Development of a Low-Cost, High-Fidelity, Reusable Model to Simulate Clamshell Thoracotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Clamshell thoracotomy (CST) is an emergency procedure performed during traumatic cardiac arrest. Emergency physicians and surgeons are expected to perform this procedure in the Emergency Department. However, the procedure has a low occurrence rate, therefore physicians are often poorly prepared. Current teaching methods include expensive simulators and anatomically inaccurate animal models. The goal of this study was to design, produce and test, a low-cost, high-fidelity model for the teaching of CST. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The model was produced from inexpensive, commercially available materials as well as ADAMgel; a custom, recyclable, inexpensive tissue analogue. The model was tested across 19 physicians, mostly consultants and senior registrars in emergency medicine, anaesthesia and surgery. Participants completed comparative questionnaires before and after testing the model. The questionnaires were adapted from previous anaesthetic-based simulation studies and used a modified Likert scale to assess prior knowledge, anatomical realism and the teaching benefits of the model. RESULTS: Participants had varied prior knowledge and experience before testing the model. Results showed that 89.47% (n = 17) of trainees felt the model was a reasonable substitute for practice and 100% (n = 19) agreed that the model was a good training aid for inexperienced trainees and would recommend it to others. CONCLUSIONS: The model proved a successful teaching tool, improving physicians' knowledge and confidence with performing CST. This high fidelity, low cost model demonstrated that a high standard simulation teaching tool can be made which improves teaching of CST.

Emergency Department Thoracotomy: A Cost-Effective Model for Simulation Training.

BACKGROUND: Simulation provides a safe learning environment where high-stakes, low-frequency procedures can be practiced without the fear of being unsuccessful or causing harm. Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is one such procedure. Realistic thoracotomy models are expensive and not readily available. OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to describe a cost-effective, realistic, reproducible, and reusable thoracotomy model for simulation training. METHODS: We modified a commercially available clothes mannequin torso to expose the chest and abdominal cavity. A plastic skeleton composed of a spinal cord and ribs was placed inside the torso. Tubing was used to simulate the aorta and esophagus; both tubes were secured to the distal spine with zip ties. Commercially available lungs and heart were placed inside the chest cavity. A small rubber ball simulated the left lung to be able to maneuver the lung. The heart was covered with plastic wrap to simulate the pericardium. Thick tape was used to simulate the pleural cavity. Yoga mats were used to simulate the intercostal muscles, subcutaneous tissue, and skin. RESULTS: This model was tested with Emergency Medicine (EM) residents during a simulation session. A voluntary survey was available for residents to provide feedback. Survey results confirmed that the model provided valuable education, with overall positive feedback. CONCLUSION: This EDT model provides a valuable teaching opportunity to EM residents who otherwise might not have the opportunity to perform this procedure. Residents agreed that the model improved their confidence and is an effective method in providing the opportunity to practice this low-frequency, high-stakes procedure.

Simulation trainer for practicing emergent open thoracotomy procedures.

BACKGROUND: An emergent open thoracotomy (OT) is a high-risk, low-frequency procedure uniquely suited for simulation training. We developed a cost-effective Cardiothoracic (CT) Surgery trainer and assessed its potential for improving technical and interprofessional skills during an emergent simulated OT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We modified a commercially available mannequin torso with artificial tissue models to create a custom CT Surgery trainer. The trainer's feasibility for simulating emergent OT was tested using a multidisciplinary CT team in three consecutive in situ simulations. Five discretely observable milestones were identified as requisite steps in carrying out an emergent OT; namely (1) diagnosis and declaration of a code situation, (2) arrival of the code cart, (3) arrival of the thoracotomy tray, (4) initiation of the thoracotomy incision, and (5) defibrillation of a simulated heart. The time required for a team to achieve each discrete step was measured by an independent observer over the course of each OT simulation trial and compared. RESULTS: Over the course of the three OT simulation trials conducted in the coronary care unit, there was an average reduction of 29.5% (P < 0.05) in the times required to achieve the five critical milestones. The time required to complete the whole OT procedure improved by 7 min and 31 s from the initial to the final trial-an overall improvement of 40%. CONCLUSIONS: In our preliminary evaluation, the CT Surgery trainer appears to be useful for improving team performance during a simulated emergent bedside OT in the coronary care unit.

Developing a clamshell thoracotomy training model to support hybrid teaching in simulation-based education.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracotomy is an acute, time-sensitive procedure. Simulation-based education provides a safe-learning platform to learn these techniques under close supervision. METHODS: We used the spiral model and concepts of functional fidelity to guide the evolutionary design and fabrication of a hybrid thoracotomy simulator. RESULTS: This model simulates a clamshell thoracotomy that physically integrates with bespoke manikins and adds a high-fidelity technical skills element to immersive team-based simulation training. CONCLUSIONS: We describe the creation of a thoracotomy simulation model that allows trainees to practice these techniques in a safe-learning environment.

Use of Low-Cost Task Trainer for Emergency Department Thoracotomy Training in General Surgery Residency Program.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is an uncommon but potentially lifesaving procedure that warrants familiarity with anatomy, instruments, and indications necessary for completion. To address this need, we developed a low-cost EDT trainer. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a low-cost EDT trainer to teach emergency department thoracotomy with a discussion-based teaching session. Secondary objective was to study the face validity of the low-cost EDT trainer. DESIGN: A prospective 2-phase randomized control study was conducted. Participants were randomly divided into two groups. In phase one, baseline medical knowledge for both groups was assessed using a multiple-choice question pretest. In Group 1, each participant was taught EDT using a one-on-one discussion with a trauma surgeon, whereas Group 2 used the EDT trainer and debriefing for training. In phase 2 (1 month later), all participants completed a knowledge retention test and performed a videoed EDT using our EDT trainer, the video recordings were later reviewed by content experts blinded to the study participants using a checklist with a maximum score of 22. The participants also completed a reaction survey at the end of phase 2 of the study. SETTING: OhioHealth Riverside Methodist Hospital, an urban tertiary care academic hospital in Columbus, Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: Nine senior surgery residents from training years 3 to 5. RESULTS: The mean score for the performance of the procedure for the simulation-based (Group 2) was significantly higher than that of the discussion-based (Group 1) (Rater 1: 21.2 ± 0.8 vs. 19.0 ± 2.0, p = 0.05, Rater 2: 20.4 ± 1.5 vs. 18.3±1.0, p = 0.04). Group 2 also was quicker than Group 1 in deciding to start the procedure by approximately 56 seconds. When comparing the mean pretest knowledge score to the mean knowledge retention score 30 days after training, the discussion-based group improved from 58.33% to 81.25% (p = 0.01); the simulation-trained group's scores remained at 68.33%. All the participants agreed or strongly agreed that the simulator provided a realistic opportunity to perform EDT and improved their confidence. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study support our hypothesis that using a low-cost EDT trainer effectively improves general surgery residents' confidence and procedural skills scores in a simulated environment. Further training with low-cost simulators may provide surgical residents with deliberate practice opportunities and improve performance when learning low-frequency procedures.

Comparison of costs for video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: To promote the broad use of video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lobectomy (VATSL) in the management of lung cancer, it should be proved cost-effective, especially in the current cost-sensitive climate. This study evaluated and compared the costs of VATSL and open lobectomy (OL) and analyzed how the surgeon's experience level with VATSL affected the cost. METHODS: In this study, 86 patients in a VATSL group and 97 patients in an OL group underwent surgery for lung cancer. Cost comparisons were performed for the VATSL and OL groups between patients who had no complications and patients with and without complications according to tumor location and the learning period of the surgeon. RESULTS: Postoperative complications occurred for 56 patients (30.6%) (14 VATSL vs 42 OL patients; p < 0.05). Patients who underwent VATSL had significant reductions in both chest tube duration (5.4 vs 9.1 days; p = 0.000) and length of hospital stay (7.1 vs 12.0 days; p = 0.000). The mean operation time for VATSL was not significantly longer than for OL (145.8 vs 136.4 min; p = 0.782). The total hospital cost (i.e., that paid by the patient and national insurance combined) was lower for VATSL than for OL according to comparisons both among all patients ($5,391 vs $5,593, respectively) and among only noncomplicated patients ($4,684 vs $4,769, respectively). In terms of tumor location, the total hospital cost for the VATSL group was lower than for the OL group when the surgery was performed on the right lower lobe (RLL), left upper lobe (LUL), and left lower lobe (LLL). The costs were not significantly different between the two learning periods of the surgeons, except for the cost of anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: In Korea, VATSL for lung cancer had lower complication rates, shorter hospital stays, and lower total hospital costs than OL.

Creation and Implementation of a Mastery Learning Curriculum for Emergency Department Thoracotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) is a lifesaving procedure within the scope of practice of emergency physicians. Because EDT is infrequently performed, emergency medicine (EM) residents lack opportunities to develop procedural competency. There is no current mastery learning curriculum for residents to learn EDT. The purpose of this study was to develop and implement a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum to teach and assess EM residents' performance of the EDT. METHODS: We developed an EDT curriculum using a mastery learning framework. The minimum passing standard (MPS) for a previously developed 22-item checklist was determined using the Mastery Angoff approach. EM residents at a four-year academic EM residency program underwent baseline testing in performing an EDT on a simulation trainer. Performance was scored by two raters using the checklist. Learners then participated in a novel mastery learning EDT curriculum that included an educational video, hands-on instruction, and deliberate practice. After a three-month period, residents then completed initial post testing. Residents who did not meet the minimum passing standard after post testing participated in additional deliberate practice until mastery was obtained. Baseline and post-test scores, and time to completion of the procedure were compared with paired t-tests. RESULTS: Of 56 eligible EM residents, 54 completed baseline testing. Fifty-two residents completed post-testing until mastery was reached. The minimum passing standard was 91.1%, (21/22 items correct on the checklist). No participants met the MPS at the baseline assessment. After completion of the curriculum, all residents subsequently reached the MPS, with deliberate practice sessions not exceeding 40 minutes. Scores from baseline testing to post-testing significantly improved across all postgraduate years from a mean score of 10.2/22 to 21.4/22 (p <0.001). Mean time to complete the procedure improved from baseline testing (6 minutes [min] and 21 seconds [sec], interquartile range [IQR] = 4 min 54 sec - 7 min 51 sec) to post-testing (5 min 19 seconds, interquartile range 4 min 17sec - 6 min 15 sec; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This simulation-based mastery learning curriculum resulted in all residents performing an EDT at a level that met or exceeded the MPS with an overall decrease in time needed to perform the procedure.

Learning curve in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is becoming a gold standard and provides many advantages for patients. A learning curve is required for a surgeon to become proficient, and the exact number to overcome this curve is controversial. Our study aimed to define this number for mitral valve surgery in general, for replacement and repair separately. METHODS: A total of 204 mitral valve surgeries were performed via the right minithoracotomy approach from October 2014 to January 2019 by a single surgeon who isexperienced in conventional mitral valve surgery. Learning curves were analysed based on the trend of important variables (cross-clamp time, CPB time, ventilation time, ICU time, composite technical failure) over time, and the number of operations required was calculated by CUSUM method. RESULTS: MIMVS provided an excellent outcome in the carefully selected patients, with low mortality of 0.5% and low rate of complications. The decreasing trend of the important variables were observed over the years and as the cumulative number of procedures increased. The number of operations required to overcome the learning curve was 75 to 100 cases. When considered separately, the quantity for mitral valve replacement was 60 cases, whereas valve repair necessitated at least 90 cases to have an acceptable technical complication rate. CONCLUSION: MIMVS is an excellent choice for mitral valve surgery. However, this approach required a long learning curve for a surgeon who is experienced in conventional mitral valve surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The research was registered and approved by the ethical board of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, number 141/DHYD-HDDD, on April 11th 2018.

High-Fidelity Emergency Department Thoracotomy Simulator With Beating-Heart Technology and OSATS Tool Improves Trainee Confidence and Distinguishes Level of Skill.

OBJECTIVE: Resuscitative Thoracotomy or Emergency Department Thoracotomy (EDT) is a time-sensitive and potentially life-saving procedure. Yet, trainee experience with this procedure is often limited in both clinical and simulation settings. We sought to develop a high-fidelity EDT simulation module and assessment tool to facilitate trainee education. DESIGN: Using the Kern model for curricular development, a group of expert trauma surgeons identified EDT as a high-stakes, low-frequency procedure. Task analysis identified 5 key steps of EDT: (1) opening chest/rib spreader utilization; (2) pericardiotomy/cardiac repair; (3) open cardiac massage; (4) clamping aorta; and (5) control of pulmonary hilum. A high-fidelity simulator with beating-heart technology was built. The previously validated Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) was adapted to create the "EDT-OSATS" which assessed performance along several domains: (1) Surgical technique (key steps); (2) general skills; and (3) global rating. A pilot test was performed to compare board-certified trauma surgeons (i.e., Experts) with categorical general surgery interns (i.e., Novices). Each subject received preparatory materials, completed a presimulation quiz, performed a videotaped procedure on the EDT simulator, and completed a postmodule survey. Two independent raters scored performances using the EDT-OSATS. Groups were compared in descriptive and unadjusted analyses. We hypothesized that our EDT simulation module would distinguish between expert vs novice performance and improve trainee confidence. SETTING: Simulation laboratory at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, MA. PARTICIPANTS: Trauma surgeons (Experts, n = 6) and categorical general surgery interns (Novices, n = 8). RESULTS: Experts scored significantly higher than Novices on nearly all components of the EDT-OSATS, including: (1) surgical technique: pericardiotomy (4.2 vs 3.4, p = 0.040), cardiac massage (3.6 vs 2.4, p = 0.028), clamping aorta (4.1 vs 3.3, p = 0.035), control of pulmonary hilum (4.8 vs 3.4, p < 0.001); (2) general skills: time/motion (4.1 vs 2.9, p = 0.011), knowledge and handling of instruments (4.3 vs 3.1, p = 0.004), and (3) global rating (3.9 vs 2.9, p = 0.026). There was no statistical difference between groups on opening chest/rib spreader utilization (3.8 vs 3.3, p = 0.352) or procedure time (204sec vs 227sec, p = 0.401), though Experts scored numerically higher than Novices on every measure. Novices reported significantly increased confidence after the simulation (3.1 vs 1.4, p = 0.001). Ninety-three percent (13/14) of participants found the simulator realistic. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel high-fidelity beating-heart EDT simulator is realistic and improves trainee confidence in this low-frequency, high-stakes emergency procedure. The EDT-OSATS tool differentiates between performances of experienced surgeons vs novice trainees on the beating-heart simulator. This training module and accompanying assessment instrument hold promise as a learning tool for clinicians who may perform emergency department thoracotomy.

Learning curve of totally thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy.

Totally thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy (TTPS) is a feasible and safe technique that requires advanced thoracoscopic skills and knowledge of pulmonary anatomy. However, data describing the learning curve of TTPS have yet to be obtained. In this study, 128 patients who underwent TTPS between September 2010 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the learning curve and were divided chronologically into three phases, namely, ascending phase (A), plateau phase (B), and descending phase (C), through cumulative summation (CUSUM) for operative time (OT). Phases A, B, and C comprised 39, 33, and 56 cases, respectively. OT and blood loss decreased significantly from phases A to C (P < 0.01), and the frequency of intraoperative bronchoscopy for target bronchus identification decreased gradually (A, 8/39; B, 4/33; C, 3/56; P = 0.06). No significant differences were observed in demographic factors, conversion, complications, hospital stay, and retrieved lymph nodes among the three phases. Surgical outcomes and techniques improved with experience and volume. CUSUMOT indicated that the learning curve of TTPS should be more than 72 cases.

[Remarks of 52 physicians participating into 8th Ankara Emergency Rooms (ERs) Meeting 2005 on resuscitative thoracotomy intervention]. / 2005 yili 8. Ankara Aciller Toplantisi'na katilan 52 hekimin resüsitatif torakotomi girisimi ile ilgili görüsleri.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to define the opinions of 52 emergency physicians working in different ERs in Ankara and participated in the 8th Ankara Emergency Meeting 2005, on resuscitative thoracotomy (RT). METHODS: A questionnaire form containing 14 questions was designed for the opinions of physicians on RT. Responders filled in the forms through answering the questions by themselves. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test and ANOVA. RESULTS: The survey concluded three common points: 1. Resuscitative thoracotomy should be performed in the emergency rooms (65,4%), 2. It should be performed by specialists however; it is a procedure which can and should be conducted by every experienced emergency physician easily when the indications are clear (69,23%). 3. Majority of the responders stated that they would like to get a post-education course on this subject (96,15%). CONCLUSION: Theoretical and practical policies of our medical education on RT should be revised. Emergency rooms should be equipped for this intervention. Resuscitative thoracotomy should be applied by the experienced people, indications should be clarified well and emergency physicians should be trained on resuscitative thoracotomy by regular post-graduation courses.

Chest drainage teaching and training for medical students. Use of a surgical ex vivo pig model.

PURPOSE: Implement a constructivist approach in thoracic drainage training in surgical ex vivo pig models, to compare the acquisition of homogeneous surgical skills between medical students. METHODS: Experimental study, prospective, transversal, analytical, controlled, three steps. Selection, training, evaluation. INCLUSION CRITERIA: a) students without training in thoracic drainage; b) without exposure to constructivist methodology. 2) EXCLUSION CRITERIA: a) students developed surgical skills; b) a history of allergy. (N = 312). Two groups participated in the study: A and B. Lecture equal for both groups. Differentiated teaching: group A, descriptive and informative method; group B, learning method based on problems. A surgical ex vivo pig model for training the chest drain was created. Were applied pre and post-test, test goal-discursive and OSATS scale. RESULTS: Theoretical averages: Group A = 9.5 ± 0.5; Group B = 8.8 ± 1.1 (p = 0.006). Medium Practices: Group A = 22.8 ± 1.8; Group B = 23.0 ± 2.8 (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: Through the constructivist methodology implemented in the thoracic drainage training in surgical ex vivo pig models, has proven the acquisition of surgical skills homogeneous compared among medical students.

Clamshell thoracotomy and open heart massage--A potential life-saving procedure can be taught to emergency physicians: An educational cadaveric pilot study.

AIMS: Selected patients in traumatic cardiac arrest may benefit from pre-hospital thoracotomy. Pre-hospital care physicians rarely have surgical training and the procedure is rarely performed in most European systems. Limited data exists to inform teaching and training for this procedure. We set out to run a pilot study to determine the time required to perform a thoracotomy and the a priori defined complication rate. METHODS: We adapted an existing system operating procedure requiring four instruments (Plaster-of-Paris shears, dressing scissors, non-toothed forceps, scalpel) for this study. We identified a convenience sample of surgically trained and non-surgically trained participants. All received a training package including a lecture, practical demonstration and cadaver experience. Time to perform the procedure, anatomical accuracy and a priori complication rates were assessed. RESULTS: The mean total time for the clamshell thoracotomy from thoracic incision to delivery of the heart was 167 s (02:47 min:sec). There was no statistical difference in the time to complete the procedure or complication rate among surgeons, non-surgeons and students. The complication rate dropped from 36% in the first attempt to 7% in the second attempt but this was not statistically significant. This is a pilot study and small numbers of participants arguably saw it underpowered to define differences between study groups. CONCLUSION: Clamshell thoracotomy can be taught using cadaver models. In this simulated environment, the procedure may be performed rapidly with minimum equipment.

Current era minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: techniques and practice.

BACKGROUND: Since the first aortic valve replacement through a right thoracotomy was reported in 1993, upper hemisternotomy and right anterior thoracotomy have become the predominant approaches for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Clinical studies have documented equivalent operative mortality, less bleeding, and reduced intensive care/hospital stay compared with conventional sternotomy despite longer procedure times. However, comparative trials face challenges due to patient preference, surgeon bias, and the lack of a standardized minimally invasive surgical approach. METHODS: Twenty cardiothoracic surgeons from 19 institutions across the United States, with a combined experience of nearly 5000 minimally invasive aortic valve replacement operations, formed a working group to develop a basis for a standardized approach to patient evaluation, operative technique, and postoperative care. In addition, a stepwise learning program for surgeons was outlined. RESULTS: Improved cosmesis, less pain and narcotic use, and faster recovery have been reported and generally accepted by patients and by surgeons performing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. These benefits are more likely to be verified with standardization of the procedure itself, which will greatly facilitate the design and implementation of future clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons interested in learning and performing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement must have expertise in conventional aortic valve replacement at centers with adequate case volumes. A team approach that coordinates efforts of the surgeon, anesthesiologist, perfusionist, and nurses is required to achieve the best clinical outcomes. By first developing fundamental minimally invasive skills using specialized cannulation techniques, neck lines, and long-shafted instruments in the setting of conventional full sternotomy, the safest operative environment is afforded to patients.

Knowledge and usability of a trauma training system for general surgery residents.

BACKGROUND: Resident work-hour restrictions challenge educators to supplement residents' surgical education. We evaluated a computer-based trauma surgery system's ability to increase residents' surgical knowledge. METHODS: Modules on thoracic and abdominal surgical approaches were evaluated. Surgical residents with 1 or more years of experience completed the pretest, an interactive module, the post-test, and a usability survey. RESULTS: Fifteen participants completed both modules. Thoracic module pretest and post-test scores were 56 ± 11 (mean ± standard deviation) and 90 ± 10, respectively (P < .0001). Mean abdominal module scores were 48 ± 20 and 85 ± 14, respectively (P < .0001). The usability survey showed that 87% of participants would use these modules to supplement their trauma training, 93% could easily distinguish anatomic detail, and 100% thought that procedures were shown clearly. CONCLUSIONS: This novel computer-based trauma education training system improved residents' knowledge of anatomy, surgical incisions, exposures, and technique. As innovative didactic tools arise in postgraduate medical education, it is crucial to document their effects on educational processes, learning satisfaction, and knowledge outcomes.

Traversing the learning curve in minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon's experience with a right minithoracotomy approach for aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis, first developed to assess industrial quality control, was then used to monitor cardiac surgery performance more than 10 years ago. This analysis may be more sensitive than the standard statistical tools to analyse surgical results. The aim of this study is to assess a single surgeon's learning curve with right anterior minithoracotomy (RAMT) for aortic valve replacement (AVR) using risk-adjusted CUSUM curves and to compare the short- and medium-term results of these patients with a propensity-matched cohort of patients who had standard AVR (SAVR). METHODS: The first 100 patients who underwent RAMT by a single surgeon were analysed, using risk-adjusted CUSUM curves. Predicted risks of failure for individual patients were derived from our institutional database, using logistic regression modelling. Perioperative death or one or more of 10 adverse events constituted failure. Finally, RAMT patients were matched to 100 SAVR patients operated by the same surgeon in the same period, using a propensity score analysis. RESULTS: The author's RAMT experience was associated with a low risk of cumulative failures from the outset, and no learning curve effect was observed. A cluster of surgical failure was individuated at the end of the CUSUM curve (between patients 90 and 100). The predicted risk of failure for the study population constantly increased over the time. After propensity score matching, no baseline differences were observed between RAMT and SAVR patients. The mortality rate was similar between groups (P = 0.8). However, the RAMT group had a lower need for mechanical-assisted ventilation (P = 0.02), transfusion requirements (P = 0.001), post-operative atrial fibrillation (P = 0.01) and post-operative intensive care unit and hospital stay (P = 0.001). Three-year survival was similar between groups (RAMT 94.5% vs. SAVR 92.8%). CONCLUSIONS: AVR can be safely performed through an RAMT with results comparable with the standard sternotomy technique. Patients undergoing this technique are not exposed to an increased operative risk also during the surgeon's initial experience. CUSUM analysis is a valuable tool to assess the learning curve of new surgical techniques and to implement continuous performance monitoring.

Subspecialization may improve an esophageal atresia service but has not addressed declining trainee experience.

BACKGROUND: Subspecialization defined pediatric surgery using Alder Hey innovations in neonatal surgical units (Rickham) and anesthesia (Jackson-Rees). In neonatal surgery, United Kingdom subspecialization for cloacal extrophy and biliary atresia acknowledges their dependence on multidisciplinary management and the desirability of caseload for training. We phased in regional subspecialization for esophageal atresia (EA) repair and replacement surgery while trainee numbers increased nationally to reduce hours. We examined EA outcomes and training during subspecialization. METHODS: We analyzed EA cases (1999-2009) treated at Alder Hey Children's Hospital in two 5-year cohorts, the first early phase of incomplete subspecialization and the later near-total or "comprehensive" subspecialization phase. These periods approximated those before and after trainee numbers rose sharply to reduce working hours. RESULTS: Of 119 cases, 60 in the early cohort shared similar characteristics with the 59 in the later cohort. Near-complete subspecialization was achieved in the second 5 years with 97% of cases performed under a surgeon with an EA specialty interest; in the earlier cohort, 25% of surgeries were undertaken by surgeons without EA subspecialty interest. With near-complete subspecialization, pediatric intensive care unit stay fell from 5 (4-11) to 4 (2-7) days (median (IQR); P = .005), and approaches such as the Bianchi axillary repair and Bax single-stage jejunal interposition were introduced; hospital stay went from 25 (12-63) to 17 (13-28) days (P = .27), and deaths, from 6 to 3 children (P = .49). Mortality was 7.6% (9/119) compared with 14% (19/134) in our previous institutional series (χ(2) = 2.8, P = .09), and neonatal mortality fell from 6% to 0 (P = .008). Near doubling of trainee numbers accompanied an approximately 3-fold fall in repairs per trainee over the study. CONCLUSION: Near-complete subspecialization for EA coincided with reduced pediatric intensive care unit stay, successful introduction of cosmetic axillary approaches, and extension of our replacement service to offer all interposition types. It has not reversed the steep decline in trainee experience of EA that has been associated with the greater numbers of trainees that have been employed to reduce working hours.

Factors affecting selection of operative approach and subsequent short-term outcomes after anatomic resection for lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies evaluating video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer are single-institution series, suffer from small sample size, or use administrative or self-reported databases. Using a multi-institutional, standardized, and audited surgical outcomes database, our objectives were to examine preoperative factors associated with undergoing VATS vs open resection and assess subsequent perioperative outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use File was used to identify patients who underwent anatomic resection (eg, segmentectomy, lobectomy, and bi-lobectomy) for primary lung cancer (2005 to 2010). Multiple logistic regression models, including propensity scores, were developed to assess preoperative factors associated with undergoing VATS and the risk-adjusted association between operative approach and 30-day outcomes. RESULTS: Of 2,353 patients undergoing resection, 74% underwent open thoracotomy (OT) and 26% underwent VATS. After regression for confounders, factors associated with undergoing a VATS were patient age older than 75 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.05-1.90), Hispanic ethnicity (OR = 2.52; 95% CI, 1.69-3.77), and cardiothoracic surgery training (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.37-2.07). Patients undergoing OT had a higher likelihood of any adverse event developing (24% vs 14%; OR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.35-2.29), specifically pneumonia and sepsis/septic shock. Median length of stay was significantly longer in the OT group (7 vs 4 days; p < 0.001). Mortality was not significantly different for VATS vs OT after regression for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to patient factors, surgeon training can play a role in determining the operative approach offered to patients. Patients selected for VATS had a lower 30-day morbidity and shorter length of stay compared with OT anatomic resection for primary lung cancer.