than models including HVPG.

Combined Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt Embolization and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation for Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy.

This retrospective case series assessed the early effectiveness of combined spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) embolization and preemptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation for alleviation of medically refractory hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and prevention of portal hypertension complications in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eight patients with liver cirrhosis (5 men and 3 women; mean age, 61 years [SD ± 10]) and HE (overt [West-Haven Grade 2-4], n = 7; covert [West-Haven Grade 1], n = 1) refractory to lactulose and rifaximin therapy who underwent concurrent or staged SPSS embolization and TIPS creation between 2018 and 2022 were included in this study. The primary outcomes were 3-month improvement in HE and postprocedural HE-related hospitalizations. HE improvement was achieved in 7 (87.5%) of 8 cases. Among all patients, there was 1 HE-related hospitalization within 90 days that responded to repeat embolization with no further admissions. No patients developed new ascites, variceal hemorrhage, or other portal hypertension complications within 3 months.

Severity of Acute Portal Hypertension Determines the Clinical Outcomes in Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (SAH) presenting as acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has high mortality. Severe hepatic inflammation and ongoing hepatocellular cell death lead to rapid rise in portal pressure, a hyperdynamic circulation that might precipitate infections and organ failures. METHODS: Consecutive SAH patients were classified based on baseline HVPG measurement as 6to < 12 mmHg, 12to < 20 mmHg, and ≥ 20 mmHg. We analyzed portal hypertension severity in relation to fibrosis stage, ACLF at presentation, response to prednisolone, severity scores(MELD and Maddrey's Discriminant Function, mDF), and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 819 SAH patients (94.6% ACLF, 85.4% histological cirrhosis, median MELD and mDF scores 25 and 66, respectively), 250(30.5%) had HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg. Patients with HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg more often had large esophageal varices (25.2%vs.13.2%; p-0.001), higher baseline MELD (27.1 ± 5.6vs.25.3 ± 5.2; p-0.001), and mDF(76.1 ± 16vs.68.4 ± 15.1; p-0.01) scores. No patient without ACLF had HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg. Moreover, during hospital course these patients had higher incidence of variceal bleed (17.2%vs.8.8%; p-0.001), acute kidney injury (36.4%vs.25.3%; p-0.001), and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (6.4%vs.3.5%; p-0.05). Of 412(50.3%) eligible patients treated with prednisolone, 69.2% showed response at day 7(Lille's score < 0.45). 90-day mortality was 27.6%; and baseline MELD > 25.5[HR 1.78], HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg [HR 1.86], the presence of HE[HR 1.63], and prednisolone ineligibility due to sepsis[HR 1.27] were independent predictors. Mortality was unrelated to varices grade, variceal bleed, and histological cirrhosis. Repeat HVPG performed in 114(19.2%) patients after a median of 5.2 months showed significant decrease (3.6 mmHg; p-0.001) which correlated with improvement in MELD score(13points; p-0.05). CONCLUSION: Development of ACLF and complications in SAH are likely a result of acute rise in HVPG. "High-risk" SAH are SAH patients with HVPG ≥ 20 mmHg in the presence of ascites. Understanding the drivers for acute rise in portal pressure in SAH ACLF might help introduction of newer therapies.

Prospective, randomized, clinical trial on the effects of laparoscopic insufflation pressures on portal pressures in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: The adverse effects of intra-abdominal pressure from capnoperitoneum on cardiovascular and pulmonary systems have been well documented, but the effects on portal pressures in dogs with various insufflation pressures is poorly defined. The aim of the present study was to measure the effect of a range of insufflation pressures on the portal pressure, using direct pressure measurements in patients undergoing laparoscopy. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical randomized prospective study. ANIMALS: Nine client-owned dogs undergoing routine laparoscopy. METHODS: Two rounds of direct portal pressure assessments were performed, at insufflation pressures of 0, 6, 10, and 14 mmHg in a predetermined randomized sequence. The data were analyzed for effects of insufflation pressure, hemodynamic alterations, and round. A best-fit exponential model of the relationship between portal pressure and insufflation pressure was created. RESULTS: Portal pressure increased by 38% at 6 mmHg, 95% at 10 mmHg, and 175% at 14 mmHg compared to baseline. Portal pressure increased at an average rate of 7.45% per mmHg of insufflation pressure. Effects of weight, weight/insufflation pressure interaction, and round of insufflation were not statistically significant. No systemic hemodynamic adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Portal pressure increased as insufflation pressure increased. There was no clinically significant difference in baseline portal pressure between rounds of insufflation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This exponential model of portal pressure supports the use of the minimum insufflation pressure to allow visualization during laparoscopy. The return of portal pressure to baseline following desufflation supports the comparison of portal pressure measurements before and after laparoscopic shunt attenuation.

Hepatic hemodynamic study: More than just HVPG measurement.

Evaluation and staging of liver disease is essential in the clinical decision-making process of liver tumors. The severity of portal hypertension (PH) is the main prognostic factor in advanced liver disease. Performing an accurate hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement is not always possible, especially when veno-venous communications are present. In those complex cases, a refinement in HVPG measurement with a thorough evaluation of each of the components of PH is mandatory. We aimed at describing how some technical modifications and complementary procedures may contribute to an accurate and complete clinical evaluation to improve therapeutic decisions.

[HVPG minimally invasive era: exploration based on forearm venous approach].

Objective: The transjugular or transfemoral approach is used as a common method for hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement in current practice. This study aims to confirm the safety and effectiveness of measuring HVPG via the forearm venous approach. Methods: Prospective recruitment was conducted for patients with cirrhosis who underwent HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach at six hospitals in China and Japan from September 2020 to December 2020. Patients' clinical baseline information and HVPG measurement data were collected. The right median cubital vein or basilic vein approach for all enrolled patients was selected. The HVPG standard process was used to measure pressure. Research data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical software. Quantitative data were used to represent medians (interquartile ranges), while qualitative data were used to represent frequency and rates. The correlation between two sets of data was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. Results: A total of 43 cases were enrolled in this study. Of these, 41 (95.3%) successfully underwent HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach. None of the patients had any serious complications. The median operation time for HVPG detection via forearm vein was 18.0 minutes (12.3~38.8 minutes). This study confirmed that HVPG was positively closely related to Child-Pugh score (r = 0.47, P = 0.002), albumin-bilirubin score (r = 0.37, P = 0.001), Lok index (r = 0.36, P = 0.02), liver stiffness (r = 0.58, P = 0.01), and spleen stiffness (r = 0.77, P = 0.01), while negatively correlated with albumin (r = -0.42, P = 0.006). Conclusion: The results of this multi-centre retrospective study suggest that HVPG measurement via the forearm venous approach is safe and feasible.

Assessment of portal hypertension severity using machine learning models in patients with compensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In individuals with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD), the severity of portal hypertension (PH) determines the risk of decompensation. Invasive measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the diagnostic gold standard for PH. We evaluated the utility of machine learning models (MLMs) based on standard laboratory parameters to predict the severity of PH in individuals with cACLD. METHODS: A detailed laboratory workup of individuals with cACLD recruited from the Vienna cohort (NCT03267615) was utilised to predict clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e., HVPG ≥10 mmHg) and severe PH (i.e., HVPG ≥16 mmHg). The MLMs were then evaluated in individual external datasets and optimised in the merged cohort. RESULTS: Among 1,232 participants with cACLD, the prevalence of CSPH/severe PH was similar in the Vienna (n = 163, 67.4%/35.0%) and validation (n = 1,069, 70.3%/34.7%) cohorts. The MLMs were based on 3 (3P: platelet count, bilirubin, international normalised ratio) or 5 (5P: +cholinesterase, +gamma-glutamyl transferase, +activated partial thromboplastin time replacing international normalised ratio) laboratory parameters. The MLMs performed robustly in the Vienna cohort. 5P-MLM had the best AUCs for CSPH (0.813) and severe PH (0.887) and compared favourably to liver stiffness measurement (AUC: 0.808). Their performance in external validation datasets was heterogeneous (AUCs: 0.589-0.887). Training on the merged cohort optimised model performance for CSPH (AUCs for 3P and 5P: 0.775 and 0.789, respectively) and severe PH (0.737 and 0.828, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Internally trained MLMs reliably predicted PH severity in the Vienna cACLD cohort but exhibited heterogeneous results on external validation. The proposed 3P/5P online tool can reliably identify individuals with CSPH or severe PH, who are thus at risk of hepatic decompensation. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: We used machine learning models based on widely available laboratory parameters to develop a non-invasive model to predict the severity of portal hypertension in individuals with compensated cirrhosis, who currently require invasive measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient. We validated our findings in a large multicentre cohort of individuals with advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) of any cause. Finally, we provide a readily available online calculator, based on 3 (platelet count, bilirubin, international normalised ratio) or 5 (platelet count, bilirubin, activated partial thromboplastin time, gamma-glutamyltransferase, choline-esterase) widely available laboratory parameters, that clinicians can use to predict the likelihood of their patients with cACLD having clinically significant or severe portal hypertension.

5-MTHF enhances the portal pressure reduction achieved with propranolol in patients with cirrhosis: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: ß-blockers reduce hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) by decreasing portal inflow, with no reduction in intrahepatic vascular resistance. 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) can prevent oxidative loss of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), a cofactor for endothelial nitric oxide synthase coupling. It also converts homocysteine (tHcy) into methionine and enables the degradation of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an inhibitor of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 5-MTHF in combination with propranolol on HVPG and nitric oxide bioavailability markers in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. METHOD: Sixty patients with cirrhosis and HVPG ≥12 mmHg were randomized 1:1 to receive treatment with 5-MTHF+propranolol or placebo+propranolol for 90 days under double-blind conditions. HVPG and markers of nitric oxide bioavailability (BH4, ADMA and tHcy) were measured again at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Groups were similar in terms of baseline clinical and hemodynamic data and nitric oxide bioavailability markers. HVPG decreased in both groups, but the magnitude of the change was significantly greater in the group treated with 5-MTHF+propranolol compared to placebo+propranolol (percentage decrease, 20 [29-9] vs. 12.5 [22-0], p = 0.028), without differences in hepatic blood flow. At the end of treatment, 5-MTHF+propranolol (vs. placebo+propranolol) was associated with higher BH4 (1,101.4 ± 1,413.3 vs. 517.1 ± 242.8 pg/ml, p <0.001), lower ADMA (109.3 ± 52.7 vs. 139.9 ± 46.7 µmol/L, p = 0.027) and lower tHcy (µmol/L, 11.0 ± 4.6 vs. 15.4 ± 7.2 µmol/L, p = 0.010) plasma levels. CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, 5-MTHF administration significantly enhanced the HVPG reduction achieved with propranolol. This effect appears to be mediated by improved nitric oxide bioavailability in the hepatic microcirculation. CLINICAL TRIAL EUDRACT NUMBER: 2014-002018-21. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Currently, the pharmacological prevention of cirrhosis complications due to portal hypertension, such as esophageal varices rupture, is based on the use of ß-blockers, but some patients still present with acute variceal bleeding, mainly due to an insufficient reduction of portal pressure. In this study, we sought to demonstrate that the addition of folic acid to ß-blockers is more effective in reducing portal pressure than ß-blockers alone. This finding could represent the basis for validation studies in larger cohorts, which could impact the future prophylactic management of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Enhancing the benefit of ß-blockers with a safe, accessible, cost-effective drug could improve clinical outcomes in cirrhosis, which in turn could translate into a reduction in the rates and costs of hospitalization, and ultimately into improved survival.

Distinct structural and dynamic components of portal hypertension in different animal models and human liver disease etiologies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver fibrosis is the static and main (70%-80%) component of portal hypertension (PH). We investigated dynamic components of PH by a three-dimensional analysis based on correlation of hepatic collagen proportionate area (CPA) with portal pressure (PP) in animals or HVPG in patients. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Different animal models (bile duct ligation: n = 31, carbon tetrachloride: n = 12, thioacetamide: n = 12, choline-deficient high-fat diet: n = 12) and patients with a confirmed single etiology of cholestatic (primary biliary cholangitis/primary sclerosing cholangitis: n = 16), alcohol-associated (n = 22), and metabolic (NASH: n = 19) liver disease underwent CPA quantification on liver specimens/biopsies. Based on CPA-to-PP/HVPG correlation, potential dynamic components were identified in subgroups of animals/patients with lower-than-expected and higher-than-expected PP/HVPG. Dynamic PH components were validated in a patient cohort (n = 245) using liver stiffness measurement (LSM) instead of CPA. CPA significantly correlated with PP in animal models (Rho = 0.531; p < 0.001) and HVPG in patients (Rho = 0.439; p < 0.001). Correlation of CPA with PP/HVPG varied across different animal models and etiologies in patients. In models, severity of hyperdynamic circulation and specific fibrosis pattern (portal fibrosis: p = 0.02; septa width: p = 0.03) were associated with PH severity. In patients, hyperdynamic circulation (p = 0.04), vascular dysfunction/angiogenesis (VWF-Ag: p = 0.03; soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1: p = 0.03), and bile acids (p = 0.04) were dynamic modulators of PH. The LSM-HVPG validation cohort confirmed these and also indicated IL-6 (p = 0.008) and hyaluronic acid (HA: p < 0.001) as dynamic PH components. CONCLUSIONS: The relative contribution of "static" fibrosis on PH severity varies by type of liver injury. Next to hyperdynamic circulation, increased bile acids, VWF-Ag, IL-6, and HA seem to indicate a pronounced dynamic component of PH in patients.

Non-invasive candidate protein signature predicts hepatic venous pressure gradient reduction in cirrhotic patients after sustained virologic response.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the most accurate marker for assessing the severity of portal hypertension and the effectiveness of intervention treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic potential of blood-based proteomic biomarkers in predicting HVPG response amongst cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension due to Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and had achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). METHODS: The study comprised 59 patients from two cohorts. Patients underwent paired HVPG (pretreatment and after SVR), liver stiffness (LSM), and enhanced liver fibrosis scores (ELF) measurements, as well as proteomics-based profiling on serum samples using SomaScan® at baseline (BL) and after SVR (EOS). Machine learning with feature selection (Caret, Random Forest and RPART) methods were performed to determine the proteins capable of classifying HVPG responders. Model performance was evaluated using AUROC (pROC R package). RESULTS: Patients were stratified by a change in HVPG (EOS vs. BL) into responders (greater than 20% decline in HVPG from BL, or <10 mmHg at EOS with >10 mmHg at BL) and non-responders. LSM and ELF decreased markedly after SVR but did not correlate with HVPG response. SomaScan (SomaLogic, Inc., Boulder, CO) analysis revealed a substantial shift in the peripheral proteome composition, reflected by 82 significantly differentially abundant proteins. Twelve proteins accurately distinguished responders from non-responders, with an AUROC of .86, sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 83%, accuracy of 83%, PPV of 83%, and NPV of 83%. CONCLUSIONS: A combined non-invasive soluble protein signature was identified, capable of accurately predicting HVPG response in HCV liver cirrhosis patients after achieving SVR.

Serum concentration of taurochenodeoxycholic acid predicts clinically significant portal hypertension.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Severity of portal hypertension is usually quantified by measuring the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG). However, due to its invasiveness, alternative markers are being sought. Bile acids (BA), being synthesized, metabolized, and transported by the liver, seem to have the potential to serve as endogenous markers. The aim of the present study was to determine whether serum BA reflect the severity of portal hypertension. METHODS: We correlated serum concentrations of individual BA with portal pressure (as HVPG) in an exploratory cohort of 21 cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. The predictive potential of selected candidates was then confirmed in an independent validation cohort (n = 214). Additionally, nine previously published noninvasive markers were added to the stepwise logistic regression model to identify the most relevant ones, which were eventually used to create a prognostic index of portal hypertension. RESULTS: Serum levels of taurochenodeoxycholic acid (TCDCA) significantly correlated with HVPG and showed a high potential to predict clinically significant portal hypertension (HVPG ≥ 10 mm Hg: AUROC = 0.97 ± 0.06). This was confirmed in the validation cohort (AUROC = 0.96 ± 0.01). The predictive index (constructed based on AST/ALT, spleen diameter, and TCDCA concentration) was able to distinguish clinically significant portal hypertension with 95% sensitivity and 76% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: TCDCA seems to be a promising noninvasive marker of clinically significant portal hypertension. Its predictive potential may be further enhanced when it is combined with both the AST/ALT ratio and spleen diameter.

Portal pressure is of significant prognostic value in primary biliary cholangitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In other forms of chronic liver disease, measurement of portal pressure is of prognostic value, but this has not yet been established in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). The aim of the study is to determine the prognostic value of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) in relation to liver-related survival outcomes, as well as to the development of hepatic decompensation, oesophageal varices and variceal bleeding. METHODS: Baseline HVPG and liver biopsies were obtained in 86 patients followed for 10 years in a controlled trial of colchicine treatment, and subsequently in a long-term observational cohort study for a further 30 years. RESULTS: There were 49 Hepatic deaths in addition to 10 Liver Transplants (Hepatic death/transplant; n = 59). Some of these were associated with a significant variceal bleed within 3 months of death or transplant (Portal hypertension-associated death or transplant; n = 19). There were 63 deaths from all causes. During follow-up, oesophageal varices developed in 26 patients, whilst 17 bled from varices and 32 developed hepatic decompensation over a median follow-up of 18.1 years (1.9-28.5). Baseline HVPG was highly predictive of all 6 clinical outcomes and contributed significant predictive information additional to that provided by Mayo score and Ludwig stage. CONCLUSION: Measurement of baseline portal pressure is of significant prognostic value in primary biliary cholangitis.

Endovascular Assessment of Liver Hemodynamics in Patients with Cirrhosis Complicated by Portal Hypertension.

The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is currently considered the gold standard to assess portal hypertension (PH) in patients with cirrhosis. A meticulous technique is important to achieve accurate and reproducible results, and values obtained during measurement are applied in risk stratification of patients with PH, allocating treatment options, monitoring follow-up, and deciding management options in surgical patients. The use of portosystemic pressure gradients in patients undergoing placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts has been studied extensively and has great influence on decisions on shunt diameter. The purpose of this study was to describe the recommended technique to measure HVPG and portosystemic pressure gradient and to review the existing literature describing the importance of these hemodynamic measurements in clinical practice.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Perfusion Imaging and Elastography.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for assessing the degree of portal hypertension (PH), but it is not suitable for routine clinical use. The recently developed ultrasonography techniques, dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (D-CEUS) and liver stiffness (LS), have expanded the possibilities for noninvasive evaluation. AIMS: To investigate the usefulness of D-CEUS and elastographic parameters in assessing the presence and degree of PH. METHODS: This is a prospective monocentric study. Patients with liver cirrhosis referred for HVPG measurements underwent hepatic Doppler ultrasound, LS measurement, and D-CEUS with a second-generation contrast agent. Pearson's correlation and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to assess the role of noninvasive findings in predicting clinically significant PH (CSPH) and severe PH (SPH). RESULTS: 46 consecutive patients (31 men; mean age±SD: 57±11 years) were enrolled. A significant positive correlation was noted between LS and HVPG (r = 0.809, p<0.0001) with an area under the ROC curve of 0.923. A cut-off value of 24.2 kPa best predicted CSPH with a positive predictive value of 85%. Among the D-CEUS features, the area under the ROC curves of liver parenchyma peak intensity (PI-LP) was greater than the other indices both for CSPH and SPH (1.000 and 0.981, respectively). A PI-LP under 23.3 arbitrary units indicated the presence of CSPH with a sensitivity and a specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION: A multimodal ultrasound approach based on D-CEUS and LS might become a reliable predictor of CSPH and SPH and a useful alternative to HVPG.

Close Relationship between Systemic Arterial and Portal Venous Pressure in an Animal Model with Healthy Liver.

It is unclear to what extent systemic arterial blood pressure influences portal pressure. This relationship is clinically important as drugs, which are conventionally used for therapy of portal hypertension, may also influence systemic arterial blood pressure. This study investigated the potential correlation between mean arterial (MAP) and portal venous pressure (PVP) in rats with healthy livers. In a rat model with healthy livers, we investigated the effect of manipulation of MAP on PVP. Interventions consisted of 0.9% NaCl (group 1), 0.1 mg/kg body weight (bw) Sildenafil (low dose), an inhibitor of phosphodiesterase-5 (group 2), and 1.0 mg/kg bw Sildenafil (high dose, group 3) in 600 µL saline injected intravenously. Norepinephrine was used to increase MAP in animals with circulatory failure while PVP was monitored. Injection of the fluids induced a transient drop in MAP and PVP, probably due to a reversible cardiac decompensation. The drop in MAP and drop in PVP are significantly correlated. The time lag between change in MAP and change in PVP by 24 s in all groups suggests a cause-and-effect relationship. Ten minutes after the injection of the fluid, cardiac function was normalized. Thereafter, MAP gradually decreased. In the NaCl group, PVP decreases by 0.485% for a 1% drop of MAP, by 0.550% in the low-dose sildenafil group, and by 0.651% in the high-dose sildenafil group (p < 0.05 for difference group two vs. group one, group three vs. group one, and group three vs. group two). These data suggest that Sildenafil has an inherent effect on portal pressure that exceeds the effect of MAP. Injection of norepinephrine led to a sudden increase in MAP followed by an increase in PVP after a time lag. These data show a close relationship between portal venous pressure and systemic arterial pressure in this animal model with healthy livers. A change in MAP is consequently followed by a change in PVP after a distinct time lag. This study, furthermore, suggests that Sildenafil influences portal pressure. Further studies should be performed in a model with cirrhotic livers, as these may be important in the evaluation of vasoactive drugs (e.g., PDE-5-inhibitors) for therapy of portal hypertension.

[Consensus on clinical application of hepatic venous pressure gradient in China (2023 edition)].

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH). To further standardize the application of HVPG measurement, the Chinese Portal Hypertension Alliance (CHESS) and the Minimally Invasive Interventional Collaboration Group of the Chinese Society of Gastroenterology have updated the "Consensus on clinical application of hepatic venous pressure gradient in China (2023 edition)". This consensus provides 10 recommendations, with the aim of effectively promoting standardized measurement and the regulated application of HVPG in the field of cirrhotic portal hypertension in China.

Hepatic venous pressure gradient evaluates the Scheuer stage of liver fibrosis by transjugular liver biopsy: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the criterion for assessing sinusoidal portal hypertension. Using HVPG to assess the degree of liver fibrosis by transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) is still being explored, as no data has been shown that portal hypertension may already be present in patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis (Scheuer stage ≥ S3). The objective of this study was to observe whether portal hypertension exists before progressing to cirrhosis (Scheuer stage = S4). METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent TJLB and HVPG were enrolled. The correlation between Scheuer stage and HVPG was analyzed using the Pearson correlation coefficient, and the ROC curve predicted the diagnostic value of HVPG in patients with hepatic fibrosis. RESULTS: The Scheuer stage and HVPG significantly correlated (r = 0.654, p < 0.001). The AUC of HVPG in predicting advanced liver fibrosis was 0.896, and of cirrhosis was 0.810. There were 45 patients with portal hypertension (HVPG> 5 mmHg), 12 with S3, 29 with S4; There were 42 patients with CSPH (HVPG≥ 10 mmHg), 11 with S3, and 29 with S4. CONCLUSION: HVPG is valuable in evaluating the Scheuer stage of liver fibrosis in patients with TJLB. Portal hypertension might already exist before the progression to cirrhosis in some patients.

Portal hypertension has no role in perioperative bleeding during liver transplantation with systematic porto-caval shunt.

BACKGROUND: More than a half of patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) receive intraoperative transfusion. Portal hypertension (PHT) may contribute to perioperative blood loss. We study the relationship between preoperative hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) values and intraoperative transfusion requirements in adult patients undergoing LT. METHODS: 160 cirrhotic patients undergoing first elective LT (2009-2019) with an HVPG measurement within the previous 6 months were included. Surgical technique was piggyback with portocaval shunt (PCS). The association of HVPG and other variables with transfusion requirements and blood loss were studied. RESULTS: Blood loss (ml/kg) was positively correlated with HVPG, among other variables, but at multivariable analysis it only remained associated with MELD-Na and HCC indication. Regarding RBC transfusion, MELD-Na and hemoglobin were independently associated with the need and magnitude of RBC transfusion. Subanalysis by surgical stage (hepatectomy, anhepatic, neohepatic) and by serial HVPG cut-offs found no clear associations with either bleeding or transfusion. DISCUSSION: The severity of PHT plays a minor role on bleeding and transfusion during LT in a contemporary cohort with systematic PCS. Main determinants of transfusion are liver function and baseline hemoglobin, which would seem the suitable goal to optimize transfusion in LT.