Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Selected medical errors in the intensive care unit: results of the IATROREF study: parts I and II.
Garrouste-Orgeas, Maité; Timsit, Jean François; Vesin, Aurelien; Schwebel, Carole; Arnodo, Patrick; Lefrant, Jean Yves; Souweine, Bertrand; Tabah, Alexis; Charpentier, Julien; Gontier, Olivier; Fieux, Fabienne; Mourvillier, Bruno; Troché, Gilles; Reignier, Jean; Dumay, Marie Françoise; Azoulay, Elie; Reignier, Bernard; Carlet, Jean; Soufir, Lilia.
Afiliación
  • Garrouste-Orgeas M; Service de Réanimation Médico-Chirurgicale, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph, 185 rue Raymond Losserand, 75014 Paris, France. mgarrouste@outcomerea.org
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 181(2): 134-42, 2010 Jan 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19875690
RATIONALE: Although intensive care units (ICUs) were created for patients with life-threatening illnesses, the ICU environment generates a high risk of iatrogenic events. Identifying medical errors (MEs) that serve as indicators for iatrogenic risk is crucial for purposes of reporting and prevention. OBJECTIVES: We describe the selection of indicator MEs, the incidence of such MEs, and their relationship with mortality. METHODS: We selected indicator MEs using Delphi techniques. An observational prospective multicenter cohort study of these MEs was conducted from March 27 to April 3, 2006, in 70 ICUs; 16 (23%) centers were audited. Harm from MEs was collected using specific scales. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen types of MEs were selected as indicators; 1,192 MEs were reported for 1,369 patients, and 367 (26.8%) patients experienced at least 1 ME (2.1/1,000 patient-days). The most common MEs were insulin administration errors (185.9/1,000 d of insulin treatment). Of the 1,192 medical errors, 183 (15.4%) in 128 (9.3%) patients were adverse events that were followed by one or more clinical consequences (n = 163) or that required one or more procedures or treatments (n = 58). By multivariable analysis, having two or more adverse events was an independent risk factor for ICU mortality (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-7.36; P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of medical errors on mortality indicates an urgent need to develop prevention programs. We have planned a study to assess a program based on our results.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Errores Médicos / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Errores Médicos / Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Asunto de la revista: TERAPIA INTENSIVA Año: 2010 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia