Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts by computed tomography: comparison with conventional coronary angiography]. / Valoración no invasiva de injertos coronarios con tomografía computarizada: comparación con la angiografía convencional.
Trigo Bautista, Alberto; Estornell, Jordi; Ridocci, Francisco; Soriano, Carlos J; Gudín, Margarita; Vilar, Juan V; Federico, Pau; Payá, Rafael; Cervera, Vicente; Velasco, José A.
Afiliación
  • Trigo Bautista A; Servicio de Cardiología, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Rev Esp Cardiol ; 58(7): 807-14, 2005 Jul.
Article en Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16022812
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND

OBJECTIVES:

Although it has been demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in the non-invasive assessment of major epicardial coronary arteries is high, only a few studies have evaluated the technique's reliability in assessing coronary artery bypass grafts. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of coronary grafts. PATIENTS AND

METHOD:

We prospectively evaluated 117 coronary grafts in 38 patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery and who had a clinical indication for angiographic graft assessment. All patients were in sinus rhythm and had a heart rate below 75 bpm. A 16-detector scanner was used for non-invasive assessment of the coronary grafts at a slice thickness of 1.2 mm. The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography in the non-invasive assessment of significant lesions (i.e., occluded lesions or those with a stenosis greater than 50%) in coronary artery bypass grafts was evaluated by comparison with the results of conventional angiography.

RESULTS:

Of the 117 grafts evaluated, 99 (84.6%) were visualized by conventional angiography and 109 (93.2%) by computed tomography. Overall, 98 grafts were analyzed using both techniques. The sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography in detecting significant lesions were 92% and 97.3%, respectively, for all grafts; 89.5% and 97.6%, respectively, for venous grafts; and 100% and 96.8%, respectively, for arterial grafts.

CONCLUSIONS:

The diagnostic accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in coronary artery bypass graft assessment was high.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Puente de Arteria Coronaria / Angiografía Coronaria Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: Es Revista: Rev Esp Cardiol Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España
Buscar en Google
Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Puente de Arteria Coronaria / Angiografía Coronaria Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: Es Revista: Rev Esp Cardiol Año: 2005 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España