Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am Heart J ; 233: 132-140, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359780

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the temporal patterns of health resource utilization (HRU) and expenditures around paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) diagnosis. This study assessed the longitudinal trends in HRU and expenditures in the 3 years preceding and subsequent to PSVT diagnosis. METHODS: Adult patients (age 18-65 years) with newly diagnosed PSVT were identified using administrative claims from the IBM MarketScan Research Database between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2016 and propensity-score matched (1:1) with non-PSVT controls. RESULTS: Among the 12,305 PSVT patients compared with matched controls, PSVT was associated with statistically significant higher annual rates of emergency department visits, physician office visits, inpatient hospitalizations, and diagnostic testing. HRU increased in the years preceding PSVT diagnosis, reaching its peak in the year following PSVT diagnosis. Over the 6-year follow-up period, PSVT was associated with higher mean annual per patient expenditures ($12,665) compared to matched controls ($6,004; P < .001). Upon diagnosis of PSVT, the mean expenditures per PSVT patient doubled from $11,714 in the year immediately preceding index diagnosis to $23,335 in the first postdiagnosis year. Inpatient services, diagnostic testing, and ablation procedures were the principle drivers of higher mean expenditures in the first year post-PSVT diagnosis versus the year prior to PSVT diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: PSVT presents a substantial economic burden to health care systems. The annual expenditure per PSVT patient is within the range previously reported for atrial fibrillation. The increased HRU and expenditures in the year following diagnosis, which do not return to baseline, suggest a potential gap in non-interventional, long-term PSVT management.


Asunto(s)
Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Taquicardia Paroxística/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taquicardia Paroxística/epidemiología , Taquicardia Paroxística/terapia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Supraventricular/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
Am J Cardiol ; 125(2): 215-221, 2020 01 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31771758

RESUMEN

Information on paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) patient characteristics and the associated economic burden of the disease is limited. Therefore, we sought to characterize newly diagnosed PSVT patients and quantify their healthcare resource use and expenditures. We used enrollment, demographic, and claims data from IBM MarketScan Research Database and Medicare Limited Data Set (LDS) to identify patients newly diagnosed with PSVT (ICD-9: 427.0; ICD-10: I47.1) from 10/1/2012 to 9/30/2016. Patients were required to be observable 1-year before and after index diagnosis. Patients were stratified by age (<65 years and ≥65 years), and propensity-matched to patients without PSVT. Expenditures and healthcare resource use were analyzed 1 year before and 1-year following index diagnosis. Among 49,316 patients <65 years and 23,954 patients ≥65 years, most were female (64% and 63%, respectively). Compared with matched controls, all PSVT patients had significantly more emergency department visits pre- and postdiagnosis, and more hospitalizations following diagnosis. Mean annual per patient expenditures paid by insurers were significantly higher in the year post-PSVT diagnosis, tripling for patients <65 years ($9,028 to $29,867) and nearly doubling for patients ≥65 years ($10,867 to $20,143). Spending for PSVT services accounted for 43% and 33% of the increase in expenditures in these patient-groups, respectively. Few patients had an ablation within 1 year of diagnosis, although ablations were more frequent in patients age <65 years (13% vs 3%). In conclusion, PSVT imposes a substantial economic burden, with increases in expenditures following initial diagnosis in both younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients who are not accounted for by cardiac ablation spending alone.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/economía , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Taquicardia Paroxística/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Supraventricular/diagnóstico , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Taquicardia Paroxística/economía , Taquicardia Paroxística/cirugía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo
5.
Heart ; 103(18): 1413-1418, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27613170

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Supraventricular tachycardias (SVTs) are a common cause of acute hospital presentations. Adenosine is an effective treatment. To date, no studies have directly compared paramedic-with hospital-delivered treatment of acute SVT with adenosine. METHOD: Randomised controlled trial comparing the treatment of SVT and discharge by paramedics with conventional emergency department (ED)-based care. Patients were excluded if they had structural heart disease or contraindication to adenosine. Discharge time, follow-up management, costs and patient satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were enrolled: 44 were randomised to paramedic-delivered adenosine (PARA) and 42 to conventional care (ED). Of the 37 patients in the PARA group given adenosine, the tachycardia was successfully terminated in 81%. There was a 98% correlation between the paramedics' ECG diagnosis and that of two electrophysiologists. No patients had any documented adverse events in either group. The discharge time was lower in the PARA group than in the ED group (125 min (range 55-9513) vs 222 min (range 72-26 153); p=0.01), and this treatment strategy was more cost-effective (£282 vs £423; p=0.01). The majority of patients preferred this management approach. Being treated and discharged by paramedics did not result in the patients being less likely to receive ongoing management of their arrhythmia and cardiology follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SVT can effectively and safely be treated with adenosine delivered by trained paramedics. Implementation of paramedic-delivered acute SVT care has the potential to reduce healthcare costs without compromising patient care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02216240.


Asunto(s)
Adenosina/administración & dosificación , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Electrocardiografía/efectos de los fármacos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Taquicardia Supraventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 19(6): 1303-9, 1992 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1564231

RESUMEN

Patients with accessory pathway-mediated supraventricular tachycardia have typically been treated with drugs or surgery. Although catheter ablation using high voltage direct current shocks has been used to treat patients with drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia, there are associated disadvantages, including damage due to barotrauma as well as the need for general anesthesia. Recently, transcatheter radiofrequency energy has evolved as an alternative to direct current shock or surgery to ablate accessory pathways. Percutaneous catheter ablation of 109 accessory pathways with use of radiofrequency energy was attempted in 100 consecutive patients. Patient age ranged from 3 to 67 years. The patients had been treated for recurrent tachycardia with a mean of 2.7 +/- 0.2 antiarrhythmic agents that either proved ineffective or caused unacceptable side effects. In seven patients previous attempts at accessory pathway ablation with use of direct current shock had been unsuccessful. Forty-five (41%) of the pathways were left free wall, 43 (40%) were septal and 21 (19%) were right free wall. Eighty-nine (89%) of the 100 patients had successful radiofrequency ablation at the time of hospital discharge. In all but 12 patients the ablation was accomplished in a single session. Complications attributable to the procedure, but not to the ablation itself, occurred in four patients (4%). No patient developed atrioventricular block or other cardiac arrhythmias. Over a mean follow-up period of 10 months, nine patients had some return of accessory pathway conduction; a repeat ablation procedure was successful in all five patients in whom it was attempted. It is concluded that a catheter ablation procedure using radiofrequency energy can be performed on accessory pathways in all locations. The procedure is effective and safer, less costly and more convenient than cardiac surgery and can be considered as an alternative to lifelong medical therapy in any patient with symptomatic accessory pathway-mediated tachycardia.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/anomalías , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/cirugía , Terapia por Radiofrecuencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/economía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Niño , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Electrocardiografía , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Ondas de Radio/efectos adversos , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Supraventricular/etiología , Taquicardia Supraventricular/fisiopatología , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirugía
7.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 129(5): 997-1005, 2005 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15867772

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atrial tachyarrhythmia is the most common complication after general thoracic surgery and is associated with significant morbidity, longer hospital stay, and higher costs. We sought to determine whether the use of antiarrhythmic medications is associated with a reduced rate of postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmia. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of clinical trials (1980-2003), and reference lists of relevant articles were searched for randomized controlled trials with placebo control, general thoracic patients, and noncombined and prophylactic use of the medications. Search, data abstraction, and analyses were performed and confirmed by at least 2 authors. A fixed-effects model was used to perform meta-analyses. RESULTS: There were 11 unique trials (total n = 1294) that met the inclusion criteria. Calcium-channel blockers and beta-blockers reduced the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia in 4 and 2 trials, respectively (relative risk of 0.50 and 95% confidence interval of 0.34-0.73; relative risk of 0.40 and 95% confidence interval of 0.17-0.95, respectively). However, beta-blockers tended to increase the risk of pulmonary edema (relative risk, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-6.23). Magnesium tested in one unblinded trial also reduced the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia (relative risk, 0.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.78). On the other hand, digitalis preparations were found to be harmful because they increased the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmia in 3 trials (relative risk, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.28). Finally, 2 other medications, flecainide and amiodarone, were each tested in a single small trial, and their effects were associated with great uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Calcium-channel blockers and beta-blockers are effective in reducing postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmia. The use of these medications should be individualized, and possible adverse events of beta-blockers should be taken into account. Randomized clinical trials do not support the use of digitalis in general thoracic surgery. The value of magnesium as a supplement to a main prophylactic regimen should be explored.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/prevención & control , Aleteo Atrial/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Premedicación/métodos , Taquicardia Supraventricular/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/efectos adversos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Amiodarona/uso terapéutico , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/etiología , Aleteo Atrial/economía , Aleteo Atrial/epidemiología , Aleteo Atrial/etiología , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Glicósidos Digitálicos/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Flecainida/uso terapéutico , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Premedicación/economía , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Supraventricular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Am J Cardiol ; 80(12): 1551-7, 1997 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9416934

RESUMEN

This study assessed the cost effectiveness of inpatient antiarrhythmic therapy initiation for supraventricular tachycardias using a metaanalysis of proarrhythmic risk and a decision analysis that compared inpatient to outpatient therapy initiation. A MEDLINE search of trials of antiarrhythmic therapy for supraventricular tachycardias was performed, and episodes of cardiac arrest, sudden or unexplained death, syncope, and sustained or unstable ventricular arrhythmias were recorded. A weighted average event rate, by sample size, was calculated and applied to a clinical decision model of therapy initiation in which patients were either hospitalized for 72 hours or treated as outpatients. Fifty-seven drug trials involving 2,822 patients met study criteria. Based on a 72-hour weighted average event rate of 0.63% (95% confidence interval, 0.2% to 1.2%), inpatient therapy initiation cost $19,231 per year of life saved for a 60-year-old patient with a normal life expectancy. Hospitalization remained cost effective when event rates and life expectancies were varied to model hypothetical clinical scenarios. For example, cost-effectiveness ratios for a 40-year-old without structural heart disease and a 60-year-old with structural heart disease were $37,510 and $33,310, respectively, per year of life saved. Thus, a 72-hour hospitalization for antiarrhythmic therapy initiation is cost effective for most patients with supraventricular tachycardias.


Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Taquicardia Supraventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taquicardia Supraventricular/complicaciones , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía
9.
Am J Cardiol ; 82(5): 589-93, 1998 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9732885

RESUMEN

We prospectively compared the impact on quality of life and cost effectiveness between ablation and medication as an initial strategy for patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Seventy-nine consecutive patients with newly documented paroxysmal SVT were treated with either ablation or medication. Health surveys (SF-36 and disease-specific questions) were obtained at baseline and after 12 months of follow up. Cost of health care utilization for the 6 months before and after treatment were measured. Both medication and ablation improved quality of life. However, ablation improved quality of life in more general health categories than medication. At follow up, ablation was associated with significantly improved quality of life in the bodily pain (63+/-24 vs 81+/-20, p <0.005), general health (69+/-21 vs 79+/-21, p <0.05), vitality (55+/-21 vs 66+/-22, p <0.05), and role emotion (78+/-36 vs 94+/-17, p <0.05) categories when compared with medication. Although both medication and ablation decreased frequency of disease-specific symptoms, ablation resulted in complete amelioration of symptoms in more patients (33% vs 74%). Potential long-term costs were similar for medication and ablation. In conclusion, ablation improves health-related quality of life to a greater extent, and in more aspects of general and disease-specific health than medication.


Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/economía , Ablación por Catéter/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Calidad de Vida , Taquicardia Paroxística/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Actividades Cotidianas/clasificación , Adulto , Anciano , Antiarrítmicos/efectos adversos , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , New Mexico , Satisfacción del Paciente/economía , Taquicardia Paroxística/terapia , Taquicardia Supraventricular/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Pharmacotherapy ; 16(5): 861-8, 1996.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8888080

RESUMEN

Verapamil and diltiazem are effective in terminating paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias and slowing ventricular response during atrial fibrillation or flutter. Results from clinical trials for each individual drug demonstrate comparative efficacy rates, and both drugs share the same contraindications and relative precautions. Well-designed comparative clinical trials are needed to establish if either drug has any clinical advantages in a particular patient population.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Diltiazem/uso terapéutico , Taquicardia Supraventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Verapamilo/uso terapéutico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/economía , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Diltiazem/economía , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Verapamilo/economía
11.
Clin Cardiol ; 19(7): 575-8, 1996 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8818439

RESUMEN

Clinical cardiac electrophysiology is a relatively new discipline, heavily dependent upon new technology that is often expensive. In cardiac pacing, no effective alternative to permanent pacing usually exists for patients with Class I indications, so cost-reduction strategies involve appropriate selection and utilization of hardware and facilities. Cost-effective utilization of radiofrequency ablation and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators requires that these techniques be compared with alternative therapies, usually antiarrhythmic drugs. Both ablation and defibrillator implantation can be shown to be cost effective in selected populations, but a cost-conscious approach to procedures and patient selection can make them cost effective in a broad range of patients.


Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/economía , Ablación por Catéter/economía , Desfibriladores Implantables/economía , Arritmias Cardíacas/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/terapia
14.
Pediatr Cardiol ; 27(4): 434-9, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16830085

RESUMEN

The objective of this study is to provide results and costs of catheter ablation in children and adolescents in a low-income country. Reports from first-world countries have demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) compared to medical treatment of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). The study included 28 patients younger than 18 years of age with SVT in a pediatric cardiology unit in Guatemala. All patients underwent RFCA. Clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of RFCA compared to continued medical treatment were the end points. Twenty-four patients had successful ablation (85.7%). Mean age at RFCA was 11.42 +/- 3.49 years. Three patients underwent a second ablation, increasing the success rate to 96.4%. One remaining patient is awaiting a second procedure. At a mean follow-up of 13.69 +/- 7.16 months, all 27 patients who had a successful ablation remained in sinus rhythm. Mean cost per procedure was 4.9 times higher than that of medical treatment. However, the estimated cost of catheter ablation equal that of medical therapy after 5.1 years and is 3.4 times less after 20 years. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of SVT in children and adolescents is safe and cost-effective compared to medical therapy. Resources must be judiciously allocated, especially in low-income countries, to treat the largest number of pediatric patients.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirugía , Adolescente , Antiarrítmicos/economía , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Guatemala , Humanos , Masculino , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taquicardia Supraventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Aust N Z J Med ; 23(4): 433-6, 1993 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8240167

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The recent advent of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation as a curative therapy for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias has challenged the role of long term drug treatment, which is essentially a palliative therapy. To date, however, no data have been published on the cost-effectiveness of RF ablation as compared with drug treatment in the Australian setting. AIMS: The study aimed to compare actual and projected costs of these two treatment options in a consecutive group of patients having RF ablation as treatment for symptomatic tachyarrhythmias. METHODS: The cost effectiveness of RF catheter ablation was assessed in 26 patients having RF ablation, using a hypothetical model of continued drug therapy in the same group of patients. A 'cost saving' criterion was used for cost effectiveness. Actual costs for the RF ablation and for continued drug therapy were based on data from medical records and from the answers to a detailed patient questionnaire. Analysis included costs of prior diagnostic electrophysiology (EP) study (17/26 patients), general anaesthesia (GA: 20/26 patients), post-ablation echocardiography (10/26 patients), and late follow-up EP study (7/26 patients). The in-hospital stay for the RF ablation was two days in all cases, and no patient required implantation of a permanent pacemaker. The RF ablation procedure was successful in 23/26 patients (88.5%) with late recurrence of tachycardia in one patient. After a median follow-up of nine months, 22/26 patients no longer require antiarrhythmic drug therapy. RESULTS: The mean per patient cost of RF ablation was $4067 in the study group. This reduces to $2546 if prior EP study and GA are excluded. The mean per patient cost of continued medical therapy was $700 per year. Extrapolating over 20 years and allowing for an annual 5% inflation factor, RF ablation becomes cost saving in 5.5 years (3.8 years if prior EP and GA are excluded). Over 20 years, continued drug therapy would be four to five times more expensive than RF ablation in the patient study group. We consider RF ablation to be a cost-effective alternative to long term drug therapy in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Victoria
16.
Aust N Z J Med ; 26(2): 206-9, 1996 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8744619

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: It is well established that radiofrequency (RF) ablation is the most cost effective treatment strategy for patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Previous cost estimates assumed at least an overnight stay following RF ablation. Day stay RF ablation however appears to be a safe alternative. AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare day stay and inpatient catheter ablation in terms of cost, efficacy and safety. METHODS: This was a retrospective cost effectiveness analysis. The study population consisted of 25 consecutive patients who underwent day stay RF ablation and 25 consecutive patients who underwent inpatient RF ablation (historical controls). Economic analysis was based upon a detailed clinical costing. RESULTS: The mean overall cost per patient of inpatient RF ablation in 1994 Australian dollar values is $2354 (SD, $642) compared with $1876 (SD, $595) for day stay RF ablation (p < 0.01). Day stay RF ablation is a cost effective alternative to inpatient RF ablation.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Ablación por Catéter/economía , Hospitalización/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Aust N Z J Med ; 24(2): 161-7, 1994 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8042944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Treatment alternatives for patients with incapacitating supraventricular arrhythmias related to an accessory atrioventricular pathway include transcatheter radiofrequency (RF) ablation, surgical division and long-term antiarrhythmic therapy (medical). AIM: The aim of this study was to compare in terms of cost and efficacy, transcatheter, surgical and medical treatment of patients with incapacitating supraventricular arrhythmias resulting from an accessory pathway. METHODS: The study population consisted of 52 patients who underwent transcatheter RF ablation (20 consecutive patients), surgical treatment (20) and medical treatment (12). Two types of economic analysis were used. In all groups, a resource based costing method was used and in the medical and surgical treatment groups, a diagnostic related group (DRG) based costing method was used. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 20 (90%) patients who underwent catheter ablation remained asymptomatic during 8.4 +/- 1.6 months of follow-up. All surgically treated patients remained asymptomatic during 54 +/- 15 months of follow-up. Only one of the 12 patients in the medical treatment group remained completely free of symptoms during the mean 58 +/- 23 month follow-up period. The mean cost (1992 Australian dollars) per patient, calculated on the basis of actual resources used (with a DRG based costing given in brackets), was $2746 +/- $800 for catheter ablation, $12141 +/- $4465 ($12880 +/- $3998) for surgical treatment and $1713 +/- $748 ($1967 +/- $33) for medical treatment. The total cost of management over 20 years is estimated to be: $2911 for catheter ablation, $17467 for surgery and $4959 for medical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the long term transcatheter RF ablation is the most cost-effective treatment strategy for patients with incapacitating supraventricular arrhythmias related to an accessory pathway.


Asunto(s)
Nodo Atrioventricular/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/economía , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/economía , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Nodo Atrioventricular/anomalías , Niño , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Electrofisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Taquicardia Supraventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Br Heart J ; 69(3): 272-5, 1993 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8461232

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the financial implications of antitachycardia pacing in patients with frequent supraventricular tachycardia. PATIENTS: Intertach pacemakers were implanted in 25 patients (mean age 47 years, five men): 22 had atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. The patients had failed a mean of 4.9 (range zero to eight) drugs and had been admitted to hospital 3.7 (zero to 31) times over a symptomatic period of 13.9 years (two months to 54 years). RESULTS: The mean admission time for implantation was 2.8 (two to seven) days. One patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome subsequently underwent surgery. Infection occurred in two patients, and pain over the pacemaker required its resiting in two. Two patients have had one admission each for tachycardia. Six patients remain on anti-arrhythmic drugs. Costs were calculated including value added tax, capital charges, and allocated overheads. The cost a year before pacing was 1174 pounds including drug costs, clinic visits, and hospital admissions. The mean cost of pacemaker implantation was 3364.22 pounds, including the pacemaker and lead, admission and procedure, readmissions and first pacing check. Subsequent annual follow up cost was 73.72 pounds including annual clinic visits and drug costs. The cost of pacing is 4241 pounds whereas medical management costs 7044 pounds assuming pacemaker life of six years: with a 10 year life the cost is 4537 pounds compared with 11,740 pounds: with a 12 year life the cost is 4685 pounds compared with 14,088 pounds. CONCLUSION: The excess cost of implantation of an antitachycardia pacemaker is minimal in patients with frequent supraventricular tachycardia despite drug treatment and is justified by excellent control of symptoms and reduction of drug use and hospital admissions.


Asunto(s)
Economía Hospitalaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Auditoría Financiera , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Marcapaso Artificial/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Ablación por Catéter/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taquicardia Supraventricular/terapia
19.
J Cardiol ; 24(6): 461-8, 1994.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7823285

RESUMEN

This study evaluated the cost of performing radiofrequency catheter ablation in Japanese patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia refractory to antiarrhythmic drug therapy in comparison with the cost of continuing pharmacologic treatment. Twenty patients (mean age 44 +/- 14 years) underwent successful ablation: 15 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and five with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. The mean duration of symptoms was 77 +/- 60 months. The patients had been treated with 2.6 +/- 1.7 antiarrhythmic drugs before undergoing ablation. Charges derived from hospital bills were compared with the outpatient charges for the year before ablation. The mean hospital stay for the ablation procedure was 4.3 +/- 0.5 days. The mean total charge for ablation was 982,806 yen +/- 103,195, and 5.7 +/- 0.7 times the outpatient charges in the previous year. The majority of radical cure charges were the costs of the electrode catheters used in the ablation procedure. All patients had a successful outcome and required no additional antiarrhythmic drug therapy. If medical treatment were continued without ablation, the mean total life-expectancy charges were estimated at 7,064,726 yen +/- 3,116,621, 41.0 +/- 19.2 times the outpatient charges. The total life charges of medical treatment were significantly more than the total ablation charges (p < 0.001). This study suggests that radiofrequency catheter ablation is of clinical benefit in treating paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and markedly reduces the cost of definitive therapy. This strategy appears to be more economical than pharmacologic treatment.


Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/economía , Ablación por Catéter/economía , Taquicardia Paroxística/cirugía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Hospitalización/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taquicardia Paroxística/tratamiento farmacológico , Taquicardia Paroxística/economía , Taquicardia Supraventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Taquicardia Supraventricular/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA