RESUMEN
PURPOSE: We sought to identify trends and characteristics associated with the availability of tailored mental health services for individuals involved in the criminal justice system and ordered to treatment by a court, nationally in the US and by state. METHODS: We used National Mental Health Services Survey to identify outpatient mental health treatment facilities in the US (2016 n = 4744; 2018 n = 4626; 2020 n = 4869). We used clustered multiple logistic regression to identify changes over time as well as facility- and state-level factors associated with the availability of specialty court-ordered services. RESULTS: Slightly more than half of the outpatient mental health treatment facilities offered specialized services for individuals ordered to treatment by a court, with wide variation between states. Nationally, there was a significant increase in the odds of offering court-ordered treatment in 2020 compared to 2016 (aOR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.06-1.27, p < 0.01). Notable associations included offering integrated substance use treatment (versus none, aOR = 2.95, 95% CI = 2.70-3.22, p < 0.0001) and offering trauma therapy (versus none, aOR = 2.05, 95% CI = 1.85-2.27, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The availability of mental health services for individuals ordered to treatment by a court is growing nationally but several states are lagging behind. Court ordered treatment is a promising strategy to improve health and reduce reliance on the carceral system as a healthcare provider. At the same time, we express caution around disparities within behavioral health courts and advocate for equity in access to incarceration alternatives.
Asunto(s)
Derecho Penal , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Servicios de Salud Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Derecho Penal/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Modelos Logísticos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) telehealth items were expanded in March 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. We measured the use of MBS telepsychiatry items compared to consultant physician telehealth items within the context of these item changes, to understand differences in telepsychiatry and physician telehealth utilisation. METHODS: Monthly counts of face-to-face and telehealth (videoconferencing and telephone) MBS items for psychiatrists and physicians from January 2017 to December 2022 were compiled from Services Australia MBS Item Reports. Usage levels were compared before and after telehealth item expansion. Usage trends for MBS telepsychiatry and physician telehealth items were compared in time-series plots. RESULTS: Telehealth item expansion resulted in a greater rise of telepsychiatry services from 3.8% beforehand to 43.8% of total services subsequently, compared with physician telehealth services (from 0.6% to 20.0%). More physician telehealth services were by telephone compared with telepsychiatry services. Time-series of both telehealth services displayed similar patterns until mid-2022, when physician telehealth services declined as telephone items were restricted. Telepsychiatry services consistently comprised a greater proportion of total services than physician telehealth services. CONCLUSIONS: MBS psychiatrist services showed a more substantial and persistent shift to telehealth than physician services, suggesting a greater preference and use of telepsychiatry.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Psiquiatría , Telemedicina , Humanos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia , Psiquiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Psiquiatría/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Consultores/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Nacionales de Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coercion in Dutch mental health care has continuously increased since the Special Admissions to Psychiatric Hospitals Act (Bopz) came into force in 1994. With the introduction of the Conditional Authorization in 2004, the increase in involuntary admissions was slowed down and outpatient compulsory treatment increased. The new Compulsory Mental Healthcare Act in the Netherlands (Wvggz) has been in force since 2020 and aims to reduce involuntary admissions. AIM: Description of trends in compulsory mental healthcare based on decisions under the BOPZ and its successors, the Wvggz and the Care and Compulsion Act (Wzd). METHOD: Annual data 2003-2023 from the national Council for the Judiciary (Rvdr) on authorizations (legal detentions) were analysed with linear regression. RESULTS: The Rvdr-data show a steady increase of compulsory admissions until 2020. From 2020 onwards, the trend appears to have been halted. CONCLUSION: The Rvdr data show an interruption of the previously observed increasing trend. The actual number of involuntary admissions unknown due to al lack of a national register.
Asunto(s)
Internamiento Obligatorio del Enfermo Mental , Países Bajos , Humanos , Internamiento Obligatorio del Enfermo Mental/tendencias , Internamiento Obligatorio del Enfermo Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Coerción , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: First, to describe the variation in stakeholders' perceptions related to the desirable mental health services in school environments. Second, to construct alternative future visions based on these perceptions. Finally, to describe stakeholders' perceptions about the actions needed to reach such an ideal state. BACKGROUND: The increased need for mental health care has challenged the role of schools and school health care in the area of mental health services for those of school-age. There is a need for future visions and comprehensive statements concerning the mental health services provided in the school environment. DESIGN: The study was undertaken in Finland, between February 2020 and February 2021. Qualitative individual interviews were conducted with 15 professional stakeholders and focus group interviews with 10 stakeholders advocating for adolescents or parents. METHOD: The study was conducted with the phenomenographic approach using a visioning methodology. The study is reported following the COREQ checklist. RESULT: Four alternative future visions were formulated based on the perceptions of the stakeholders. They emphasised different aspects: (1) non-medicalising the school environment, (2) early and extensive intervention by school nurses enabled by work distribution with mental health specialists, (3) a multiprofessional team providing help on overall health questions and (4) a focusing of the services on mental disorders. Necessary changes were identified at the micro-, mezzo- and macro-level. CONCLUSION: The future visions are based on opposite perceptions related to the mission and focus of school health care. One extreme emphasises overall health promotion for everyone, while the other accentuates treatment for those suffering from mental disorders. The former may lead to inadequate help for mental health problems and the latter insufficient help for other health problems. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This study contributes alternative future visions, promotes strategic planning and helps to clarify the future role of school nurses.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Instituciones Académicas , Aprendizaje , Servicios de Salud Escolar/tendencias , Servicios de Enfermería Escolar , Finlandia , Salud Mental , Investigación Cualitativa , Grupos Focales , Trastornos Mentales/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Determine effect of mental health interventions on psychologic outcomes in informal caregivers of critically ill patients. DATA SOURCES: Searches conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and other databases from inception to October 31, 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Interventions for informal caregivers of critically ill patients in adult ICU, PICU, or neonatal ICU. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent, blinded reviewers screened citations and extracted data. Random-effects models with inverse variance weighting pooled outcome data when suitable. Psychologic outcomes categorized: 1) negative (anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, distress, and burden) or 2) positive (courage, humanity, justice, transcendence, temperance, and wisdom and knowledge). Stratification according to intervention type and patient population was performed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 11,201 studies, 102 interventional trials were included (n = 12,676 informal caregivers). Interventions targeted caregiver experience (n = 58), role (n = 6), or support (n = 38). Meta-analysis (56 randomized controlled trials; n = 22 [39%] in adult ICUs; n = 34 [61%] in neonatal ICU or PICU) demonstrated reduced anxiety (ratio of means = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.97) and depression (ratio of means = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.99), but not post-traumatic stress disorder (ratio of means = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.80-1.04) or distress (ratio of means = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.95-1.07) among informal caregivers randomized to mental health interventions compared with controls within 3 months post-ICU discharge. Increased humanity (ratio of means = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15), transcendence (ratio of means = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.15), and caregiver burden (ratio of means = 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.12) were observed. No significant effects of mental health interventions observed after 3 months postdischarge. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health interventions for caregivers of critically ill patients improved short-term anxiety, depression, humanity, and transcendence while increasing burden. Clinicians should consider short-term prescriptions of mental health interventions to informal caregivers of critically ill patients with capacity to manage interventions.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores/psicología , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Atención al Paciente/psicología , Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Atención al Paciente/normas , Calidad de Vida/psicologíaRESUMEN
While COVID-19 pandemic has allegedly passed its first peak in most western countries, health systems are progressively adapting to the 'new normality'. In child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS), such organizational envisioning is needed to cope with the foreseeable psychological effects of prolonged social isolation induced by nation-wide public health measures such as school closure. CAMHS need to ensure flexible responses to the psychopathological consequences of evolving societal dynamics, as dramatically actualized by the unexpected COVID-19 pandemic. This would imply (a) shifting the focus of intervention from symptom reduction and containment of acute crises in a comparatively small number of severe cases to a broader preventive strategy, guided by a gradient of increasing intensity and specificity of treatment; (b) promoting smooth access pathways into services and encouraging participation of families; (c) adopting a transdiagnostic staging model to capture the developmental fluctuations from subsyndromal to syndromal states and back, with related changes in the intensity of the need of care; and (d) implementing digital tools to encourage help-seeking and compliance by digitally native youth.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría del Adolescente/tendencias , COVID-19 , Psiquiatría Infantil/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Pandemias , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Humanos , Aislamiento SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psychodermatology is an emerging subspeciality of dermatology. Psychodermatology clinics use a multidisciplinary approach to deal with psychological or psychiatric elements related to skin disease. Two previous studies in 2004 and 2012 highlighted the deficiency of psychodermatology services in the UK, despite the evidence that these services have high demand and are cost-effective. AIMS: To reassess psychodermatology service provision in the UK and outline the developments that have been made. METHODS: In conjunction with BBC Radio 5 Live, a survey questionnaire was distributed via email to the UK membership of the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) and Psychodermatology UK. The survey consisted of 13 questions asking about the availability of psychodermatology services. RESULTS: Basic percentages were used to analyse quantitative data, and content analysis was used for qualitative data. Our results showed that less than a quarter of the respondents (24%) have access to a nearby dedicated psychodermatology service. Additionally, the psychodermatology units do not have a unified configuration and clinical provision model differs nationally. Only around 5% of the clinicians have access to a clinic that provides psychology-dermatology-oncology service, and even fewer have access to a paediatric psychodermatology (4.8%). Engagement in psychodermatology research was reported by around 12% of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: The psychocutaneous services in the UK have improved to some extent over the past decade; the service has become more widely available nationally, and the investment in research is promising. However, it is still insufficient and unable to fulfil patient demand, especially for vulnerable individuals such as children and dermato-oncology patients.
Asunto(s)
Dermatología/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Adulto , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Dermatología/economía , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
In the last half of the 20th century, psychiatry lost many of the conditions needed for unhindered practice. I compiled from searches of the literature the 20th century changes in the arenas of psychiatric practice and the sources of these changes. I determined how these changes are shaping 21st century health and well-being. The neglect of the severely mentally ill, first in Bedlams and now on Boulevards, reflects a wide loss of resources. Psychiatry's patients have lost a past of community-based mental health services, interdisciplinary care teams, preventive consultation with social agencies, and, with reimbursements targeted for 15-minute visits, time adequate with the physician to individualize diagnosis and treatment. With the Covid-19 and other epidemics, economic inequalities, an economic crisis, unrest over police violence, and racism, psychiatry can find in its past the resources to engage 21st century psychiatric and other problems.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/historia , Psiquiatría/historia , COVID-19/historia , COVID-19/terapia , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Psiquiatría/economía , Psiquiatría/tendenciasRESUMEN
Telehealth distance health care is a significant resource for young, chronically ill patient populations given their numerous medical complexities and their concomitant depression and/or suicide ideation experiences. This manuscript shares the telehealth methods used to prepare for a larger study of interventions for increasing adolescents' and young adults' chronic care resiliency and skills for preventing depression. The young patients in this study were prescribed lifelong home parenteral nutrition infusions, treatment for those with short gut bowel diseases. The training methods for our mental health nurse and psychologist to conduct depression and suicide ideation assessments from a distance are presented. The study implementation methods of group facilitated interventions and discussion are reviewed. The group discussions were conducted via audiovisual telehealth devices over encrypted firewall-protected connections with patients in their own homes and professionals in an office. The results of assessments of the 40 participants, 25% (n = 10) with depressive symptoms or suicide ideation, are described. Following participants' assessments, their subsequent depression measures were all in the normal range, without any suicide ideation, across the year of the study. Patient evaluation ratings were high in the areas of being able to connect with other young patients in similar situations, using the audiovisual equipment, and learning new useful information from the interventions. The methods developed for the study ensured that the safety and well-being of participants were supported through telehealth.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Ideación Suicida , Telemedicina/normas , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Australian federal government introduced new COVID-19 psychiatrist Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items to assist with providing private specialist care. We investigate private psychiatrists' uptake of video and telephone telehealth, as well as total (telehealth and face-to-face) consultations for Quarter 3 (July-September), 2020. We compare these to the same quarter in 2019. METHOD: MBS-item service data were extracted for COVID-19-psychiatrist video and telephone telehealth item numbers and compared with Quarter 3 (July-September), 2019, of face-to-face consultations for the whole of Australia. RESULTS: The number of psychiatry consultations (telehealth and face-to-face) rose during the first wave of the pandemic in Quarter 3, 2020, by 14% compared to Quarter 3, 2019, with telehealth 43% of this total. Face-to-face consultations in Quarter 3, 2020 were only 64% of the comparative number of Quarter 3, 2019 consultations. Most telehealth involved short telephone consultations of ⩽15-30 min. Video consultations comprised 42% of total telehealth provision: these were for new patient assessments and longer consultations. These figures represent increased face-to-face consultation compared to Quarter 2, 2020, with substantial maintenance of telehealth consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Private psychiatrists continued using the new COVID-19 MBS telehealth items for Quarter 3, 2020 to increase the number of patient care contacts in the context of decreased face-to-face consultations compared to 2019, but increased face-to-face consultations compared to Quarter 2, 2020.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Práctica Privada/tendencias , Psiquiatría/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Australia , COVID-19/epidemiología , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Pandemias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Práctica Privada/organización & administración , Psiquiatría/organización & administración , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Teléfono/tendencias , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Australian Commonwealth Government introduced new psychiatrist Medicare-Benefits-Schedule (MBS)-telehealth items in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic to assist with previously office-based psychiatric practice. We investigate private psychiatrists' uptake of (1) video- and telephone-telehealth consultations for Quarter-2 (April-June) of 2020 and (2) total telehealth and face-to-face consultations in Quarter-2, 2020 in comparison to Quarter-2, 2019 for Australia. METHODS: MBS item service data were extracted for COVID-19-psychiatrist-video- and telephone-telehealth item numbers and compared with a baseline of the Quarter-2, 2019 (April-June 2019) of face-to-face consultations for the whole of Australia. RESULTS: Combined telehealth and face-to-face psychiatry consultations rose during the first wave of the pandemic in Quarter-2, 2020 by 14% compared to Quarter-2, 2019 and telehealth was approximately half of this total. Face-to-face consultations in 2020 comprised only 56% of the comparative Quarter-2, 2019 consultations. Most telehealth provision was by telephone for short consultations of ⩽15-30 min. Video consultations comprised 38% of the total telehealth provision (for new patient assessments and longer consultations). CONCLUSIONS: There has been a flexible, rapid response to patient demand by private psychiatrists using the new COVID-19-MBS-telehealth items for Quarter-2, 2020, and in the context of decreased face-to-face consultations, ongoing telehealth is essential.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Práctica Privada/tendencias , Psiquiatría/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Australia/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Pandemias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Práctica Privada/organización & administración , Psiquiatría/métodos , Psiquiatría/organización & administración , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Teléfono , Comunicación por VideoconferenciaRESUMEN
Treatment with psychotropic medication may sometimes be jeopardised because of the COVID-19 pandemic. One underlying reason is the lack of COVID-19-specific psychopharmacology guidelines. Here, we discuss five considerations arising from our clinical experience and pharmacological background knowledge to enable safe and well-informed psychopharmacotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Trastornos Mentales , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Psicoterapia , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/terapia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/normas , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Selección de Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Psicoterapia/métodos , Psicoterapia/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/métodosRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) presents two urgent health problems: the illness caused by the virus itself and the anxiety, panic and psychological problems associated with the pandemic. Both problems present substantial challenges for our patients, their families, our multidisciplinary teams and our psychiatrist colleagues. We need good psychiatry, now more than ever.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Servicios de Salud Mental , Salud Mental/tendencias , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Estrés Psicológico , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/psicología , Salud Global/tendencias , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Pandemias/prevención & control , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/psicología , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/fisiopatología , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mental illness is widely perceived to be more of a public health concern now than in the past; however, it is unclear whether this perception is due to an increase in the prevalence of mental illness, an increase in help-seeking behaviours or both. We examined temporal trends in use of mental health services as well as objectively measured and perceived mental health. METHODS: We conducted a repeat cross-sectional study of Ontario residents who participated in Statistics Canada's Canadian Community Health Survey (2002-2014). We assessed temporal trends in objectively measured past-year major depressive episode (based on criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision) and past-month psychological distress (Kessler Psychological Distress Scale-6 score ≥ 8) and perceived, self-rated mental health. We also examined use of mental health services, including service use among those with a need for mental health care. RESULTS: A total of 260 090 survey participants were included. The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of a major depressive episode (4.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2%-5.3% in 2002 v. 4.9%, 95% CI 4.2%-5.7% in 2012; p = 0.9) and psychological distress (7.0%, 95% CI 6.3%-7.6% in 2002 v. 6.5%, 95% CI 5.7%-7.5% in 2012; p = 0.4) did not change significantly over time. However, self-rated fair or poor mental health status increased from 4.9% in 2003-2005 to 6.5% in 2011-2014 (p trend < 0.001), as did the use of mental health services (7.2% to 12.8%, p trend < 0.001). The percentage of individuals who had subjective or objectively measured mental health problems and did not access mental health services decreased significantly over time. INTERPRETATION: Given the stable prevalence of objectively measured psychiatric symptoms, the increase in use of mental health services appears to be, at least partly, explained by an increase in perceived poor mental health and help-seeking behaviours.
Asunto(s)
Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario/epidemiología , Prevalencia , AutoinformeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The mental health treatment gap-the difference between those with mental health need and those who receive treatment-is high in low- and middle-income countries. Task-shifting has been used to address the shortage of mental health professionals, with a growing body of research demonstrating the effectiveness of mental health interventions delivered through task-shifting. However, very little research has focused on how to embed, support, and sustain task-shifting in government-funded systems with potential for scale up. The goal of the Building and Sustaining Interventions for Children (BASIC) study is to examine implementation policies and practices that predict adoption, fidelity, and sustainment of a mental health intervention in the education sector via teacher delivery and the health sector via community health volunteer delivery. METHODS: BASIC is a Hybrid Type II Implementation-Effectiveness trial. The study design is a stepped wedge, cluster randomized trial involving 7 sequences of 40 schools and 40 communities surrounding the schools. Enrollment consists of 120 teachers, 120 community health volunteers, up to 80 site leaders, and up to 1280 youth and one of their primary guardians. The evidence-based mental health intervention is a locally adapted version of Trauma-focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, called Pamoja Tunaweza. Lay counselors are trained and supervised in Pamoja Tunaweza by local trainers who are experienced in delivering the intervention and who participated in a Train-the-Trainer model of skills transfer. After the first sequence completes implementation, in-depth interviews are conducted with initial implementing sites' counselors and leaders. Findings are used to inform delivery of implementation facilitation for subsequent sequences' sites. We use a mixed methods approach including qualitative comparative analysis to identify necessary and sufficient implementation policies and practices that predict 3 implementation outcomes of interest: adoption, fidelity, and sustainment. We also examine child mental health outcomes and cost of the intervention in both the education and health sectors. DISCUSSION: The BASIC study will provide knowledge about how implementation of task-shifted mental health care can be supported in government systems that already serve children and adolescents. Knowledge about implementation policies and practices from BASIC can advance the science of implementation in low-resource contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03243396. Registered 9th August 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03243396.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/tendencias , Recursos en Salud/tendencias , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Salud Mental/tendencias , Adolescente , Niño , Análisis por Conglomerados , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/economía , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Psicoterapia/economía , Psicoterapia/métodos , Psicoterapia/tendenciasRESUMEN
COVID-19 has resulted in broad impacts on the economy and aspects of daily life including our collective mental health and well-being. The Australian health care system already faces limitations in its ability to treat people with mental health diagnoses. Australia has responded to the COVID-19 outbreak by, among other initiatives, providing reimbursement for telehealth services. However, it is unclear if these measures will be enough to manage the psychological distress, depression, anxiety and post-traumatic distress shown to accompany infectious disease outbreaks and economic shocks. Decision making has focused on the physical health ramifications of COVID-19, the avoidance of over-burdening the health care system and saving lives. We propose an alternative framework for decision making that combines life years saved with impacts on quality of life. A framework that simultaneously includes mental health and broader economic impacts into a single decision-making process would facilitate transparent and accountable decision making that can improve the overall welfare of Australian society as we continue to address the considerable challenges that the COVID-19 pandemic is creating.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Salud Mental , Calidad de Vida , Australia/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/psicología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Salud Mental/economía , Salud Mental/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Innovación Organizacional/economía , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina/economía , Telemedicina/métodosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Mental health and substance use disorders are notable contributors to the global total burden of disease. On a population level, co-occurring mental health and substance use problems are estimated to account for 2-4%. In clinical samples, estimate is even higher. The aim of this study was to examine changes in recognized mental health problems (MHPs) and in the substance use profiles among clients with substance use problems in Finland. METHODS: Data concerning individuals with substance use entering Finnish social and health care services during 1 day were collected nationwide at three time-points in 2007, 2011, and 2015. Cross-tabulations and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Co-occurring MHPs and substance use problems were common: 56-60% of the clients with substance use problems were reported to have had MHPs between the years 2007 and 2015. The proportion of MHPs remained rather stable among them. Substance use profiles have changed: the proportion of illicit drug use among those who had MHPs has increased in health care services, social services, and substance use problem services. CONCLUSION: Co-occurring substance use and MHPs among clients with substance use problems are common, and substance use profile is shifting from using alcohol only towards illicit drug use. This may even bring along more challenges for the treatment system and should be considered in future service planning.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adulto , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría)/tendencias , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios de Tiempo y MovimientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the absence of extant recommendations, the aim of this study was to formalise support practices used by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit (PCU) for the relatives of patients in the agonal phase preceding death. The secondary objective was to understand the expectations of relatives during this phase in terms of the support provided by professionals and volunteers. METHODS: Thirty-two people took part in this study; all were interviewed through focus groups (FGs). Each FG comprised one category of individuals working in the PCU: nurses, care- assistants, doctors, psychologists, other professionals, palliative-care volunteers, and relatives. Groups were surveyed using an interview guide, and the interviews were recorded and transcribed to enable identification and characterization of all practices. Care practices were classified into four categories: current consensual practices (i.e. performed by all team members), occasional consensual practices, non-consensual practices (performed by one or a few participants), and practices to be developed. RESULTS: In total, 215 practices were mentioned by professionals and palliative-care volunteers: 150 current consensual practices, 48 occasional consensual practices, 1 non-consensual practice, 16 practices yet to be developed, and 29 practices for relatives. Many practices were mentioned by different categories of participants; thus, after cross-checking, the number of practices decreased from 215 to 52. A list of practices deemed desirable by all was drawn up and then validated by the entire interprofessional team. These practices were organised around four themes: providing care and ensuring comfort; communicating, informing, and explaining; interacting; and mobilising interdisciplinary skills. CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the importance of the quality of care provided to patients, the attention given to the relatives themselves, and they highlight the importance of the helping relationship. Following this study, which established a list of varied practices aimed at supporting the relatives of patients in agonal phase, it will be important to set up a broader study seeking to establish a consensus on these practices with an interprofessional group of experts from other PCUs using broad surveys and an adapted methodology. Such studies will make it possible to develop training modules for teams working with relatives.
Asunto(s)
Familia/psicología , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Adulto , Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Femenino , Grupos Focales/métodos , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether there was a change in the rate and types of patients with psychiatric illnesses being seen in the emergency department (ED) from 2012 to 2015 using the National Ambulatory Care Survey. A secondary objective was to determine what if any changes occurred in the resources available to care for these patients. METHODS: Our study used 2012-2015 data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the State Mental Health Agency Per Capita Mental Health Services Expenditures, and expenditures data from 2012-2015 to examine whether there was a significant change in the rate and type of mental illness ED visits. Additional data on the number of beds per region from the National Mental Health Services Survey, 2012-2015 were used. A t test was used to look for significant (P = 0.05) changes in the rate and types of patients, ED dispositions, ED reimbursement types, region and community level income, sex, age, state mental health funding, and psychiatric beds from 2012 to 2015. RESULTS: There was an 8% increase in the rate of patients who presented with a diagnosed mental health disorder (P = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.32-5.96) and substance use disorders (P = 0.03, 95% CI 0.564-0.122). The reimbursement for these visits did change (P = 0.01, 95% CI 0.245-0.685); however, there was no significant increase (P = 0.07, 95% CI-214 to 101) in state mental health budgets and the number of psychiatric and detox hospital beds from 2012 to 2015. CONCLUSIONS: The rate and types of mental health patients coming to the ED are still on the rise. This is coupled with a lack of mental health infrastructure to address the needs and diagnoses that continue to be seen in the ED. States may need increased, targeted funding for mental health outside the increase in coverage via the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to slow the rate of mental health patients seen in the ED.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/economía , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Tennessee is one of the first states in the United States to have a law that enables counselors and therapists in independent practice to deny services to any client based on the practitioner's "sincerely held principles." This so-called "conscience clause" represents a critical moment in professional psychology, in which mental health care providers are on the frontlines of cultural and legal debates about religious freedom. Though the law's language is ambiguous, it was widely perceived to target sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals. We interviewed 20 SGM people living in Tennessee to understand their experiences with mental health care in the state and their perceptions of the law. Our participants perceive the law as fundamentally discriminatory, though they overwhelmingly conceptualize the conscience clause as legalizing discrimination toward members of all stigmatized groups-not just SGM individuals. They described individual and societal consequences for the law, including an understanding of the conscience clause as harmful above and beyond any individual discrimination event it may engender. We situate these findings amid the research on structural stigma and suggest that counseling psychologists become actively engaged in combatting conscience clauses, which appear to have profound consequences on mental health care engagement, particularly for populations vulnerable to discrimination. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).