Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing the programation of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.
Vidal, Bàrbara; Sitges, Marta; Marigliano, Alba; Delgado, Victoria; Díaz-Infante, Ernesto; Azqueta, Manel; Tamborero, David; Tolosana, José María; Berruezo, Antonio; Pérez-Villa, Félix; Paré, Carles; Mont, Lluís; Brugada, Josep.
Afiliación
  • Vidal B; Thorax Clinic Institute, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Am J Cardiol ; 100(6): 1002-6, 2007 Sep 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17826387
This study was conducted to investigate the clinical impact of cardiac resynchronization device optimization. A series of 100 consecutive patients received cardiac resynchronization therapy. In the first 49 patients, an empirical atrioventricular delay of 120 ms was set, with simultaneous biventricular stimulation (interventricular [VV] interval=0 ms). In the next 51 patients, systematic atrioventricular optimization was performed. VV optimization was also performed, selecting 1 VV delay: right or left ventricular preactivation (+30 or -30 ms) or simultaneous (VV interval=0 ms), according to the best synchrony obtained by tissue Doppler-derived wall displacement. At follow-up, patients who were alive without cardiac transplantation and showed improvement of >or=10% in the distance walked in the 6-minute walking test were considered responders. There were no differences between the 2 groups at baseline. Left ventricular ejection fraction improved in the 2 groups, but left ventricular cardiac output improved only in the optimized group. At 6 months, patients with optimized devices walked slightly further in the 6-minute walking test (497+/-167 vs 393+/-123 m, p<0.01), with no differences in New York Heart Association functional class or quality of life compared with nonoptimized patients. Overall, the number of nonresponders were similar in the 2 groups (27% vs 23%, p=NS). In conclusion, the echocardiographic optimization of cardiac resynchronization devices provided a slight incremental clinical benefit at midterm follow-up. Simple and rapid methods to routinely optimize the devices are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Buscar en Google
Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Bloqueo de Rama / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España
Buscar en Google
Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Marcapaso Artificial / Bloqueo de Rama / Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial / Insuficiencia Cardíaca Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Cardiol Año: 2007 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España