An electrochemical sensor for ifosfamide, acetaminophen, domperidone, and sumatriptan based on self-assembled MXene/MWCNT/chitosan nanocomposite thin film.

New multi-walled carbon nanotubes supported on Ti3C2-MXene and chitosan (chit) composite film-based electrochemical sensor for ifosfamide (IFO), acetaminophen (ACOP), domperidone (DOM), and sumatriptan (SUM) have been developed. Ti3C2-MXene was synthesized by a fluoride method. Structural and chemical characterizations suggested the successful preparation of Ti3C2-MXene with clearly seen layered morphology, defined 0 0 2 diffraction peak at 7.5° and complete absence of 1 0 4 plane at 39°. The electrochemical performance of the sensor was investigated by cyclic voltammetry and adsorptive stripping differential pulse voltammetry. The Ti3C2/MWCNT/Chit modified glassy carbon electrode exhibits enhanced electrocatalytic activities toward the oxidation of target analytes. Excellent conductivity, large surface area, and high catalytic properties of the Ti3C2-MXene showed synergistic effects with MWCNTs and helped in achieving low detection limits of targets with high selectivity and reproducibility. The assay allows determination of IFO, ACOP, DOM, and SUM in the concentration ranges 0.0011-1.0, 0.0042-7.1, 0.0046-7.3, and 0.0033-61 µM with low detection limits of 0.00031, 0.00028, 0.00034, and 0.00042 µM, respectively. The sensor was successfully applied for voltammetric screening of target analytes in urine and blood serum samples with recoveries > 95.21%. Schematic illustration of the synthesis of self-assembled MXene/MWCNT/chitosan nanocomposite is given and its application to the voltammetric determination of ifosfamide, acetaminophen, domperidone, and sumatriptan described. Graphical abstract.

Development and validation of an LC-ESI-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of naproxen and sumatriptan in human plasma: application to a pharmacokinetic study.

A sensitive and fast liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of naproxen and sumatriptan in human plasma. A simple liquid-liquid extraction procedure, with a mixture of ethyl acetate, methyl tert-butyl ether, and dichloromethane (4:3:3, v/v), was used for the cleanup of plasma. Naratriptan and aceclofenac were employed as internal standards. The analyses were carried out using an ACE C18 column (50 × 4.6 mm i.d.; particle size 5 µm) and a mobile phase consisting of 2 mM aqueous ammonium acetate with 0.025 % formic acid and methanol (38:62, v/v). A triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray source in the positive mode was set up in the selective reaction monitoring mode to detect the ion transitions m/z 231.67 → m/z 185.07, m/z 296.70 → m/z 157.30, m/z 354.80 → m/z 215.00, and m/z 336.80 → m/z 97.94 for naproxen, sumatriptan, aceclofenac, and naratriptan, respectively. The method was validated and proved to be linear, accurate, precise, and selective over the ranges of 2.5-130 µg mL(-1) for naproxen and 1-50 ng mL(-1) for sumatriptan. The validated method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study with simultaneous administration of naproxen sodium and sumatriptan succinate tablet formulations in healthy volunteers.

Improvement of transdermal delivery of sumatriptan succinate using a novel self-dissolving microneedle array fabricated from sodium hyaluronate in rats.

The purpose of the present study was to develop an alternative transdermal formulation containing sumatriptan succinate (SS) for the treatment of migraine. Novel self-dissolving SS-loaded microneedle arrays (MNs) were fabricated from sodium hyaluronate and their efficacy for transdermal delivery of SS was characterized. The resulting MNs maintained their skin piercing abilities for at least 30 min after being placed at a high relative humidity of 75%. Rapid release of SS from the MNs was also observed in vitro. Optical coherence tomography images demonstrated that MNs were able to successfully pierce into rat skin without any bending or cracking, and needles were completely dissolved within 1 h. MNs significantly increased transepidermal water loss; however, skin barrier function gradually recovered to control levels within 24 h, in contrast to the skin damage observed after tape stripping treatment. These findings indicated that the micropores created by MNs quickly resealed, and that the skin damage was reversible. Furthermore, a dose-dependent plasma concentration of SS was obtained after transdermal delivery using SS-loaded MNs in rats. Absorption of SS delivered by MNs was similar to that observed after subcutaneous injection and was associated with high bioavailability (ca. 90%), which was much higher than that produced by oral administration. These findings suggested that application of SS-loaded MNs to the skin provided an effective alternative approach to enhance the transdermal delivery of SS without serious skin damage, and would be likely to improve patient compliance.

Subcutaneous sumatriptan pharmacokinetics: delimiting the monoamine oxidase inhibitor effect.

BACKGROUND: The absolute bioavailability of subcutaneous (s.c.) sumatriptan is 96-100%. The decay curve for plasma concentration after 6 mg s.c. sumatriptan (ie, after T(max) = about 0.2 hours) includes a large distribution component. Metabolism by monoamine oxidase-A (MAO-A) leads to about 40% of the s.c. dose appearing in the urine as the inactive indole acetic acid. Product labeling states that co-administration of an inhibitor of MAO-A (a MAOI-A) causes a 2-fold increase in sumatriptan plasma concentrations, and a 40% increase in elimination half-life. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to determine whether MAOI-A therapy should deter the use of 6 mg s.c. sumatriptan on pharmacokinetic grounds. METHODS: Summary pharmacokinetic data were taken from the literature and from GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) study C92-050. Half-times were converted into rate constants, which were then used in a parsimonious compartmental model (needing only 3 simultaneous differential equations). Acceptance criteria for the model included observed plasma sumatriptan concentrations at T(max), 1, 2, and 10 hours post-dose. A set of 1000 concentration measurements at a resolution of 36 seconds was generated. The model was then perturbed with elimination constants observed during concomitant moclobemide administration, creating a second set of concentration measurements. The 2 sets were then plotted, examined for their differences, and integrated for a second time to obtain and compare areas under the curve (AUCs). RESULTS: The greatest absolute difference between the 2 sets of measurements was 2.85 ng/mL at t = 2.95 hours. A 2-fold difference between the 2 sets occurred only after t = 5.96 hours, when the concentration in the presence of the MAOI-A was 3.72 ng/mL (or <4% of C(max)). At t = 10 hours, the concentrations in both sets were <1 ng/mL (ie, below the lower limit of assay quantitation), and AUC(0-10h) was 97.4 and 117 ng.hour/mL in the absence and presence of the MAOI-A. CONCLUSIONS: There are no pharmacokinetic grounds to deter co-administration of an MAOI-A and subcutaneous sumatriptan. The dominance of the distribution phase and completeness of absorption of a 6 mg dose of s.c. sumatriptan explains the trivial effect size of the MAOI-A on plasma sumatriptan concentrations. Importantly, these findings should not be extrapolated to other routes of administration for sumatriptan.

Rapid oral transmucosal absorption of sumatriptan, and pharmacodynamics in acute migraine.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To determine whether sumatriptan can be absorbed across the oral mucosa, and, if so; then (2) to describe its pharmacokinetics; and (3) to investigate whether there are pharmacodynamic correlates of such pharmacokinetics in patients experiencing migraine attacks. METHODS: Two clinical trials. The first, in normal volunteers, compared the pharmacokinetic performance of a lingual spray (LS) formulation of sumatriptan (2 dose sizes, one of which in both the fed and fasted state) with an orthodox 50-mg sumatriptan tablet. The second clinical trial, in a patient population enriched by documenting suboptimal response to an initial 50-mg sumatriptan tablet, was a multiple-attack, crossover, fixed dose-order, open-label comparison of sumatriptan administered by LS (up to 3 different dose sizes) and a 100-mg sumatriptan tablet. RESULTS: The LS formulations resulted in double-peaked time-plasma concentration curves that are consistent with absorption of sumatriptan across the oral mucosa. The first T(max) was usually about 10-15 minutes. In the enriched patient population, this corresponded with evidence of earlier efficacy for the LS in comparison with a 50-mg tablet; the lower dose size for the former was consistent with oral mucosal drug absorption, and evasion of first-pass metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: The initial pharmacokinetics of LS approximate to those of a subcutaneous injection, albeit some fraction of these doses is also swallowed. These pharmacokinetics correspond with earlier effectiveness of LS in comparison with a 50-mg sumatriptan tablet, and at lower dose, in an enriched, relevant patient population. These initial studies support further development of this innovative formulation of sumatriptan and this new route of administration.

Zelrix: a novel transdermal formulation of sumatriptan.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles of Zelrix (NuPathe Inc., Conshohocken, PA, USA), the novel formulation of sumatriptan (formerly known as NP101). BACKGROUND: Migraine is an episodic headache disorder characterized by a combination of neurological, gastrointestinal, and autonomic symptoms. Gastrointestinal disturbances, including nausea, vomiting, and gastric stasis are common and can result in significant impact on treatment. Triptans are 5-hydroxytriptanime(1B/1D) agonists that work on the trigeminal nerve that is activated during migraine. All triptans approved for use in the US are currently available as oral formulations; however, this may not be the ideal route of administration for many migraineurs. Sumatriptan is also available as a nasal spray and subcutaneous (s.c.) injection. Therefore, the need to develop improved methods for noninvasive parenteral delivery of triptans remains high. METHODS: This was a Phase I, single-center, open-label, crossover study that assessed the pharmacokinetic properties of a single dose of sumatriptan delivered using an iontophoretic transdermal patch in comparison with oral, injection, and nasal delivery. Subjects were healthy male and female volunteers who received each of 5 treatments: sumatriptan 100 mg oral tablets, sumatriptan 6 mg s.c., sumatriptan 20 mg nasal spray, Zelrix I (transdermal patch with 3 g of gel solution delivering 6 mg of sumatriptan transdermally), or Zelrix II (transdermal patch containing 2.6 g of gel solution delivering 6 mg of sumatriptan). RESULTS: The C(max) for Zelrix was reduced to 30% and 28% of the sumatriptan s.c. dose, thereby reducing the risk of triptan-like sensations associated with high peak plasma concentrations. Plasma concentrations for Zelrix I and Zelrix II were intermediate between those for oral and nasal sumatriptan doses tested. Transdermal patch delivery of sumatriptan to the systemic circulation reached plasma concentrations of 10 ng/mL within about 30 minutes. The mean drug delivery of Zelrix I and II was 6.11 mg (confidence intervals [CI] 5.33-6.88) and 6.09 mg (CI 5.52-6.66), respectively. The AUC(0-inf) was approximately 99% for the Zelrix I patch and 100% for the Zelrix II patch as compared with sumatriptan 6 mg s.c. dose. Both doses of sumatriptan transdermal patches were well tolerated. Skin reactions at the patch site were mild and erythema resolved in most subjects within 48-72 hours. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study show that sumatriptan administration using a novel iontophoretic transdermal technology delivers plasma levels within the range for nasal spray, tablet, and injectable sumatriptan. Zelrix I and II were well tolerated and adverse events were mild and transient. Transdermal delivery of sumatriptan using the SmartRelief iontophoretic technology may prove beneficial for a large segment of the migraine population based upon fast, consistent delivery of drug and avoidance of common gastrointestinal disturbances associated with migraine.

An evaporation-free solid-phase extraction method for rapid and accurate analysis of sumatriptan in human plasma by LC-MS/MS.

An evaporation-free solid-phase extraction (SPE) method was developed and validated for sumatriptan. High organic washing (50% methanol) and low organic elution (20% methanol) were used and the recovery was greater than 92%. The eluate was injected into a C18 column without evaporation and reconstitution. Sumatriptan was monitored in positive ion mode with mass transition of m/z 296.4-58.1 amu. The calibration curve was 1-100 ng/mL (r>or=0.9923). The inter-day and intra-day precisions ranged from 4.53 to 9.12% and 1.72 to 6.93%, respectively. This method features reduced cost and pollution, clean extract, high speed, and most importantly overall method reliability.

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the transdermal iontophoretic delivery of sumatriptan succinate.

The objective was to evaluate the transdermal delivery of the 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist, sumatriptan from an iontophoretic patch system, in vivo. Initial in vitro experiments were conducted to optimize formulation parameters prior to iontophoretic delivery in Yorkshire swine. It was found in vitro that increasing drug load in the patch from 9.7 to 39 mg had no statistically significant effect on cumulative delivery (cf. 305.6+/-172.4 vs. 389.4+/-80.4 microg cm(-2), respectively). However, for a given drug load (39 mg) increasing formulation pH from pH 4.7 to 6.8 significantly increased the cumulative amount of sumatriptan delivered across the skin (389.4+/-80.4 vs. 652.4+/-94.2 microg cm(-2)). A biphasic current profile comprising intensities of 1.8 mA from t=0 to t=180 min and 0.8 mA from t=181 min to t=360 min was used for the in vivo experiments. Drug levels in the blood were 13.7+/-4.5 and 53.6+/-10.2 ng ml(-1) at the 30 and 60 min time-points, rising to 90-100 ng ml(-1) during the 90-180 min time-period. The in vivo results show that the pharmacokinetics following transdermal iontophoretic delivery are comparable to those after oral, nasal or rectal administration, but do not match those upon subcutaneous injection.

OCT1 mediates hepatic uptake of sumatriptan and loss-of-function OCT1 polymorphisms affect sumatriptan pharmacokinetics.

The low bioavailability of the anti-migraine drug sumatriptan is partially caused by first-pass hepatic metabolism. In this study, we analyzed the impact of the hepatic organic cation transporter OCT1 on sumatriptan cellular uptake, and of OCT1 polymorphisms on sumatriptan pharmacokinetics. OCT1 transported sumatriptan with high capacity and sumatriptan uptake into human hepatocytes was strongly inhibited by the OCT1 inhibitor MPP(+) . Sumatriptan uptake was not affected by the Met420del polymorphism, but was strongly reduced by Arg61Cys and Gly401Ser, and completely abolished by Gly465Arg and Cys88Arg. Plasma concentrations in humans with two deficient OCT1 alleles were 215% of those with fully active OCT1 (P = 0.0003). OCT1 also transported naratriptan, rizatriptan, and zolmitriptan, suggesting a possible impact of OCT1 polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of other triptans as well. In conclusion, OCT1 is a high-capacity transporter of sumatriptan and polymorphisms causing OCT1 deficiency have similar effects on sumatriptan pharmacokinetics as those observed in subjects with liver impairment.

Sumatriptan (5-HT1D receptor agonist) does not exacerbate symptoms in obsessive compulsive disorder.

The non-selective serotonin (5-HT) receptor agonist meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) has been reported to elicit symptoms in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). MK-212, another non-selective 5-HT receptor agonist, does not seem to induce obsessive compulsive symptoms in OCD patients. The major pharmacological difference between mCPP and MK-212 is their affinity for the 5-HT(ID) receptor. The aim of this study was to explore the role of the 5-HT(ID) receptor in the pathophysiology of OCD, by using a challenge paradigm with the selective 5-HT(ID) receptor agonist sumatriptan (Imigran). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover challenge with sumatriptan (100 mg PO) was performed in 15 OCD patients. Neither the obsessive compulsive symptoms nor mood or anxiety symptoms changed significantly following sumatriptan administration as compared to placebo. Sumatriptan did induce a significant increase in plasma growth hormone (GH) levels. In the present study, no indication were found for the role of the 5-HT(ID) receptor in the pathophysiology of OCD. It should be noted, however, that sumatriptan does not readily pass the blood-brain barrier. Selective 5-HT(ID) receptors with better brain penetrating properties may shed more light on the role of this 5-HT receptor subtype in OCD.

Pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan nasal spray in children.

The authors studied the pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan nasal spray after a single dose in children migraineurs outside of migraine attack. Seventeen subjects (9 females) ages 6 to 11 years were given one dose of sumatriptan nasal spray based on age and weight; children 6 to 8 years of age weighing 25 kg and children ages 9 to 11 years of age weighing 40 kg received 20 mg (n = 4). Plasma sumatriptan concentrations were determined in serial blood samples obtained over 8 hours. Pharmacokinetic analysis included both noncompartmental and population modeling methods. The pharmacokinetic parameter estimates (geometric mean [95% confidence interval]) following 5, 10, and 20 mg sumatriptan were, respectively, as follows: maximum concentration = 8.1 ng/mL (3.6-18.4), 10.8 ng/mL (7.7-15.4), and 12.3 ng/mL (7.6-19.9); half-life = 1.4 hours (1.2-1.8), 1.7 hours (1.4-2.0), and 1.7 hours (1.3-2.3); and AUC = 27.8 ng*h/mL (9.7-79.8), 42.4 ng*h/mL (30.6-58.8), and 49.2 ng*h/mL (32.9-73.7). The median time to maximum concentration for all groups was 2 hours. Population pharmacokinetic modeling included pooled data from this study and from an adolescent study (n = 16). Clearance (CL/F) was 197 L/h for a 30-kg child with between-subject variability of 28%, and the volume of distribution was 751 L, normalized for an 11-year-old child with variability of 43%. The covariate analysis showed that volume increases with age and clearance increases with body size. The absorption was complex, often displaying double-peak plasma concentrations, with a rapid absorption phase and a delayed and rate-limited absorption phase. The dosing scheme based on age and weight resulted in maximal concentrations (C(max)) and systemic exposure (AUC) that were comparable to those observed in adolescents and adults treated with 20 mg. The age- and weight-adjusted dosing scheme appears to an appropriate initial dosing regimen for children with migraine headache. Appropriate safety and efficacy trials will need to be completed in children prior to recommending its use in children.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between butorphanol tartrate nasal spray and sumatriptan succinate.

The pharmacokinetics of butorphanol tartrate given in a nasal spray with and without the co-administration of sumatriptan succinate were studied in 24 healthy men and women. In this crossover design study, all subjects received 2 treatments: a single 1-mg dose of butorphanol nasal spray and a 1-mg dose of butorphanol nasal spray plus a single 6-mg subcutaneous (SC) dose of sumatriptan. There was a two-week washout period between sessions. Serial blood samples were collected and plasma samples analyzed using validated radioimmunoassay and high-performance liquid chromatography/electrochemical procedures to determine the concentrations of unchanged butorphanol and sumatriptan, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences for butorphanol between the 2 treatments on any of the following pharmacokinetic parameters: Cmax, tmax, AUC, t1/2, CL/f, and Vz/f. Similarly, the pharmacokinetic parameters obtained for sumatriptan (given with butorphanol nasal spray) were comparable with the literature values obtained for a single 6-mg SC dose of sumatriptan. These data show a lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between butorphanol nasal spray and sumatriptan. Butorphanol nasal spray and sumatriptan were well tolerated. The adverse experience profiles of butorphanol nasal spray were comparable between the treatments, with and without sumatriptan. It can be concluded that regimens of butorphanol nasal spray and sumatriptan need not be changed for either pharmacokinetic or safety considerations when the two compounds are co-administered in treating acute migraine attacks.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between sumatriptan and naproxen.

Sumatriptan is a 5HT1D agonist used in the treatment of migraine. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, beta-blockers, and calcium channel-blocking antagonists are used in the prophylaxis of migraine. Hence, there is a need to investigate the interaction of these prophylactic drugs with sumatriptan. The interaction of sumatriptan with propranolol, flunarizine, pizotifen, and butorphanol were reported earlier. Naproxen is shown to be effective in prophylactic treatment of migraine. In this study, the authors have investigated the circadian rhythm effect of naproxen on the pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan at 1000 and 2200 hours. Twelve healthy volunteers were treated with 100 mg sumatriptan succinate either alone or along with 500 mg naproxen orally at either 1000 or 2200 hours in a randomized Latin square design with a washout period of 10 days. Serum samples were collected at predetermined time intervals and analyzed for unchanged sumatriptan by high-performance liquid chromatography. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by using model-independent methods. Naproxen had no statistically significant (p > 0.05) effect on any pharmacokinetic parameters of sumatriptan both at 1000 and 2200 hours treatment. The results of this study suggest that no alteration in the sumatriptan dosage will be necessary for migraine patients taking naproxen prophylactic therapy.

Effect of encapsulation on absorption of sumatriptan tablets: data from healthy volunteers and patients during a migraine.

BACKGROUND: Some comparative trials of selective serotonin 1B/ID-agonists in migraine have reported -15% lower efficacy for sumatriptan tablets than that reported in placebo-controlled trials. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the encapsulation methods used to mask active drug may delay absorption of sumatriptan from dosing to 2 hours after dosing (the traditional end point in clinical trials of migraine treatment), an effect that may be enhanced by migraine-associated gastric stasis. METHODS: Two randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover trials were conducted to evaluate the absorption and bioequivalence of conventional 50-mg sumatriptan tablets and encapsulated 50-mg sumatriptan tablets in supine, fasted, healthy volunteers (Glaxo Wellcome protocol SUM40270) and supine patients experiencing a migraine (Glaxo Wellcome protocol SUM40268). Absorption was assessed by calculating the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to 2 hours after dosing (AUC2) and the times to first measurable plasma concentration, 10 ng/mL, 20 ng/mL, and maximum plasma concentration. Data for the AUC from time zero to infinity and maximum plasma concentration were used to assess standard bioequivalence, which is considered to occur when the 90% CIs for the geometric mean treatment ratios (test/reference) fall between 0.8 and 1.25. RESULTS: Study 1 included 26 healthy subjects (73% men, 27% women; mean age, 39.1 years), and study 2 included 30 patients with migraine (67% women, 33% men; mean age, 42.7 years). Sumatriptan absorption was delayed with the encapsulated tablet compared with the conventional tablet 0 to 2 hours after dosing, particularly during a migraine. AUC2 values with encapsulated sumatriptan compared with the conventional tablet were 21% lower in healthy volunteers (ratio of capsule/tablet, 0.79; 90% CI, 0.588-1.050) and 27% lower in patients experiencing a migraine (ratio of capsule/tablet, 0.73; 90% CI, 0.519-1.023). Standard bioequivalence was demonstrated in both healthy volunteers and patients experiencing a migraine. CONCLUSIONS: Encapsulation delayed absorption of sumatriptan 0 to 2 hours after dosing, particularly during a migraine. This delay in absorption of the encapsulated form may account for the lower efficacy of sumatriptan in some comparative studies.

The pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan when administered with norethindrone 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 0.035 mg in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Because the majority of migraineurs are young women in their peak reproductive years, it is important to understand the possible effects on the pharmacokinetics of both medications when sumatriptan is coadministered with an oral contraceptive (OC). OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of multiple dosing of the OC norethindrone 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 0.035 mg (NE/EE) on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan in healthy volunteers. Secondary objectives were to determine the effect of a single dose of sumatriptan on the multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of NE and EE, and to assess the safety and tolerability of the combination. METHODS: This was an open-label, 1-sequence, crossover study in healthy women who had been receiving NE/EE for at least 3 months. Subjects received 1 cycle of NE/EE, consisting of 21 days of OC and 7 days of placebo. They also received a single dose of sumatriptan 50 mg on the last day of the OC or placebo regimen. Blood samples for the determination of plasma sumatriptan concentrations were collected on days 21 and 28, and blood samples for the determination of plasma NE and EE concentrations were collected on days 20 and 21. Treatments were compared by analysis of variance. Equivalence between treatments was to be concluded if the 90% Cl for the ratio of reference to test means for log(e)-transformed parameters (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUCI and maximum measured plasma concentration [C(max)]) for each analyte fell within the interval 0.80 to 1.25. RESULTS: Twenty-six women (mean age, 29.8 years; age range, 18-44 years; weight range, 52-82 kg) participated in the study. The 90% CI for the ratio of reference to test means for the AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC(infinity)) of sumatriptan was 1.11 to 1.22, and the 90% CIs for the AUC over the dosing interval at steady state (AUC(tau)) of NE and EE were 0.96 to 1.00 and 0.91 to 0.97, respectively. The 90% CIs for the ratio of reference to test means for the C(max) of sumatriptan, NE, and EE were a respective 1.05 to 1.30, 0.76 to 0.88, and 0.88 to 1.04. Study treatments were well tolerated. Adverse events were mild or moderate, and there were no clinically significant changes in vital signs or laboratory values. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of absorption (AUC) of sumatriptan, NE, and EE was similar after oral administration of sumatriptan and NE/EE, both alone and in combination. Thus, in the opinion of the study investigators, there were no clinically relevant changes in the AUC of any of the medications when sumatriptan and NE/EE were administered concomitantly compared with administration alone. The results of this study suggest that dose adjustment is not necessary when sumatriptan is administered concomitantly with NE/EE in healthy premenopausal women.

Comparison of contractile responses to donitriptan and sumatriptan in the human middle meningeal and coronary arteries.

Donitriptan is a potent, high efficacy agonist at 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors. We investigated the contractile effects of donitriptan and sumatriptan on human isolated blood vessels of relevance to therapeutic efficacy in migraine (middle meningeal artery) and coronary adverse events (coronary artery). Furthermore, using the concentration-response curves in the middle meningeal artery, we predicted the plasma concentration needed for the therapeutic effect of donitriptan. Both donitriptan and sumatriptan contracted the middle meningeal artery with similar apparent efficacy (E(max): 103+/-8% and 110+/-12%, respectively), but the potency of donitriptan (pEC(50): 9.07+/-0.14) was significantly higher than that of sumatriptan (pEC(50): 7.41+/-0.08). In the coronary artery, the contraction to donitriptan was biphasic with a significantly higher maximal response (E(max): 29+/-6%) than sumatriptan (E(max): 14+/-2%; pEC(50): 5.71+/-0.16), yielding two distinct pEC(50) values (8.25+/-0.16 and 5.60+/-0.24). Incubation with the 5-HT(2) receptor antagonist ketanserin (10 microM) eliminated the low affinity component of the concentration-response curve of donitriptan and the resultant E(max) and pEC(50) were 9+/-2% and 7.33+/-0.21, respectively. Ketanserin was without effect on the sumatriptan-induced contraction. Based on the middle meningeal artery contraction, concentrations (C(max)) of donitriptan that may be expected to have a therapeutic efficacy equivalent to that of 50 and 100 mg sumatriptan are predicted to be around 2.5 and 4.3 nM, respectively. Such concentrations are likely to induce only a small coronary artery contraction of 2.9+/-1.5% and 3.8+/-2.0%, respectively; these are not different from those by C(max) concentrations of sumatriptan (1.7+/-0.4% or 2.2+/-0.4%). The present results suggest that, like sumatriptan, donitriptan exhibits cranioselectivity and would be effective in aborting migraine attacks with a similar coronary side-effect profile as sumatriptan.

Pharmacokinetic profile of a new form of sumatriptan tablets in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: Rapid delivery of migraine-specific medication to its site(s) of action is thought to be crucial in preventing or minimizing sensitization of central pain pathways and thereby in optimizing pain-free outcomes in patients with migraine. Sumatriptan has been developed as a new tablet formulation to enhance the rate of systemic drug delivery by improving tablet disintegration and drug dispersion relative to those of conventional tablets. These enhanced formulation characteristics may be beneficial during occurrences of the gastric stasis that can accompany migraine. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, 4-way crossover study (n = 32) was conducted to determine whether the new formulation of sumatriptan 50 and 100 mg is bioequivalent to sumatriptan conventional tablets and to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of the new formulation and the conventional tablet during the early (0-2 h) postdose interval in healthy volunteers. Pharmacokinetics during the early post-dose interval are important in determining a drug's onset of action, an important parameter to patients with migraine. RESULTS: The results confirm that the new formulation of sumatriptan and sumatriptan conventional tablets are bioequivalent as demonstrated by the finding that the 90% confidence intervals for the sumatriptan area under the concentration time curve to infinity and to the last evaluable time point (AUC(0- infinity ) and AUC(0-t), respectively) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) fell within the predetermined bounds defining bioequivalence (0.80-1.25) for both doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters measured early (0-2 h) after dosing reveal slightly faster absorption, on average, of the new sumatriptan formulation than sumatriptan conventional tablets although high intersubject variability was observed. For the new sumatriptan formulation, AUC(0-2) (AUC up to 2 h post dose) was, on average, 1% greater (50 mg) and 8% greater (100 mg) and maximal sumatriptan levels were attained, on average, 10 min earlier (50 mg) and 15 min earlier (100 mg) compared with the conventional tablet. Other measures including AUC(0-0.5) (AUC to 30 min post-dose), times to achieve sumatriptan concentrations of 5 and 10 ng/mL, and mean percentage C(max) 15, 20 and 30 min post-dose demonstrate an observable improvement in rate of drug absorption for the new form of sumatriptan compared with conventional tablets. CONCLUSION: The new form of sumatriptan is bioequivalent to sumatriptan conventional tablets and is absorbed more quickly than conventional tablets.

Quantitation of the 5HT1D agonists MK-462 and sumatriptan in plasma by liquid chromatography-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry.

The 5HT1D agonist sumatriptan is efficacious in the treatment of migraines. MK-462 is a drug of the same class which is under development in our laboratories. Bioanalytical methods of high efficiency, specificity and sensitivity were required to support the preclinical and clinical programs. These assays were based on HPLC with tandem MS-MS detection. MK-462 and sumatriptan were extracted using an automated solid-phase extraction technique on a C2 Varian Bond-Elut cartridge. The n-diethyl analogues of MK-462 and sumatriptan were used as internal standards. The analytes were chromatographed using reversed-phase (nitrile) columns coupled via a heated nebulizer interface to an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization source. The chromatographic run times were less than 7 min. Both methods were precise, accurate and selective down to plasma concentrations of 0.5 ng/ml. The assay for MK-462 was adapted to separately monitor the unlabeled and 14C-labeled species of the drug following intravenous administration of radiolabeled material to man.

High performance liquid chromatographic method for the determination of sumatriptan with fluorescence detection in human plasma.

A rapid and sensitive high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with fluorescence detection has been developed for the determination of sumatriptan in human plasma. The procedure involved a liquid-liquid extraction of sumatriptan and terazosin (internal standard) from human plasma with ethyl acetate. Chromatography was performed by isocratic reverse phase separation on a C18 column. Fluorescence detection was achieved with an excitation wavelength of 225 nm and an emission wavelength of 350 nm. The standard curve was linear over a working range of 1-100 ng/ml and gave an average correlation coefficient of 0.9997 during validation. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) of this method was 1 ng/ml. The absolute recovery was 92.6% for sumatriptan and 95.6% for the internal standard. The inter-day and intra-day precision and accuracy were between 0.8-3.3 and 1.1-6.3%, respectively. This method is simple, sensitive and suitable for pharmacokinetics or bioequivalence studies.

Fully automated assay for the determination of sumatriptan in human serum using solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection.

A method is described for a fully automated, sensitive, accurate and precise assay for the determination of sumatriptan in human serum. The assay consists of solid-phase extraction followed by reversed-phase HPLC with electrochemical detection. The extraction procedure has been fully automated on a Zymate XP robot linked on-line to the HPLC system. The assay is linear over the analytical range 1-30 ng ml-1 and selective for sumatriptan with respect to endogenous plasma components and GR49336, the major circulating metabolite. The intra-assay data demonstrate a maximum bias and precision across the calibration range of 10% and 6.6% respectively. The inter-assay data demonstrate a maximum bias and precision across the calibration range of 6.7% and 8.8%, respectively. The extraction efficiency of the assay is approximately 90% and is constant across the calibration range. The assay was used for the determination of sumatriptan in serum clinical samples and was shown to be robust in sustained use over several months. The use of a Zymate XP robot allowed complete automation of the assay, which resulted in high-quality, high-throughput analyses.