Drug screening of food and drug administration-approved compounds against Babesia bovis in vitro.

Babesia (B.) bovis is one of the main etiological agents of bovine babesiosis, causes serious economic losses to the cattle industry. Control of bovine babesiosis has been hindered by the limited treatment selection for B. bovis, thus, new options are urgently needed. We explored the drug library and unbiasedly screened 640 food and drug administration (FDA) approved drug compounds for their inhibitory activities against B. bovis in vitro. The initial screening identified 13 potentially effective compounds. Four potent compounds, namely mycophenolic acid (MPA), pentamidine (PTD), doxorubicin hydrochloride (DBH) and vorinostat (SAHA) exhibited the lowest IC50 and then selected for further evaluation of their in vitro efficacies using viability, combination inhibitory and cytotoxicity assays. The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of MPA, PTD, DBH, SAHA were 11.38 ± 1.66, 13.12 ± 4.29, 1.79 ± 0.15 and 45.18 ± 7.37 µM, respectively. Of note, DBH exhibited IC50 lower than that calculated for the commonly used antibabesial drug, diminazene aceturate (DA). The viability result revealed the ability of MPA, PTD, DBH, SAHA to prevent the regrowth of treated parasite at 4 × and 2 × of IC50. Antagonistic interactions against B. bovis were observed after treatment with either MPA, PTD, DBH or SAHA in combination with DA. Our findings indicate the richness of FDA approved compounds by novel potent antibabesial candidates and the identified potent compounds especially DBH might be used for the treatment of animal babesiosis caused by B. bovis.

In Vitro Assessment of the Genotoxic Hazard of Novel Hydroxamic Acid- and Benzamide-Type Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors (HDACi).

Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are already approved for the therapy of leukemias. Since they are also emerging candidate compounds for the treatment of non-malignant diseases, HDACi with a wide therapeutic window and low hazard potential are desirable. Here, we investigated a panel of 12 novel hydroxamic acid- and benzamide-type HDACi employing non-malignant V79 hamster cells as toxicology guideline-conform in vitro model. HDACi causing a ≥10-fold preferential cytotoxicity in malignant neuroblastoma over non-malignant V79 cells were selected for further genotoxic hazard analysis, including vorinostat and entinostat for control. All HDACi selected, (i.e., KSK64, TOK77, DDK137 and MPK77) were clastogenic and evoked DNA strand breaks in non-malignant V79 cells as demonstrated by micronucleus and comet assays, histone H2AX foci formation analyses (γH2AX), DNA damage response (DDR) assays as well as employing DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair-defective VC8 hamster cells. Genetic instability induced by hydroxamic acid-type HDACi seems to be independent of bulky DNA adduct formation as concluded from the analysis of nucleotide excision repair (NER) deficient mutants. Summarizing, KSK64 revealed the highest genotoxic hazard and DDR stimulating potential, while TOK77 and MPK77 showed the lowest DNA damaging capacity. Therefore, these compounds are suggested as the most promising novel candidate HDACi for subsequent pre-clinical in vivo studies.

The evaluation of the efficacy and potential genotoxic hazard of combined SAHA and 5-FU treatment in the chemoresistant colorectal cancer cell lines.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an essential chemotherapeutic drug for colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. However, the frequent development of drug resistance has dramatically affected its clinical use. Therefore, novel treatment strategies are critical to improving patient outcomes. Herein, we investigated the ability of the epigenetic drug SAHA to increase the sensitivity of chemoresistant CRC cells to 5-FU. In addition, we evaluated the potential genotoxic risk of SAHA+5-FU combination treatment. As a model system, we used three CRC cell lines, HT-29, SW480, and HT-29/EGFP/FUR, differing in their resistance to 5-FU. CRC cell lines were exposed to sub-toxic SAHA concentrations for 24 h, followed by a 48 h treatment with 5-FU. The cytotoxicity of SAHA, 5-FU, and SAHA+5-FU was measured by the MTT test, the genotoxicity by the comet assay, and the micronucleus test. The apoptotic/necrotic activity was assessed using morphological criteria. We found a synergic decrease in the viability of HT-29 and SW480 cells, but not the most resistant HT-29/EGFP/FUR cells after combined SAHA+5-FU exposure compared to 5-FU. Remarkably, SAHA most efficiently induced apoptosis in HT-29/EGFP/FUR cells compared to HT-29 and SW480 cells. Combined SAHA+5-FU treatment resulted in a synergistic increase in apoptotic/necrotic cells in HT-29 cell line, while rather additive/sub-additive effect was determined in the SW480 and HT-29/EGFP/FUR cells. At the same time, however, a synergistic rise in micronuclei was found in CRC cell lines (at least at some concentrations). We have shown that SAHA can sensitize CRC cells to 5-FU; therefore, epigenetic and convential drug combinations could be beneficial for the patients. However, the increase in micronucleus formation after combined SAHA+5-FU treatment indicates a potential health hazard. The clastogenic activity could contribute to cancer heterogeneity, favoring progeny of such aberrant cells to clonal expansion. Therefore, developing new specific epigenetic drugs or nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery might reduce the potential genotoxic risk.

Vorinostat is genotoxic and epigenotoxic in the mouse bone marrow cells at the human equivalent doses.

Vorinostat was approved as the first histone deacetylase inhibitor for the management of cutaneous T cell lymphoma. However, it's in vivo genetic and epigenetic effects on non-cancerous cells remain poorly understood. As genetic and epigenetic changes play a critical role in the pathogenesis of carcinogenesis, we investigated whether vorinostat induces genetic and epigenetic alterations in mouse bone marrow cells. Bone marrow cells were isolated 24 h following the last oral administration of vorinostat at the doses of 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg/day for five days (approximately equal to the recommended human doses). The cells were then used to assess clastogenicity and aneugenicity by the micronucleus test complemented by fluorescence in situ hybridization assay; DNA strand breaks, oxidative DNA strand breaks, and DNA methylation by the modified comet assay; apoptosis by annexin V/PI staining analysis and the occurrence of the hypodiploid DNA content; and DNA damage/repair gene expression by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Array. The expression of the mRNA transcripts were also confirmed by real-time PCR and western blot analysis. Vorinostat caused structural chromosomal damage, numerical chromosomal abnormalities, DNA strand breaks, oxidative DNA strand breaks, DNA hypomethylation, and programed cell death in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, the expression of numerous genes implicated in DNA damage/repair were altered after vorinostat treatment. Accordingly, the genetic/epigenetic mechanism(s) of action of vorinostat may play a role in its carcinogenicity and support the continued study and development of new compounds with lower toxicity.