The Changing Face of Feticide in Multiple Pregnancies.

The selective termination of one or more fetuses in higher order multiple pregnancies began in the 1980s in response to the increased rate of multiples arising from assisted reproductive technology (ART). Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction (MFPR) was justified by improving outcomes for the remaining offspring and their mother, and while the evidence suggests prematurity and the morbidity associated with it are reduced, there is a cost in increased miscarriage and mortality. As perinatal care has advanced, the margins of improvement have narrowed and hence the cost/benefit ratio. At the same time, MFPR has morphed from a rare procedure undertaken for quadruplets and higher, to one in which triplets and twins are increasingly reduced to a singleton, and more so for social reasons. This review considers the evidence for MFPR's efficacy and risks, along with those changes over time. Notably absent is research on the surviving children or the ongoing physical and mental health of mothers. The ethical reasoning used by practitioners and others is also explored, as is the culture of ART and abortion that drive the practice.

Identifying families' shared disease experiences through a qualitative analysis of online twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome stories.

BACKGROUND: Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) affects 10-20 % of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) births and accounts for 50 % of fetal loss in MCDA pregnancies. This exploratory qualitative study identified shared experiences, including potential emotional and psychosocial impacts, of this serious disease. METHODS: Forty-five publicly accessible, online stories posted by families who experienced TTTS were analyzed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Shared TTTS experiences included a common trajectory: early pregnancy experiences, diagnostic experiences, making decisions, interventions and variable outcomes. Families vacillated between emotional highs such as joy, excitement and relief, and lows including depression, anxiety, anger and grief. CONCLUSIONS: TTTS disease experience can be considered an "emotional roller coaster" exacerbated by TTTS's unpredictable and quickly changing nature with the potential for emotional and psychosocial effects. Increased TTTS awareness and research about its corresponding impacts can ensure appropriate patient and family support at all phases of the TTTS experience.

Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with a multiple pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: When couples are faced with the dilemma of a higher-order multiple pregnancy there are three options. Termination of the entire pregnancy has generally not been acceptable to women, especially for those with a past history of infertility. Attempting to continue with all the fetuses is associated with inherent problems of preterm birth, survival and long-term morbidity. The other alternative relates to reduction in the number of fetuses by selective termination. The acceptability of these options for the couple will depend on their social background and underlying beliefs. This review focused on reduction in the number of fetuses. OBJECTIVES: To assess a policy of multifetal reduction with a policy of expectant management of women with a multiple pregnancy. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 July 2015). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials with reported data that compared outcomes in mothers and babies who were managed expectantly with outcomes in women who underwent selective fetal reduction of a multiple pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We planned that two review authors would independently assess trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extract data and check them for accuracy. However, no randomised trials were identified. MAIN RESULTS: There were no randomised controlled trials identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no available data from randomised trials to inform the risks and benefits of pregnancy reduction procedures for women with a multiple pregnancy. While randomised controlled trials will provide the most reliable evidence about the risks and benefits of fetal reduction procedures, reduction in the number of fetuses by selective termination may not be acceptable to women, particularly couples with a past history of infertility. The acceptability of this option, and willingness to undergo randomisation will depend on the couple's social background and beliefs, and consequently, recruitment to such a trial may prove exceptionally difficult.

Bipolar cord coagulation for selective feticide in complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies: 118 consecutive cases at a single center.

OBJECTIVE: To review the experience of performing selective feticide with bipolar cord coagulation (BCC) in complicated monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies at a single center. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of BCC performed using 3-mm bipolar forceps under ultrasound control in cases complicated by twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, selective growth restriction, discordant anomaly or twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence. RESULTS: The series comprised 118 cases with a median gestational age at the time of the procedure of 22 (range, 16-30) weeks. There were 14 (12%) intrauterine deaths of the cotwin, eight (7%) miscarriages and one (1%) termination of pregnancy. When BCC was performed before 19 weeks of gestation, the rate of miscarriage was 45%, whereas it was 3% (P < 0.001) when BCC was performed after 19 weeks. Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurred in 45 (38%) cases. The median interval between BCC and PPROM was 4 (interquartile range, 2-9) weeks. In 15 (13%) cases, PPROM occurred within 2 weeks after the procedure. Median gestational age at delivery was 34 (range, 24-41) weeks. The median birth weight was 2103 (range, 480-3875) g. Neonatal death occurred in 11 (9%) cases, and two (2%) children had severe neurologic morbidity. The overall survival rate was 71% (84/118). CONCLUSION: BCC is an effective procedure in complicated MC twin pregnancies for selective feticide or when one fetus is severely jeopardized and delivery is not yet an option. Better outcomes can be achieved when this procedure is performed after 19 weeks.

Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with a multiple pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: When couples are faced with the dilemma of a higher-order multiple pregnancy there are three options. Termination of the entire pregnancy has generally not been acceptable to women, especially for those with a past history of infertility. Attempting to continue with all the fetuses is associated with inherent problems of preterm birth, survival and long-term morbidity. The other alternative relates to reduction in the number of fetuses by selective termination. The acceptability of these options for the couple will depend on their social background and underlying beliefs. This review focused on reduction in the number of fetuses. OBJECTIVES: To assess a policy of multifetal reduction with a policy of expectant management of women with a multiple pregnancy. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (13 June 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials with reported data that compared outcomes in mothers and babies who were managed expectantly with outcomes in women who underwent selective fetal reduction of a multiple pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: There were no randomised controlled trials identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no available data from randomised trials to inform the risks and benefits of pregnancy reduction procedures for women with a multiple pregnancy. While randomised controlled trials will provide the most reliable evidence about the risks and benefits of fetal reduction procedures, reduction in the number of fetuses by selective termination may not be acceptable to women, particularly couples with a past history of infertility. The acceptability of this option, and willingness to undergo randomisation will depend on the couple's social background and beliefs, and consequently, recruitment to such a trial may prove exceptionally difficult.

Babies with myelomeningocele in Poland: parents' attitudes on fetal surgery versus termination of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Recent surgical advances have resulted in fetal surgery becoming an option for children with myelomeningocele (MMC). However, there is little information about the parents' attitudes towards such therapy. METHODS: Following a lecture on the current status and problems of fetal surgery for MMC, a 12-item questionnaire was administered to 58 parents of children with MMC. Questionnaire topics included knowledge of the disease and treatment options, as well as attitudes and concerns towards fetal surgery or termination of pregnancy. RESULTS: Following the lecture, 14 (out of 58) parents felt that knowledge of the disease would allow for abortion to be an option, while 18 were uncertain. Once informed of potential risks and benefits of fetal surgery, 34 parents had a positive or rather positive attitude towards this procedure. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these results, it was concluded that this population is potentially interested in the use of fetal surgery.

Sometimes doing the right thing sucks: frame combinations and multi-fetal pregnancy reduction decision difficulty.

Data are analyzed for 54 women who made an appointment with a North American Center specializing in multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) to be counseled and possibly have a reduction. The impact on decision difficulty of combinations of three frames through which patients may understand and consider their options and use to justify their decisions are examined: a conceptional frame marked by a belief that life begins at conception; a medical frame marked by a belief in the statistics regarding risk and risk prevention through selective reduction; and a lifestyle frame marked by a belief that a balance of children and career has normative value. All data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and observation during the visit to the center over an average 2.5h period. Decision difficulty was indicated by self-assessed decision difficulty and by residual emotional turmoil surrounding the decision. Qualitative comparative analysis was used to analyze the impact of combinations of frames on decision difficulty. Separate analyses were conducted for those reducing only to three fetuses (or deciding not to reduce) and women who chose to reduce below three fetuses. Results indicated that for those with a non-intense conceptional frame, the decision was comparatively easy no matter whether the patients had high or low values of medical and lifestyle frames. For those with an intense conceptional frame, the decision was almost uniformly difficult, with the exception of those who chose to reduce only to three fetuses. Simplifying the results to their most parsimonious scenarios oversimplifies the results and precludes an understanding of how women can feel pulled in different directions by the dictates of the frames they hold. Variations in the characterization of intense medical frames, for example, can both pull toward reduction to two fetuses and neutralize shame and guilt by seeming to remove personal responsibility for the decision. We conclude that the examination of frame combinations is an important tool for understanding the way women carrying multiple fetuses negotiate their way through multi-fetal pregnancies, and that it may have more general relevance for understanding pregnancy decisions in context.

IVF patients' attitudes toward multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine attitudes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients toward multifetal pregnancy reduction before and after embryo transfer. STUDY DESIGN: Women seeking IVF consultation were surveyed before and after embryo transfer regarding their attitudes toward multifetal pregnancy reduction. RESULTS: Thirty-one of 36 subjects completed the initial survey. The mean age was 32.9 years, 93% of subjects were Caucasian, and 61.3% were nulliparous. Most subjects described themselves as "pro-choice" (20 of 31, 64.5%). Overall, 22.6% (7 of 31) stated that they would never consider fetal reduction in a multifetal pregnancy and 77.4% (24 of 31) stated that they would consider multifetal pregnancy reduction. The threshold to consider fetal reduction was triplets. Prochoice subjects were significantly more likely to consider multifetal pregnancy reduction when compared to "prolife" subjects (p <0.01). Twelve of the 31 subjects underwent embryo transfer and completed the second survey. Patient attitude did not change significantly from the time of initial IVF consultation to after embryo transfer. CONCLUSION: Overall, women undergoing IVF would consider multifetal pregnancy reduction, and this view did not change after embryo transfer. Pro-choice subjects were more likely to consider multifetal pregnancy reduction.

Twin pregnancy complicated by esophageal atresia, duodenal atresia, gastric perforation, and hypoplastic left heart structures in one twin: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: The antenatal diagnosis of a combined esophageal atresia without tracheoesophageal fistula and duodenal atresia with or without gastric perforation is a rare occurrence. These diagnoses are difficult and can be suspected on ultrasound by nonspecific findings including a small stomach and polyhydramnios. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging adds significant anatomical detail and can aid in the diagnosis of these complicated cases. Upon an extensive literature review, there are no reports documenting these combined findings in a twin pregnancy. Therefore we believe this is the first case report of an antenatal diagnosis of combined pure esophageal and duodenal atresia in a twin gestation. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 30-year-old G1P0 white woman at 22-week gestation with a monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancy discordant for esophageal atresia, duodenal atresia with gastric perforation, hypoplastic left heart structures, and significant early gestation maternal polyhydramnios. In this case, fetal magnetic resonance imaging was able to depict additional findings including area of gastric wall rupture, hiatal hernia, dilation of the distal esophagus, and area of duodenal obstruction and thus facilitated the proper diagnosis. After extensive counseling at our multidisciplinary team meeting, the parents elected to proceed with radiofrequency ablation of the anomalous twin to maximize the survival of the normal co-twin. The procedure was performed successfully with complete cessation of flow in the umbilical artery and complete cardiac standstill in the anomalous twin with no detrimental effects on the healthy co-twin. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal diagnosis of complex anomalies in twin pregnancies constitutes a multitude of ethical, religious, and cultural factors that come into play in the management of these cases. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging provides detailed valuable information that can assist in management options including possible prenatal intervention. The combination of a cystic structure with peristalsis-like movement above the diaphragm (for example, "the upper thoracic pouch sign"), polyhydramnios, and progressive distention of the stomach and duodenum should increase suspicion for a combined pure esophageal and duodenal atresia.

Lived experiences of Taiwanese women with multifetal pregnancies who receive fetal reduction.

This study explores lived experiences of Taiwanese women with multifetal pregnancies who receive fetal reduction. This qualitative study adopted a field method with observer-as-participant approach to collect data. Six subjects were recruited from a medical center using purposive sampling. Most of the subjects were contacted nine times. The total time of observation was 8-10 weeks. The collected data was analyzed by content analysis, and forming themes. The findings are as follows: (1) difficulty in accepting unexpected multiple pregnancies; (2) worry over danger/risk of multiple pregnancies and concern about fetal reduction; (3) decision to take fetal reduction for the safe delivery and health of two babies; (4) anxiety about the techniques of fetal reduction; (5) growing emotion of attachment to the fetus and guilty feeling; (6) unbearable physical/mental stress when facing the intrusion of fetal reduction; (7) being enmeshed in fear of unstable pregnancy and guilt; and (8) cloud of uncertainty diminished, return to normal pregnancy. The results indicated that the women with multifetal pregnancies, who received fetal reduction, encountered a difficult decision. They were exposed to tremendous emotional responses. The findings of this study can help nurses to gain a deeper understanding of those women's experiences. More sensitive, precise recognition, as well as suitable nursing intervention can be provided, in order to promote better acceptance of and adjustment to the fetal reduction.

[Lived experience of multifetal pregnant women with fetal reduction].

The purpose of this study was to explore the lived experience of multifetal pregnant women who underwent fetal reduction. Using a qualitative research design, we recruited ten multifetal pregnant women with fetal reduction from an obstetrics and gynecology clinic in Taipei. The researcher, as a nurse counselor, collected data while providing care. Data were collected during the first counseling scheduled prior to the fetal reduction to five weeks post the procedure. Approximately five face-to-face interviews and eight phone follow-ups were completed for each subject. Data were recorded in a narrative form and analyzed based on interpretive research strategies of phenomenology. According to the data, the lived experience was categorized into seven themes: (a) pre-fetal reduction: feeling threatened by the confirmed diagnosis of multifetal pregnancy, facing guilt and conflict of undergoing fetal reduction; (b) undergoing fetal reduction: getting confused due to family's concern about fetal reduction, losing a sense of body boundary intactness, and worrying about the safety of the remaining fetuses; (c) post-fetal reduction: grieving for losing fetus, returning to the course of normal pregnancy. The findings indicate that undergoing fetal reduction impacted the physical and psychological well-being of multifetal pregnant women. Health care providers should provide individual yet holistic care in a timely fashion.

En route to an "instant family": psychosocial considerations.

Societal and cultural norms require that a worthwhile person engage in reproduction and formation of a family. Young adults who postpone childbearing may presume that fertility is granted. When all other measures fail, the use of assisted reproductive technologies is considered the ultimate salvation for these couples. It is highly stressful and may lead to significant negative psychological consequences (loss of self-esteem, confidence, health, close relationships, security, and hope). Assisted reproductive technology may produce multiple pregnancy, which is frequently overlooked or underappreciated by infertile couples. Despite the real risks associated with a multiple pregnancy and birth, infertile patients often express a desperate wish to have twins or triplets, thereby accomplishing an instant family. It is necessary to provide these couples with detailed information on the risks of multiple pregnancy and birth.

Follow-up of pregnancies, infants, and families after multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the course of multifetal pregnancies and also the long-term pediatric and psychosocial follow-up of surviving offspring and their parents after selective reduction. DESIGN: Follow-up study. SETTING: University hospital and subject's homes. PATIENTS: Twenty-one couples with high-order multiple pregnancies resulting from infertility treatment were referred from all over the Netherlands. A total of 36 infants (15 twins and 2 triplets) were included in the follow-up. INTERVENTION: Pregnancy reduction by transabdominal approach at a median of 11 (9 to 13) weeks gestation. One assessment took place between the age of 9 months and 6 years after delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy outcome, health of the infants, and psychosocial impact upon their parents after infertility treatment and the multifetal pregnancy reduction. RESULTS: Abortion within 4 weeks after pregnancy reduction did not occur in this series. Six infants (13.7%) died perinatally. Two infants (4.4%) died at the ages of 12 days and 3 months, respectively. Early preterm delivery was the cause of death in all cases. The development of the infants was appropriate to gestational age and birth weight. At follow-up, 14 couples disclosed at the time they were unaware of the risks and the consequences of infertility treatment. Nine couples indicated they had feelings of guilt after pregnancy reduction. These feelings, however, were not disclosed at the time of the interviews, during which none of the families showed either regret or distress about their decision. Two couples only occasionally experienced some grief and mourning reactions for the reduced fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy reduction is an acceptable option in the case of excessive multifetal conceptions after infertility treatment regimes. There are no adverse effects on either the infants and their families provided that the procedure is carefully planned and performed and the couples are given full support both before and after the procedure.

Less is more: the risks of multiple births. The Institute for Science, Law, and Technology Working Group on Reproductive Technology.

OBJECTIVE: To review the medical, social, and financial risks caused by the birth of multiples that need to be addressed in policy and practice. RESULT(S): Many risks of multiple births are described in the literature. The medical risks to the offspring include death, low birth weight, deformational plagiocephaly, and other physical and mental disabilities. Risks to the women include premature labor, premature delivery, pregnancy-induced hypertension, toxemia, gestational diabetes, and vaginal-uterine hemorrhage. Children born in multiples face difficulty socializing, developmental delays, and behavioral problems, whereas their parents risk exhaustion, depression, and anxiety. In addition to personal costs faced by families, society often bears the financial costs of overburdened hospitals, caps on insurance and/or inability of parents to cover expenses. CONCLUSION(S): Multiple births present potential acute and long-term medical risks to the pregnant woman and her children. However, more long-term follow-up research and more research on outcomes with higher-order multiples are needed. In designing practices and policies to improve the success of IVF while reducing the risk of multiples, it is important to balance the many interests involved. At a minimum, providers and patients need to be educated about the risks of multiple gestation so that steps can be taken to prevent adverse outcomes.

Attitudes of in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination couples toward multiple gestation pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine attitudes regarding multiple pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction in couples embarking on gonadotropin therapy. DESIGN: Questionnaire given to couples initiating gonadotropin therapy. SETTING: University hospital-based infertility unit. PATIENTS: Twenty-seven couples undergoing IVF and 50 couples undergoing IUI. RESULTS: The groups' responses tended to be quite similar, with all groups reporting declining favorability ratings as the fetal order increased. The IUI group did feel more favorable than the IVF group toward all gestational outcomes and less favorable toward multifetal pregnancy reduction. A history of live births and length of infertility had no significant impact on the results. CONCLUSION: Couples undergoing gonadotropin therapy have an overall favorable attitude toward multiple gestational pregnancies of triplets or twins and an increased willingness to consider multifetal pregnancy reduction for quadruplets and more.

The psychological effects of multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To study the psychological effects of multifetal pregnancy reduction. DESIGN AND SETTING: Hour-long semistructured telephone interviews with both multifetal pregnancy reduction patients and control subjects. PATIENTS: Forty-two multifetal pregnancy reduction patients were contacted within 1 year of undergoing the procedure. Forty-four control subjects had become pregnant after infertility evaluation or treatment but conceived only a single fetus or twins and thus did not consider fetal termination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standardized measures of depressive disorder and current psychiatric symptoms, as well as questions about emotional reactions to multifetal pregnancy reduction. RESULTS: Reduction patients who were pregnant or postpartum at the time of the interview (n = 34) were no more likely than pregnant or postpartum controls (n = 34) to report episodes of depression or high psychiatric symptom levels. The same proportion (14.7%) of both reduction patients and controls with a successful pregnancy outcome met criteria for an episode of major depressive disorder occurring during the 9 months before the interview. In contrast, the 8 reduction patients who spontaneously aborted the entire pregnancy and the 10 controls who spontaneously aborted reported significantly higher rates of the full depressive syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Multifetal pregnancy reduction is experienced as stressful and distressing. However, when pregnancy outcome is successful, the medical intervention does not put women at significant risk for affective illness or elevated levels of psychiatric symptoms.

Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with triplet and higher order multiple pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: When couples are faced with the dilemma of a higher order multiple pregnancy there are three options. Termination of the entire pregnancy has generally not been acceptable to women, especially for those with a past history of infertility. Attempting to continue with all the fetuses is associated with inherent problems of preterm birth, survival and long term morbidity. The other alternative relates to reduction in the number of fetuses by selective termination. The acceptability of these options for the couple will depend on their social background and underlying beliefs. This review focused on reduction in the number of fetuses. OBJECTIVES: To assess a policy of multifetal reduction with a policy of expectant management of women with a triplet or higher order multiple pregnancy. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (30 September 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2002), and PubMed (to 30 September 2002). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials with reported data that compared outcomes in mothers and babies who were managed expectantly with outcomes in women who underwent selective fetal reduction of a triplet or higher order multiple pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: There were no randomised controlled trials identified. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There are insufficient data available to support a policy of pregnancy reduction procedures for women with a triplet or higher order multiple pregnancy. While randomised controlled trials will provide the most reliable evidence about the risks and benefits of fetal reduction procedures, reduction in the number of fetuses by selective termination may not been acceptable to women, especially for those with a past history of infertility. The acceptability of this option, and willingness to undergo randomisation will depend on the couple's social background and beliefs, and consequently, recruitment to such a trial may prove exceptionally difficult.

Multifetal pregnancy reduction and selective termination.

MPR and ST are important options for patients who have multifetal pregnancies. Both procedures have been shown to be technically safe and result in acceptable pregnancy loss rates and GAs at delivery. An important caveat is that these findings are observed in centers that have vast experience performing this type of procedure and should not be generalized to all centers. The authors believe that the good outcomes reported here and elsewhere are a result of having a relatively limited number of operators adhering to a strict common protocol and that they should not be generalized to all centers. Awareness of the ethical and psychological issues aids counseling of patients and their follow-up, but more information is needed in this area. Finally, it is the authors' hope that advances in ART will decrease the need for MPR procedures in the future.

Anxiety among women who have undergone fertility therapy and who are considering multifetal pregnancy reduction: trends and implications.

OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to evaluate the assumption that women carrying multiple fetuses and who have decided upon multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) have a constant high level of anxiety. METHODS: A total of 66 multigestation women considering MFPR were asked to consider how anxious they were when they first started fertility therapy. Using that level of anxiety as a reference point, and using their self-assessments as a vehicle for probing the meaning they attached to their emotional state through time, they then assessed their anxiety level at different points in their pregnancy. RESULTS: Self-reported anxiety across time displayed considerable variation: there was a large drop in anxiety with pregnancy diagnosis. The women's anxiety rose to very high levels with the diagnosis of carrying multiples. Anxiety moderated again on average with consultation, rose sharply during the course of the procedure, and finally dropped to lower levels on average after the procedure was over. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that women with multigestation experience considerable fluctuations in their level of anxiety from the time that they first start fertility therapy until they learn that they are carrying multiple embryos. Their expectations for the future of becoming pregnant seem at last fulfilled (becoming pregnant), become complicated (with multiples), appear salvageable (with consultation), but with a morally complicated resolution (MFPR) that seems at last to have put the pregnancy back on a normal track (post-MFPR). Those working with MFPR patients before, during and after the operation must understand the nature and variability of the anxiety that their patients are confronting, and how they are attempting to construct a safe passage through the moral dilemma associated with the multiple-gestation situation.

Multifetal pregnancy reduction: psychodynamic implications.

New reproductive technologies, such as advanced infertility treatments, may have significant implications for women's psychological experience of pregnancy and motherhood. This paper examines some of the psychodynamic implications of multifetal pregnancy reduction, a medical procedure in which some of the fetuses in a multiple pregnancy are aborted while other fetuses are carried to term. Forty-four women who had undergone pregnancy reductions were interviewed about their emotional experience of this medical intervention and their subsequent pregnancies. A qualitative analysis of their experience was conducted from five psychoanalytically-informed vantage points: drive theory, ego psychology, object relations theory, self psychology and a developmental perspective. Women experienced having to abort some of their fetuses as a stressful and distressing life event, and a fourth of the women experienced bereavement reactions which impaired their functioning for at least two weeks. Conscious and unconscious responses to the procedure included ambivalence, guilt, and a sense of narcissistic injury, increasing the complexity of their attachment to the remaining babies. However, the achievement of the developmental goal of parenting healthy birth children helped most women feel that they had made the right decision for themselves and their families. Further research is indicated, including interviews before the reduction and long-term follow-up of mothers and surviving children.