Waitlist and post-transplant outcomes for eisenmenger syndrome: A comparison of transplant strategies.

BACKGROUND: End-stage Eisenmenger syndrome (ES) due to unrepaired atrial septal defect (ASD) or ventricular septal defect (VSD) is an indication for lung transplantation (LTx) or heart-lung transplantation (HLTx). Limited evidence exists as to the optimal transplant strategy for this unique population. AIM: To describe waitlist characteristics and post-transplant outcomes in patients with ES-ASD or ES-VSD. METHODS: Using the ISHLT Registry, data were extracted for all ES-ASD or ES-VSD patients who underwent transplantation between 1987 and 2018. Additional data were sought for patients listed for LTx or HLTx in the OPTN Registry during the same period. Early era was defined as 1987-2004, and current era was defined as 2005-2018. RESULTS: In the current era, patients with ES-ASD or ES-VSD represented a lessening proportion of all LTx and HLTx. Compared to LTx for other indications, the odds of transplantation were significantly less for both ES-ASD 0.18 [0.07-0.50] and ES-VSD 0.03 [0.004-0.22]. In the early era, an equivalent survival was observed for ES-ASD who underwent HLTx versus LTx (p = 0.47), and superior survival for ES-VSD (p = 0.015). In contrast, ES-ASD patients who underwent LTx from the current era displayed better survival compared with HLTx, 10-year survival 52% vs 30% p = 0.036. Similar survival were observed for ES-VSD for both transplant strategies (p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: LTx shows superior survival outcomes in the current era for ES ASD patients, and equivalent outcomes for ES-VSD. In the current era, ES-ASD or ES-VSD patients were less likely to be transplanted than other candidates for LTx.

Brief Overview of Lung, Heart, and Heart-Lung Transplantation.

Lung transplantation, heart transplantation, and heart-lung transplantation are life-saving treatment options for patients with lung and/or cardiac failure. Evolution in these therapies over the past several decades has led to better outcomes with application to more patients. The complexity and severity of illness of patients in the pretransplant phase has steadily increased, making posttransplant intensive care unit management more difficult. Despite these factors and the pervasive complications of immunosuppressive therapy, outcomes continue to improve.

[Selection of lung transplant candidates in France in 2019]. / Sélection des candidats à la transplantation pulmonaire en France en 2019.

INTRODUCTION: In 2015, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) published a consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates. In the absence of recent French recommendations, this guideline is useful in order to send lung transplant candidates to the transplantation centers and to list them for lung transplantation at the right time. BACKGROUND: The main indications for lung transplantation in adults are COPD and emphysema, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and interstitial diseases, cystic fibrosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The specific indications for each underlying disease as well as the general contraindications have been reviewed in 2015 by the ISHLT. For cystic fibrosis, the main factors are forced expiratory volume in one second, 6-MWD, PAH and clinical deterioration characterized by increased frequency of exacerbations; for emphysema progressive disease, the BODE score, hypercapnia and FEV1; for PAH progressive disease or the need of specific intravenous therapy and NYHA classification. Finally, the diagnosis of fibrosing interstitial lung disease is usually a sufficient indication for lung transplantation assessment. OUTLOOK AND CONCLUSION: These new recommendations, close to French practices, help clinicians to find the right time for referral of patients to transplantation centers. This is crucial for the prognosis of lung transplantation.

An economic analysis of heart-lung transplantation. Costs, insurance coverage, and reimbursement.

Rarely has the cost of heart-lung transplantation received attention. Although the procedure is still largely regarded as experimental, this does not diminish the significance of costs. The National Cooperative Transplantation Study was undertaken to better understand the costs of all transplants, including heart-lung transplantation. Data on transplantation charges from date of procedure to discharge were obtained from more than 65% of all heart-lung transplantation programs active in 1988. These programs accounted for 61% of all transplantations performed in 1988. Valid sample survey data (no more than 25 procedures per center) were obtained for 42 patients, or approximately 58% of all procedures done in the United States. Detailed data were also collected on sources of payment and amount reimbursed. Because of outlier data, we report statistical medians, rather than means, as our measure of central tendency. The median charge for heart-lung transplantation was $134,881, with an average hospital stay of 31 days. Total charges fell between $99,535 and $216,639 for 50% of the cases studied. Half of the patients spent between 23 and 49 days in the hospital. Because of the small number of cases available for analysis, it was not meaningful to cross-classify the data according to various prognostic variables. More than 78% of the procedures studied were paid for by private insurers. Reimbursement exceeded 90% of billed charges for 84.6% of the cases analyzed. Despite the experimental status of heart-lung transplantation, insurance reimbursement has been favorable for those heart-lung transplantations that insurers have covered. Nevertheless, the future of heart-lung transplantation is unclear. The availability of donors remains a serious constraint, as is seen in the decrease of procedures performed annually. In fact, lung transplantation now appears to be the preferred approach to the treatment of pulmonary disease.

Liberalization of donor criteria in lung and heart-lung transplantation.

Since March 1986, we have performed 26 heart-lung transplantations, 42 single-lung transplantations, 9 bilateral single-lung transplantations, and 1 double-lung transplantation. The original lung donor requirements were as follows: age less than 40 years, no smoking history; no gram-negative rods or fungus on sputum Gram stain; arterial oxygen tension greater than 140 mm Hg on an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.40; no infiltrate or pneumothorax on the chest radiograph; and donor height within 15 cm (6 inches) of recipient height. As the number of potential recipients increased, so did the waiting time. To counter this delay, during the past year we have liberalized our donor criteria. We now accept lung donors up to age 60 years. Any kind of smoking history is acceptable unless there is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pulmonary fibrosis on the chest radiograph. Sputum must be free from fungus, but gram-negative rods are treated with appropriate antibiotics. The arterial oxygen tension on an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.40 should be greater than 100 mm Hg, and a small pulmonary infiltrate is not worrisome. This liberalization of the donor pool for lung and heart-lung transplantation has not adversely affected early outcome.

Have we met the expectations of heart and lung transplantation in children?

Heart transplantation in children has been a relatively common practice for more than 15 years, and lung transplantation, while in use as a therapeutic modality for a shorter period of time, has 10 years of follow-up data for review. Because they are expensive, time-consuming, labor-intensive procedures, it is reasonable to review what has transpired to evaluate the effectiveness of these procedures, not only from the standpoint of survival, but in the applicability and availability to all who need it, and successful long-term outcomes including quality of life in those who receive it. Health care expense can be justified by improved results that reach expectations in the areas of applicability, availability, and survival. The applicability issue has, in large part, been achieved in transplantation in children. The goal of comprehensive availability can be met by providing alternatives to transplantation, advancing artificial organ research, and overhauling the organ donor programs to improve organ retrieval. To better meet expectations for survival, further advances in transplant immunology and solutions to the problems of post-transplant coronary artery disease and bronchiolitis obliterans will have to occur.

[Practice guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Cardiac and heart-lung transplants]. / Guías de actuación clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Trasplante cardíaco y de corazón-pulmones.

Cardiac transplantation is the only therapy that is able to substantially modify the natural evolution of patients with severe heart failure, along with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Nevertheless, because of the limited number of donors, its impact is scarce compared to the magnitude of the problem. Up to the end of 1998, 48,541 orthotopic cardiac transplantations and about 2,510 heart and both lung transplantations have been registered throughout the world. In Spain 2,780 procedures have been performed in the last 15 years. The survival expectations for a transplanted patient is 75% after the first year and 60% the following 5 years. The average duration of the graft is 8 years and 6 months. Cardiac transplantation is indicated for young and middle-age patients with irreversible cardiac process in bad clinical condition, with no other possibility of medical or surgical management and with a limited life expectancy. The major debate when choosing this therapy appears with the critical patients, patients older than 65 years, and some patients with systemic diseases. The great demand of transplantation obliges the teams to enlarge the criteria for donors' acceptance. At the same time, the increase of the knowledge about the transmission of some infections, mainly viral, forces to review those criteria day-to-day. The use of different immunosuppressive strategies pursues the control of rejection. The most commonly used is the so-called triple therapy (cyclosporine-azathioprine and steroids). The use of antilymphocytic antibodies such as cytolytic induction treatment is not unanimously accepted. Some of the new immunosuppressive agents such as myphenolate-mofetil and tacrolimus seem to offer advantages mainly due to their greater potency. Since transplantation is a limited procedure, of which its practise has an effect on the whole health system of a country, a perfect planning and adequacy of the Centers is compulsory, as well as the setting-up of clear rules for the use of donors and priority of transplantation. Finally, the patient must be informed clearly and comprehensively at length of the risks, limitations and expectations of these complex procedures.

Current concepts and controversies in lung transplantation.

This article reviews the history of organ transplantation, specifically focusing on the advances leading to the first successful human lung transplant. It also provides an overview of the com-mon indications and general selection criteria for lung transplant recipients, highlights areas of current controversy in pulmonary transplantation, reviews current approaches to posttransplantation immunosuppression, and discusses common complications seen intransplant recipients.

Medicare program; criteria for Medicare coverage of lung transplants--HCFA. Notice with comment period.

This notice announces a Medicare national coverage decision for lung and heart-lung transplantations. Lung transplantation refers to the transplantation of one or both lungs from a single cadaver donor. Heart-lung transplantation refers to the transplantation of one or both lungs and the heart from a single cadaver donor. We have determined that, under certain circumstances, lung transplants and heart-lung transplants are a medically reasonable and necessary service when furnished to patients with progressive end-stage pulmonary or cardiopulmonary disease and when furnished by Medicare participating facilities that meet specific criteria, including patient selection criteria. DATES: This notice is effective February 2, 1995. For information on how this notice effects Medicare payment for lung and heart-lung transplants, see sections E and F of this notice.

EACTS guidelines for the use of patient safety checklists.

The Safety Checklist concept has been an integral part of many industries that face high-complexity tasks for many decades and in industries such as aviation and engineering checklists have evolved from their very inception. Investigations of the causes of surgical deaths around the world have repeatedly pointed to medical errors that could be prevented as an important cause of death and disability. As a result, the World Health Organisation developed and evaluated a three-stage surgical checklist in 2007 demonstrating that complications were significantly reduced, including surgical infection rates and even mortality. Together with the results from other large cohort studies into the utility of the surgical checklist, many countries have fully implemented the use of surgical checklists into routine practice. A key factor in the successful implementation of a surgical checklist is engagement of the staff implementing the checklist. In surgical specialties such as our own it was quickly seen that there were many important omissions in the generic checklist that did not cover issues particular to our specialty, and thus the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery embarked on a process to create a version of the checklist that might be more appropriate and specific to cardiothoracic surgery, including checks on preparations for excessive bleeding, perfusion arrangements and ICU preparations, for example. The guideline presented here summarizes the evidence for the surgical checklist and also goes through in detail the changes recommended for our specialty.

Potential refinements of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation primary graft dysfunction grading system.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation and The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Working Group on PGD has recently reported standardized consensus criteria, based on the recipient arterial blood-gas analysis and chest X-ray findings, to define PGD and determine its severity (grade range, 0-3). The grading system has been shown to predict post-transplant outcomes; however, further evaluation and refinement of the validity of the grading system is an important next step to enhance its utility. In this review, we describe advantage and disadvantages of the current PGD grading system based on series of analyses we have conducted and possible options for its potential refinement. The suggested revisions are (1) additional assessment time points at 6 and 12 hours should be included, (2) only bilateral infiltrates on chest X-ray (not unilateral infiltrates) should be considered as an infiltrate in bilateral lung transplants, (3) information from the chest X-ray is useful within 6 hours of final lung reperfusion (T0) but is not necessary to classify grade 3 at 12 to 72 hours, (4) apply PGD grade to single and bilateral lung transplant separately, (5) all extubated patients should be considered as grade 0 to 1, (6) note if PGD grade is being defined by specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, including extubation, with clear chest X-ray, on nitric oxide or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Although, further evaluations of the PGD definition and grading system are needed, the suggested refinements in this review may further enhance the reliability and validity of the PGD grading system as an important new lung transplant study instrument.