Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with decreased GFR: a meta-analysis.
Wang, Zhi Jian; Harjai, Kishore J; Shenoy, Chetan; Gao, Fei; Shi, Dong Mei; Liu, Yu Yang; Zhao, Ying Xin; Zhou, Yu Jie.
Afiliación
  • Wang ZJ; Department of Cardiology, Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 62(4): 711-21, 2013 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23773369
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is a strong predictor of both mortality and subsequent cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention. The safety and efficacy of drug-eluting (DESs) versus bare-metal stents (BMSs) in this population have not been evaluated adequately. STUDY

DESIGN:

A systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING & POPULATION Studies involving the comparison of clinical outcomes between DESs and BMSs in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Studies exclusively involving patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were excluded. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES MEDLINE (on Ovid), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 2002-2013 were searched for studies comparing DESs with BMSs in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2). INTERVENTION DES versus BMS implantation.

OUTCOMES:

Mortality, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS:

Data from 26 comparative studies with 66,840 patients were included. Compared with BMSs, DESs were associated with significant reductions in repeat revascularization (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.50-0.74; P < 0.001) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92; P < 0.001), with no detectable difference in stent thrombosis (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46-1.12; P = 0.1). The superiority of DESs over BMSs in decreasing mortality also was documented (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65-0.90; P = 0.01). This survival benefit of DESs over BMSs was attenuated in randomized controlled trials or adjusted observational studies versus unadjusted observational studies.

LIMITATIONS:

Most studies were observational studies. Meta-analysis was not performed on individual patient data.

CONCLUSIONS:

DES use in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) is associated with a reduced rate of repeat revascularization and myocardial infarction without increased risk of stent thrombosis. The true effect of DESs versus BMSs on mortality needs to be confirmed by randomized controlled trials.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trombosis / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Tasa de Filtración Glomerular / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Kidney Dis Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trombosis / Stents Liberadores de Fármacos / Tasa de Filtración Glomerular / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Am J Kidney Dis Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China