Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Breast volumetry using a three-dimensional surface assessment technique.
Koch, Martin C; Adamietz, Boris; Jud, Sebastian M; Fasching, Peter A; Haeberle, Lothar; Karbacher, Stefan; Veit, Klaus; Schulz-Wendtland, Ruediger; Uder, Michael; Beckmann, Matthias W; Bani, Mayada R; Heusinger, Katharina; Loehberg, Christian R; Cavallaro, Alexander.
Afiliación
  • Koch MC; University Breast Center Franconia, Department of OB/Gyn, University Hospital Erlangen, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 35(5): 847-55, 2011 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21487916
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Breast volume is a relevant measure for the prevention and prediction of diseases and for aesthetic surgery. This study evaluated a new technique to determine breast volume and compared measures using a three-dimensional (3D) body surface scanner and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, with the latter used as the standard method.

METHODS:

Both MRI scans and body surface 3D scans were obtained from 22 women. For each method, breast volumes were assessed. The MRI calculations of the breast volumes were performed by a specially trained radiologist using analysis software. A textured 3D image was generated by a calibrated digital texture camera after breast surface data acquisition. The volume assessment of the 3D photography was calculated using a software package after manual outlining of the breast and automated projection of a dorsal limit. Linear regression was used to predict the MRI volume assessment with the 3D image volume assessment.

RESULTS:

The mean breast volume according to MRI volumetry was 442.8 ml on the left side and 471.8 ml on the right side. The mean breast volume using a 3D body surface volume assessment method was 273.8 ml (observer A) and 226.2 ml (observer B) on the left side and 284.4 ml (observer A) and 234.9 ml (observer B) on the right side. The use of linear regression models showed R (2) values of 0.59-0.77. The mean time for MRI recording and volume assessment was 68.0 ± 14.1 min for both sides and 11.6 ± 1.5 min for 3D recording and volume assessment.

CONCLUSIONS:

The 3D surface-based volume measurements are feasible in terms of time and can predict the MRI breast volume with sufficient accuracy. This might facilitate the broad use of such an assessment technique in a large-scale epidemiologic study using breast volume as a study aim. Additionally, further development of volume assessments could help to implement this technique in breast surgery procedures.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Superficie Corporal / Mama / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador / Imagenología Tridimensional Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Aesthetic Plast Surg Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Superficie Corporal / Mama / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Interpretación de Imagen Asistida por Computador / Imagenología Tridimensional Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Aesthetic Plast Surg Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania