Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for patients with 1-4 radioresistant brain metastases.
Lo, Simon S; Clarke, James W; Grecula, John C; McGregor, John M; Mayr, Nina A; Cavaliere, Robert; Kendra, Kari L; Gupta, Nilendu; Wang, Jian Z; Sarkar, Atom; Olencki, Thomas E.
Afiliación
  • Lo SS; Department of Radiation Oncology, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital, Ohio State University Medical Center, 300 West 10th Avenue, Ste 088A, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Simon.Lo@osumc.edu
Med Oncol ; 28 Suppl 1: S439-44, 2011 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20814764
Brain metastases from radioresistant histologies are perceived to be less responsive to WBRT compared to other histologies, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may provide better local control. The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of patients with 1-4 brain metastasis from radioresistant histologies (renal cell carcinoma and melanoma) treated with SRS alone. Thirty-eight patients with 1-4 radioresistant brain metastases (66 lesions) were treated with SRS alone. The median age was 55 years. Fourteen and 24 patients had renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and melanoma brain metastases, respectively. Distribution of number of lesions was as follows: one lesion, 22 patients; 2 lesions, 8 patients; 3 lesions, 5 patients; and 4 lesions, 3 patients. Distribution of RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classes was as follows: II, 37 patients and III, 1 patient. The median marginal dose was 20 Gy. The median follow-up was 6.1 months. The 3-, 6-, 9-, 12-, and 18-month local control (LC) rates were 87.9, 81.4, 67.9, 67.9, and 60.3%, respectively. The corresponding free-from-distant-brain failure (FFDBF) rates were 71.3, 58.1, 49.8, 40.2, and 27.6%. The corresponding progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 55.3, 41.9, 33, 23.3, and 13.3%. RCC histology was associated with better LC (P = 0.0055). Although SRS alone could yield reasonable LC in patients with 1-4 radioresistant brain metastases, the risk of distant brain failure was substantial. The approach of routine omission of WBRT outside of a trial setting should be used judiciously.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Radiocirugia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Med Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Encefálicas / Radiocirugia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Med Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos