Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
"Push as hard as you can" instruction for telephone cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized simulation study.
van Tulder, Raphael; Roth, Dominik; Havel, Christof; Eisenburger, Philip; Heidinger, Benedikt; Chwojka, Christof Constantin; Novosad, Heinz; Sterz, Fritz; Herkner, Harald; Schreiber, Wolfgang.
Afiliación
  • van Tulder R; Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Municipal Ambulance Service Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Roth D; Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Havel C; Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Eisenburger P; Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Heidinger B; Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Chwojka CC; NOTRUF NOE, Emergency Dispatch and Coordination Centre, Lower Austria, Austria.
  • Novosad H; NOTRUF NOE, Emergency Dispatch and Coordination Centre, Lower Austria, Austria.
  • Sterz F; Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Herkner H; Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Schreiber W; Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
J Emerg Med ; 46(3): 363-70, 2014 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24238592
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The medical priority dispatch system (MPDS®) assists lay rescuers in protocol-driven telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim was to clarify which CPR instruction leads to sufficient compression depth.

METHODS:

This was an investigator-blinded, randomized, parallel group, simulation study to investigate 10 min of chest compressions after the instruction "push down firmly 5 cm" vs. "push as hard as you can." Primary outcome was defined as compression depth. Secondary outcomes were participants exertion measured by Borg scale, provider's systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and quality values measured by the skill-reporting program of the Resusci(®) Anne Simulator manikin. For the analysis of the primary outcome, we used a linear random intercept model to allow for the repeated measurements with the intervention as a covariate.

RESULTS:

Thirteen participants were allocated to control and intervention. One participant (intervention) dropped out after min 7 because of exhaustion. Primary outcome showed a mean compression depth of 44.1 mm, with an inter-individual standard deviation (SDb) of 13.0 mm and an intra-individual standard deviation (SDw) of 6.7 mm for the control group vs. 46.1 mm and a SDb of 9.0 mm and SDw of 10.3 mm for the intervention group (difference 1.9; 95% confidence interval -6.9 to 10.8; p = 0.66). Secondary outcomes showed no difference for exhaustion and CPR-quality values.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is no difference in compression depth, quality of CPR, or physical strain on lay rescuers using the initial instruction "push as hard as you can" vs. the standard MPDS(®) instruction "push down firmly 5 cm."
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Teléfono / Conducta Verbal / Reanimación Cardiopulmonar / Masaje Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Teléfono / Conducta Verbal / Reanimación Cardiopulmonar / Masaje Cardíaco Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria