Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors associated with early recurrence and death after esophagectomy for cancer.
Davies, Andrew R; Pillai, Andrew; Sinha, Pranab; Sandhu, Harinderjeet; Adeniran, Amina; Mattsson, Fredrik; Choudhury, Asif; Forshaw, Matthew J; Gossage, James A; Lagergren, Jesper; Allum, William H; Mason, Robert C.
Afiliación
  • Davies AR; Department of Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Unit of Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Surg Oncol ; 109(5): 459-64, 2014 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24301461
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Accurate selection of patients for radical treatment of esophageal cancer is essential to avoid early recurrence and death (ERD) after surgery. We sought to evaluate a large series of consecutive resections to assess factors that may be associated with this poor outcome.

METHODS:

This was a cohort study including 680 patients operated for esophageal cancer between 2000 and 2010. The poor outcome group comprised 100 patients with tumor recurrence and death within 1 year of surgery. The comparison group comprised 267 long-term survivors, defined as those surviving more than 3 years from surgery. Pathological characteristics associated with poor outcome were analyzed using logistic regression to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS:

On the adjusted model T stage and N stage predicted poor survival, with the greatest risk being patients with locally advanced tumors and three or more involved lymph nodes (OR 10.6, 95% CI 2.8-40.0). Poor differentiation (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.4-5.5), chemotherapy response (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2-10.6), and involved resection margins (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2-6.0) were all significant independent prognostic markers in the multivariable model. There was a trend toward worse survival with lymphovascular invasion (OR 2.0, 95% CI 0.9-4.2) and low albumin (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.8-4.4) but not of statistical significance in the adjusted model.

CONCLUSIONS:

Esophageal cancer patients with poorly differentiated tumors and three or more involved lymph nodes have a particularly high risk of ERD after surgery. Accurate risk stratification of patients may identify a group who would be better served by alternative oncological treatment strategies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Oncol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido