Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized controlled pilot trial comparing the impact of access to clinical endocrinology video demonstrations with access to usual revision resources on medical student performance of clinical endocrinology skills.
Hibbert, Emily J; Lambert, Tim; Carter, John N; Learoyd, Diana L; Twigg, Stephen; Clarke, Stephen.
Afiliación
  • Hibbert EJ; Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of Sydney, PO Box 63, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia. emily.hibbert@sydney.edu.au.
BMC Med Educ ; 13: 135, 2013 Oct 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24090039
BACKGROUND: Demonstrating competence in clinical skills is key to course completion for medical students. Methods of providing clinical instruction that foster immediate learning and potentially serve as longer-term repositories for on-demand revision, such as online videos demonstrating competent performance of clinical skills, are increasingly being used. However, their impact on learning has been little studied. The aim of this study was to determine the value of adjunctive on-demand video-based training for clinical skills acquisition by medical students in endocrinology. METHODS: Following an endocrinology clinical tutorial program, 2nd year medical students in the pre-assessment revision period were recruited and randomized to either a set of bespoke on-line clinical skills training videos (TV), or to revision as usual (RAU). The skills demonstrated on video were history taking in diabetes mellitus (DMH), examination for diabetes lower limb complications (LLE), and examination for signs of thyroid disease (TE). Students were assessed on these clinical skills in an observed structured clinical examination two weeks after randomization. Assessors were blinded to student randomization status. RESULTS: For both diabetes related clinical skills assessment tasks, students in the TV group performed significantly better than those in the RAU group. There were no between group differences in thyroid examination performance. For the LLE, 91.7% (n = 11/12) of students randomized to the video were rated globally as competent at the skill compared with 40% (n = 4/10) of students not randomized to the video (p = 0.024). For the DMH, 83.3% (n = 10/12) of students randomized to the video were rated globally as competent at the skill compared with 20% (n = 2/10) of students not randomized to the video (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Exposure to high quality videos demonstrating clinical skills can significantly improve medical student skill performance in an observed structured clinical examination of these skills, when used as an adjunct to clinical skills face-to-face tutorials and deliberate practice of skills in a blended learning format. Video demonstrations can provide an enduring, on-demand, portable resource for revision, which can even be used at the bedside by learners. Such resources are cost-effectively scalable for large numbers of learners.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grabación en Video / Competencia Clínica / Endocrinología Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grabación en Video / Competencia Clínica / Endocrinología Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia