Does Maxillomandibular Fixation Technique Affect Occlusion Quality in Segmental LeFort I Osteotomy?

BACKGROUND: Segmental maxillary osteotomies require precise occlusal control due to variability in individual segment positioning. The role of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) technique on occlusal control has not been validated. PURPOSE: The purpose is to measure and compare the accuracy of occlusal positioning among MMF techniques. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This was a double-blinded in vitro study on experiment models to simulate a 3-piece LeFort I osteotomy. The models were constricted posteriorly and expanded using 3 different MMF techniques and compared to the unaltered baseline occlusion. Based on sample size calculation, 32 separate attempts were made for each MMF technique. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was MMF technique (brackets, MMF screws, and embrasure wires). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was the visual occlusal analysis score, a 1.00 to 4.00 continuous scale measuring the similarity of the achieved occlusion to the planned (control) occlusion assessed by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon and an orthodontist. High visual occlusal analysis score indicated greater occlusal accuracy, with 3.50 defined as the threshold for accuracy. The secondary outcome variable was the linear error of the achieved occlusion at the canine and first molar teeth, with lower error indicating greater accuracy. An a priori accuracy threshold of 0.5 mm was set for this variable. COVARIATES: None. ANALYSES: Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc testing was used to analyze the difference in the outcome variables of interest. P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-two attempts for each technique showed that brackets had higher VAOS than MMF screws and embrasure wires (median differences 1.49 and 0.48, P < .001), and had lower linear occlusal error (median differences 0.35 to 0.99 mm, P < .001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: MMF technique influences the quality of occlusal control, with greater visual rating scores and lower linear errors seen with brackets than with embrasure wires or MMF screws.

The Evaluation of Objective and Subjective Fate of Teeth in the Mandible Fracture Line and the Management-A Center's Experience.

OBJECTIVE: The decision to retain or extract teeth in the line of mandibular fractures has been a subject of debate in much of the scientific literature, and there is a need for further evidence to clear this issue. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate both the positive and negative effects of teeth in the line of mandibular fractures provide more evidence in this field, as well as take into consideration patients' quality of life after the surgery. METHODS: Patients after trauma with teeth in the line of mandibular fractures were included in this study. Open reduction and rigid internal fixation, elastic intermaxillary reduction were expected to achieve a satisfactory occlusion and/or anatomical reduction in the fragments as assessed by orthopantomogram, computed tomography scans, and clinical examination. The remaining cases had maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) with an arch bar and bridle wire. All the patients included in this study will take the Visual Analog Scale score evaluation before and after surgery subjectively to further verify the impact on their life qualify, as well as the further treatment needed. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients with teeth in the line of mandibular fractures were included in this study. Open reduction and rigid internal fixation was used in 37 patients, whereas another 35 patients accepted elastic intermaxillary reduction. Six cases underwent MMF. The number of involved teeth was 83. Three of the 83 teeth involved in the fracture lines healed with complications. In the cases where the teeth had been removed before fracture treatment, or in cases of delayed extractions, no complications were noted. The majority of the patients felt good about the whole treatment, however, 4 in the MMF group complained about worry about their oral health due to MMF leading to mouth open limitation. CONCLUSION: The factors that should be considered for removal include the condition of the teeth and alveolar bone, the timing and the type of treatment, as well as the patients' desire, if possible. This is an individual-based decision that needs to consider more objective and subjective potential risks to avoid complications.

Postoperative Intermaxillary Elastic Traction Contributes to the Stability of Absorbable Plates Fixation for Bilateral Mandibular Fracture.

The use of absorbable plates can be challenging for mandibular fractures involving bilateral dentition. Chewing and mouth opening movements may cause loosening or breakage of absorbable materials, leading to displacement of bone segments and resulting in malocclusion. The use of absorbable materials for bilateral mandibular fracture surgery itself raises concerns for surgeons. Timely intermaxillary elastic traction is essential for these patients after surgery to maintain correct occlusion. The surgical approaches were performed with intraoral mandibular sulcus incisions. During the surgery, intermaxillary fixation screws were implanted and steel wires were used for intermaxillary ligation and fixation to restore the occlusal. After the fractured segments were sequentially reduced, they were fixed with inion 2.0 absorbable plates. The patient underwent intermaxillary elastic traction for 1 week. Elastic mask was used to assist in stabilizing the position of the jawbone and maintaining occlusion. After discharge, the patient continued traction at home for 3 weeks before removing the intermaxillary fixation screws. The patient recovered well after surgery without any complications. The postoperative occlusal relationship is good. Postoperative CT showed good reduction of the fractured segments. For the case reported in this article, elastic traction was promptly implemented after surgery. We emphasize that restoring occlusion is always the treatment goal for jawbone fractures. We believe that keeping the intermaxillary fixation screws for a month is a wise choice to be prepared for unexpected needs.

Simple Method for Re-tightening IMF Wires without Breakage.

AIM: This clinical technique aims to retighten intermaxillary fixation (IMF) wires when loosened intra/postoperatively. BACKGROUND: Intermaxillary fixation is one of the most important steps to obtain stable and functional occlusion in maxillofacial trauma. However, IMF wires tend to loosen over time. This loosened wire is generally removed and a new wire is used for IMF. Removal and refixation is time-consuming for surgeon and unconformable for the patient. TECHNIQUE: We recommend a simple technique for re-tightening IMF wires without breakage, with the use of shepherd's crook explorer by making a small circular loop. CONCLUSION: This technique of re-tightening by looping further stretches and tightens the wire to regain stabilized occlusion with maximal intercuspation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This technique eliminates the need for removal and refixation of IMF wires, thereby improving patient comfort, yet obtaining stable occlusion over a long period of time. How to cite this article: Madhu SK, Dominic S, Baptist J, et al. Simple Method for Re-tightening IMF Wires without Breakage. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(3):289-291.

Comparison of Conventional Versus Right Angled Fixation Technique in Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures - A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study.

PURPOSE: The treatment of mandibular angle fractures ranges from observation to closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation to open reduction and internal fixation. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of three different techniques (transoral, transbuccal, and right-angled fixation technique) for single adaptational monocortical upper border plating in mandibular angle fracture. METHODS: The study conducted at our center was a prospective randomized study. The study duration was from November 2019 to August 2021. The three groups included in our study were transoral, transbuccal, and transoral approach using the right-angled drill. Patients who required open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular angle fracture were included in the study. Computer-generated randomization method was used to assign the participants among the 3 groups, ie, transoral, transbuccal, or right-angled fixation technique. The primary outcome clinical variables were mouth opening (MO), occlusion stability, scar or laceration, facial nerve weakness, infection, and the radiological variables were gap between the fracture segments and displacement of the fracture segment. The secondary outcome of our study is a comparison of the perioperative complications including plate exposure during the entire fracture healing period. The covariates of the study were age, sex, etiology, and tooth in line of fracture. Statistical analysis was done using ANOVA, post hoc Tukey test, and Pearson χ2 test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included in our study. According to randomization, each group was allotted 16 patients. In the study, 66.7% of the study population were male and 33.3% were female; 75% of the study population were victims of road traffic accidents, and 25% were injured due to assault. The mean and standard deviation for MO at 1 month were 31.3 ± 2.9 for the transoral group, 35.8 ± 1.7 for the transbuccal group, and 35.5 ± 1.3 for the right-angled fixation group. On intergroup comparison, statistically significant results were seen at the 1-month postoperative MO clinical parameter. The P value here was 0.02 which was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The comparison of the right-angled fixation technique to transoral and transbuccal fixation methods have not been documented. Our study is the first of its kind to compare the right-angled fixation technique to various other approaches. Our study showed that the MO was better postoperatively with the transbuccal approach. The other variables showed no difference among the three techniques.

What are the Effects of Internal Fixation on Trigeminal Neurosensory Function and the Temporomandibular Joints Following Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy?

PURPOSE: Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) has, traditionally, been accomplished without internal fixation, necessitating a period of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). With advances in instrumentation, internal fixation of IVRO is feasible, obviating the need for MMF. The purpose is to investigate the effects of transoral internal fixation on the prevalence of third division trigeminal nerve (CNV3) injury, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthralgia, and surgical site bleeding following IVRO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent IVRO at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between January 2017 and December 2020. The primary predictor variable was fixation status-internal fixation versus MMF. The primary outcome variable was postoperative CNV3 neurosensory disturbance. The secondary outcome variables were TMJ arthralgia and surgical site bleeding. Statistical analysis included Fisher's exact test and McNemar's Chi-squared test. RESULTS: Seventy two subjects (59 IVROs without internal fixation and 65 IVROs with internal fixation) were studied. The frequency of CNV3 neurosensory deficit was 0% in the IVRO without internal fixation group and 3.1% in the IVRO with internal fixation group (P = .49). Within group analysis showed a decreased frequency of postoperative TMJ arthralgia compared to preoperative records in both groups (IVRO without internal fixation group, P = .04 and IVRO with internal fixation group, P = .004). The frequency of active surgical site bleeding controlled with local measures was 1.7% in the IVRO without internal fixation group and 3.1% in the IVRO with internal fixation group (P = 1). CONCLUSION: Internal fixation of IVRO is associated with low incidence of neurosensory deficit, TMJ arthralgia, and active surgical site bleeding.

Can Fracture Reduction be Attempted Through a 3D-Printed Guide Template Without Maxillomandibular Fixation?

BACKGROUND: Computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) is widely used in clinical practice. This technology may change existing methods for mandibular fracture management. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in-vitro study was to determine if the reduction for mandibular symphysis fracture can be performed without maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) using 3-dimensional (3D)-printed template. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE: This in-vitro study was designed as a proof-of-concept. The sample was composed of 20 existing pairs of intraoral scan and computed tomography (CT) data. A mandibular model stereolithography (STL) file was created by merging the STL file obtained for the bimaxillary dentitions with the CT DICOM file, and this was set as the original model. Using the original model, a STL file of a fracture model of the mandibular symphysis was created using CAD. A template similar to a wafer or an implant guide was manufactured to restore original occlusion, and the mandibular fracture model was reduced and fixed using the 3D-printed template and wire. This was set as the experimental group. The 3D coordinate system error was measured at 6 landmarks and statistically compared using scan data between models of the groups. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Reduction techniques with MMF or without MMF using guide template for mandibular fracture model. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The 3D coordinate system error (mm). COVARIATES: The position of landmarks. ANALYSES: The Mann-Whitney U test, student's t-test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test were used to analyze the coordinate errors between the landmarks. A P value of < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The 3D error value of the control and experimental group were 1.06 ± 0.63 mm (range: 0.11 to 2.92 mm) and 0.96 ± 0.48 mm (range: 0.2 to 2.95 mm), respectively. There was no statistical difference between the control and experimental group. There was a statistically significant difference in the lower 2 and lower 3 landmarks compared to the upper 1 (P = .001 and .000, respectively) before and after the reduction in the experimental group. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that the reduction using a 3D-printed guide template for the mandibular symphysis fracture could be possible even without the MMF.

Does a Short Period of Maxillomandibular Fixation Decrease Complications in Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures?

PURPOSE: A short duration of postoperative maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) has the potential to reduce complications following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular angle fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine if a short duration of MMF is associated with a reduced rate of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) in patients with mandibular angle fractures undergoing ORIF. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study consisting of patients treated with ORIF for mandibular angle fractures from August 1, 2015 to May 31, 2020 at an urban, level 1 trauma center. Patients under the age of 18 years, bilateral angle fractures, those with MMF periods of more than 3 weeks, and those patients without documentation of the duration of MMF were excluded from the study. The primary predictor variable was the use of a short duration (less than 2 weeks) of postoperative MMF. The outcome variable of interest was the presence of POICs. Categorical covariates were compared using Fisher's exact tests, while continuous variables were compared using Wilcox rank-sum tests. Multivariable logistic regression adjustment was also performed. RESULTS: There were 307 patients included in the study, 84.4% of which were men. The average age was 32.5 years. Patients with a short duration of MMF had a POIC rate of 8.3% compared to 18.2% for no MMF (P = .08). In the adjusted analysis, patients with a short duration of MMF time had a significant decrease in POIC risk compared to no MMF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11 to 0.97). Other significant variables in the regression analysis included plating type and noncompliance. Inferior border rigid fixation was associated with decreased POIC risk compared to ladder plates and lateral border plates (aOR 5.8, 95% CI = 1.8 to 18.4 and aOR 5.1, 95% CI = 1.4 to 18.7, respectively). CONCLUSION: The findings from our study suggest that a short duration of postoperative MMF may reduce POICs following ORIF of mandibular angle fractures.

The Assessment of Intermaxillary Fixation and Open Reduction Using Skeletal Anchorage System Compared With Arch Bar in Mandible Fracture Based on CT Image.

BACKGROUND: There are many different techniques to achieve intermaxillary fixation (IMF) for open reduction of mandible fractures. The arch bar has long been used as the gold standard of IMF to assist open reduction. However, owing to its long operating time, risk of needle stick injury, and gingival trauma, surgeons looked into different treatment options for IMF, such as the skeletal anchorage system (SAS). Therefore, this study aimed to compare the stability between IMF with arch bar and IMF with SAS based on computed tomography image. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, postoperative computed tomography and panoramic radiographs were taken 1 week and 6 months after surgery, respectively. The treatment of mandibular fractures using IMF with arch bar and SAS were compared by evaluating changes in the dental midlines and condyle positions. Thirty patients with mandibular fractures were enrolled into 2 groups-IMF with arch bar and IMF with SAS. RESULTS: The arch bar showed slightly more deviation in dental midline. In SAS, the condyle moved more medially compared with the arch bar. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletal anchorage system could be used for IMF with reliable stability in mandible fracture. There were no significant differences in the treatment outcome between the 2 groups.

Facial Trauma Management During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

IMPORTANCE: Facial trauma is managed with open or closed treatment modalities; however, the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on facial trauma management remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the management of facial trauma varied during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review of 127 adults at The R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland between March 2019 and March 2021. Adults were stratified into pre-COVID (before March 2020) and post-COVID groups. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Open reduction internal fixation alone, maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) alone, Open reduction internal fixation and MMF, and closed reduction. RESULTS: Of the 127 patients, 66 were treated pre-COVID (52%) and 61 post-COVID (48%). While the prevalence of mandible fractures did not differ (pre-COVID, n = 39, 59%; post-COVID, n = 42, 69%; P = 0.33), the use of MMF alone decreased (pre-COVID, n = 9, 23%; post-COVID, n = 1, 2%; P = 0.005). In contrast, while the prevalence of displaced nasal bone fractures decreased (pre-COVID, n = 21, 32%; post-COVID, n = 4, 7%; P = 0.0007), management with closed reduction did not differ (pre-COVID, n = 23, 96%; post-COVID, n = 11, 85%; P = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although the clinical characteristics of patients with facial fractures did not differ during the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of MMF for mandible fractures changed significantly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress occurring in the fixation systems both developed in various geometric designs for this study and currently used in sagittal split ramus advancement osteotomy using finite element analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The finite element model that imitates three-dimensional sagittal split advancement osteotomy was fixed in 10 different miniplate fixation methods: one miniplate fixed with four monocortical screws in a horizontal and oblique pattern; four-hole two miniplates with eight monocortical screws; five-hole miniplate fixed with four monocortical and one bicortical screws; six-hole straight and curved miniplates fixed with six monocortical screws in different geometric designs. Unilateral masticatory muscle loads that have previously determined in the literature were applied to the model at the anatomical muscle attachment regions and the data obtained from finite element analysis and static linear analysis methods were recorded as Von mises, maximum principle and minimum principle stress values. RESULTS: It was observed from the results that maximum stress occurred in Group 1, which consisted of double backward T-shaped miniplate with 6-holes and, minimum stress occured in group 10, which mimiced hybrid system with one miniplate and four monocortical and one bicortical screws. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, the stress on the miniplates changes according to the geometric designs and the stress on the miniplate decreases as the numbers of miniplates and bars increase. The hybrid miniplate may be preferred by the surgeon as it will be exposed to less stress in excessive mandibular advancements by using the advantages of both the miniplate and the bicortical screw.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Screw-retained Arch Bar vs Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

AIM: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of a conventional Erich's arch bar vs a modified screw-retained arch bar in maxillomandibular fixation of mandibular fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This parallel-arm randomized control trial included patients from the outpatient clinic with single favorable mandibular fractures that are indicated for closed reduction. They were subjected to maxillomandibular fixation using conventional Erich's arch bars in the control group and modified screw-retained arch bars in the study group. The outcome measures included operating time, glove perforations, postoperative pain, oral hygiene, fixation stability, occlusion, and mucosal coverage. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients (12 males and 8 females) with a 1:1 allocation ratio were included. There was a significant statistical difference regarding operation time and number of glove perforations in favor of group B as p < 0.001, p = 0.007, respectively. There was a significant statistical difference regarding pain after 1 day (p < 0.001), 1 week (p < 0.001) in favor of group B, and at 4 weeks (p = 0.015), and 6 weeks (p = 0.002) in favor of group A. Regarding oral hygiene at 1 week (p = 0.021) and at 6 weeks (p < 0.001), there was a significant statistical difference in favor of group B. Regarding mucosal coverage at 6 weeks, there was a significant statistical difference in favor of group A (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The modified screw-retained arch bar can be considered an alternative to conventional arch bar as it provided less application time and better operator safety. It also showed better patient satisfaction regarding pain and oral hygiene. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Maxillomandibular fixation with the conventional technique was modified to screw-retained arch bar which is less time-consuming and provides better patient and operator satisfaction. How to cite this article: Elhadidi MH, Awad S, Elsheikh HAE, et al. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Screw-retained Arch Bar vs Conventional Erich's Arch Bar in Maxillomandibular Fixation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2023;24(12):928-935.

The Role of Dental Occlusion Ties to Achieve Stable Maxillomandibular Fixation During Temporomandibular Joint Replacement.

Dental occlusion ties (Minne Ties®) are a new example of the concept of an oral zip tie used to establish maxillomandibular fixation (MMF). Each tie uses a blunt introducer that is easily passed between embrasures and fed through a self-locking, unidirectional clasp. Five to six ties are used to establish MMF. They are fast, easy to use, and relatively safe because there are no sharps or wires associated with their use. The authors report their experience using this MMF method for temporomandibular joint replacement surgery, where over the last 2 years, over 65 collective cases have been completed using this method.

Does Maxillomandibular Fixation Affect Respiratory Function? A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: This systematic review was carried out to determine if maxillomandibular fixation, used in the treatment of maxillary fractures, interferes with respiratory function, and appraised studies that evaluated pulmonary function using spirometry on patients with and without maxillomandibular fixation. Searches were conducted on the following databases: Medline/Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, and Scielo, in addition to a search of the grey literature and a manual search. Five studies were included in the qualitative analysis, but it was not possible to conduct a quantitative study due to the lack of data. Forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in the first second, the ratio of these values, and peak expiratory flow were the parameters studied. In all the studies included in this review, it was possible to observe the lowest respiratory parameter values during maxillomandibular fixation and, after removal, normal respiratory function was restored. Accordingly, it was possible to conclude that maxillo-mandibular fixation temporarily affects respiratory function, during use, but it is restored on removal, therefore, not precluding its use on healthy patients who have good nasal breathing prior to the procedure. However, in patients suffering from some form of respiratory limitation or pulmonary disease, and also mouth breathers, maxillomandibular fixation should not be used so as to avoid more severe respiratory complications, underlining the importance of preoperative pulmonary evaluation.

Many Moving Pieces: Virtual Preoperative Surgical Planning for Traumatic Occlusal Splints.

INTRODUCTION: Achieving anatomic reduction and re-establishing premorbid occlusion in patients with complex maxillomandibular fractures is challenging even for seasoned surgeons. Historically, surgeons have utilized occlusal splints to help establish occlusal relationships before fracture reduction and fixation. These acrylic splints are fabricated from dental impressions and require manual repositioning of tooth bearing segments along the fracture line to reapproximate premorbid occlusion. The process is laborious, requires a dental lab, and is less efficacious in edentulous patients or those with significantly comminuted fractures; as such it has largely fallen out of practice. Recently, with advances in virtual 3D modeling and printing, we demonstrate that occlusal splints can be designed from computed tomography scans, manipulated virtually, and printed without obtaining impressions from the patient. METHODS/RESULTS: In our series of 3 patients with complex maxillomandibular fractures, occlusal splints were created by 1) obtaining maxillofacial computed tomography scans, 2) reducing the fractures virtually, and 3) using orthognathic virtual surgery software to create the splint. The time between planning and delivery of the splint was 4 to 7 days. These splints were successfully utilized to help establish premorbid occlusion in conjunction with maxillomandibular fixation and aided in expeditious intraoperative fracture reduction and fixation. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of complex facial fractures, occlusal splints can be a useful adjunct in the operative reduction and fixation of fractures. With the advent of virtual preoperative surgical planning via 3D modeling and 3D printing, these occlusal splints can be created of a sufficient fidelity to avoid the strict need for dental impressions.

Management of Mandible Angle Fractures With a Right Angle Drill: Description of Technique.

ABSTRACT: Management of mandible angle fractures can be challenging within the confines of the oral cavity where the use of linear instruments may result in structural weakness or malalignment secondary to improper placement. A right angle drill can facilitate a more ergonomic approach, with direct perpendicular placement of the instrument over the angle fracture. In addition, local soft tissue strain is minimized, and the need for a transcutaneous exposure can be avoided for additional plate placement. The right angle drill technique is simple, reproducible, and can be easily incorporated into routine mandible angle fracture management.

Change of the Inclination Angle in a Pediatric Bilateral Condylar Fracture Treated With Intermaxillary Fixation and an Occlusal Stop.

ABSTRACT: This paper presents the outcomes of a pediatric bilateral condylar fracture treated with intermaxillary fixation (IMF) and an occlusal stop.A 6-year-old girl presented with the complaint of pain on her chin. She had fallen down, whereas riding a bicycle and her face hit the road. She had limited mouth-opening (10 mm). Panoramic radiography and computed tomography confirmed a bilateral con-dylar fracture. The inclination of the fractured condyle (IFC) was 39.2° and 42.4° on the left and right sides, respectively. On the third post-trauma day, arch bars were applied and IMF was performed with a prefabricated wafer (occlusal stop) and rubber bands. The rubber bands were changed to wires on post-IMF day (PMF) 4.Immediately after IMF, the IFCs increased (left: 50.1° and right: 68.1°). On PMF 1, the IFCs had improved (44.5° and 46.9°, respectively). On PMF 3, 12, 28, and 35, the left and right IFCs were 46.9° and 70.7°,38.9° and 72.0°,38.0° and 56.5°, and 36.4° and 44.6°, respectively. On PMF 42, the IFCs had changed to 34.5° and 36.1 °, and wires were changed to rubber bands. On PMF 49, the IFCs were 34.0° and 36.5°, and rubber bands were applied at night only. On PMF 56, the IFCs had improved to 35.0° and 34.8°, and the arch bars were removed. The changes of IFC were fitted to an exponential regression model (left: y = 44.134e 0.005x and right: y = 11.378e 0.043x ).This case shows that pediatric bilateral mandibular condyle fractures can be treated by vertical lengthening using an occlusal stop and IMF.

Novel and Affordable Low-Cost Technique for Fixation of Parasymphyseal Fractures in Infants With Unerupted Dentition.

PURPOSE: Pediatric mandibular fractures are immensely challenging compared to adult fractures. The current update management spectrum ranges from the conservative one in the form of soft diet and regular follow-up, or less invasive surgical intervention by closed reduction and nonrigid fixation, to open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws. In this study, we investigated the use of a straightforward fabricated mold for the parasymphyseal mandibular fracture in infants with an unerupted dentition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on 8 infants presenting with parasymphyseal fractures with unerupted dentitions in our specialized trauma center. In the operating room before the induction of anesthesia, the authors used a straightforward plastic airway to create a splint. The curved part was split into 2 transverse halves making 2 U-shaped curved pieces that were utilized as a mold. Intraoperatively, the U-shaped piece was placed over the mandible and stabilized with circummandibular wires. This molded airway is used to stabilize the fracture site for 2-3 weeks. The average period of follow-up was around 6 months. RESULTS: The average time of mandibular fixation was 17.6 ± 2.4 SD (14 to 20) days. The mean of the total operative time was 38.7 ± 3.5 SD minutes, ranging from 35 to 45 minutes. Our infants were observed in the outpatient clinic for 6 months postoperatively during the follow-up period. There were no noticeable complications nor any interference with tooth eruption or mandibular growth. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that this technique is straightforward to use and affordable. It does not require a long learning period. It also exhibits the advantage of reducing the cost in many developing countries.

Anatomical Location of Initial and Repeat Mandible Fractures: A 5-Year, Multi-Institution Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate new fracture patterns resulting from low velocity mechanisms in subjects who had previously fractured their mandible and had been treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or closed reduction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study was designed to analyze subjects presenting at 2 tertiary care centers with mandibular fractures with specific interest in subjects who had repeat mandible fractures. Variables recorded included demographic (age, sex, etc) data, fracture location of all fractures treated, and the location of previous fracture. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were completed of the data. RESULTS: The sample included a total of 492 subjects and 875 total fractures from both institutions. Four hundred fourty-four (91.1%) were male. The average age of all subjects was 36.4 ± 14.9 years. Twenty-six (5.28%) subjects were previously treated for a mandible fracture. All subjects' subsequent fractures occurred outside of previous ORIF except for 1 subject. Original fracture location (P = .596) and previous ORIF type (P = .689) did not influence if the subsequent fracture was within a site of previous ORIF. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that repeat mandible fractures are relatively rare, likely to occur only 5% of the time at large tertiary care centers. The repeat fracture is not likely to occur in a site of previous ORIF, regardless of the ORIF modality. Furthermore, the fracture is likely to occur on the contralateral side. This is 1 of the largest data sets on repeat mandible fractures, which, given their rarity, are difficult to study.

Does Dynamic Intermaxillary Fixation With Elastics Improve Outcomes Following Unilateral Condylar Fracture?

PURPOSE: The use of rigid versus semi-rigid intermaxillary fixation (IMF) following subcondylar fractures is controversial. This study aims to investigate whether the "dynamic" elastic fixation technique improves the outcomes, compared to the rigid fixation technique for the treatment of displaced subcondylar fractures in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This nonblinded randomized clinical trial was performed on adult patients with unilateral displaced mandibular subcondylar fractures. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 17). The primary predictor variable was wire versus elastic IMF. Changes in primary (mouth opening) and secondary (other clinical and radiological) outcomes were recorded. Data were analyzed with the t test and Mann-Whitney test with SPSS software version 20. P-value < .05 considered as significant. RESULTS: In this study 34 patients (with mean age of 33.03 ± 1.79, 23.5% females & 76.5% males) in two groups (Elastics & Wire) followed up to 6 months. The Elastics group showed significant improvement in mouth opening (primary outcome) after 1 month of follow-up, but the differences were not significant at the end of the study. In terms of secondary outcomes, the ramus height shortening compared to the opposite side revealed favorable improvement in the Elastics group in the period of study. The differences between the two groups in the lateral movement and protrusive movement were significant in favor of the Elastics group. The differences in pain, fracture displacement, and midline deviation between study groups were not significant at the end of the study. Just 1 case with malocclusion was observed in the Wire group. Patients were more satisfied with dynamic nonrigid IMF with elastics. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study showed that using the dynamic IMF technique is more tolerable, and patients have better functional and clinical outcomes during and at the end treatment.