Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of sexual function in Brazilian women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and localized provoked vulvodynia.
Giraldo, Paulo César; Polpeta, Nádia Cristina; Juliato, Cássia Raquel Teatin; Yoshida, Laura Pagotto; do Amaral, Rose Luce Gomes; Eleutério Junior, José.
Afiliación
  • Giraldo PC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UNICAMP Medical School, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. giraldo@unicamp.br
J Sex Med ; 9(3): 805-11, 2012 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22214370
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Recurrent vulvovaginitis is an important trigger for inflammatory processes that in many cases may result in vulvovaginal pain. Vulvodynia, a vulvar disorder, can also cause a lot of pain in the female genitals. The sexual function in women with vulvodynia or recurrent vulvovaginitis will possibly be negatively affected and therefore should be evaluated.

AIM:

To assess sexual function in women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) and localized provoked vulvodynia (LPV) in comparison with women without lower genital tract dysfunction.

METHODS:

A 1-year cross-sectional study evaluated sexual function in 58 women (11 with RVVC, 18 with LPV, and 29 controls) seen at a university outpatient clinic. Sexual function was assessed by taking into account the results obtained from the application of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and Fisher's tests were used for statistical analysis. MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURE:

FSFI, a validated questionnaire in Portuguese.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences in the three groups with respect to age, marital status, schooling, race, body mass index, contraceptive method, and parity. The FSFI questionnaire total score found was 25.51 (±5.12), 21.17 (±5.15), and 29.56 (±3.87) for the RVVC, LPV, and control groups, respectively. The scores were significantly statistically lower in the study groups compared with the control group (P<0.05). Women with RVVC and LPV also had lower total scores compared with 26.55 values, considered a cutoff score for sexual dysfunction in literature. The LPV group showed a significant difference and scored worse in the domains of arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain but not in the domain of sexual desire. The same occurred with the RVVC group but only for the domains of orgasm and satisfaction.

CONCLUSION:

Women with RVVC and LPV had significantly more symptoms of sexual dysfunction than women without lower genital tract diseases.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas / Candidiasis Vulvovaginal / Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas / Vulvodinia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: J Sex Med Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas / Candidiasis Vulvovaginal / Disfunciones Sexuales Psicológicas / Vulvodinia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: America do sul / Brasil Idioma: En Revista: J Sex Med Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Año: 2012 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil