Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of the G-8 geriatric-oncology screening tool for identifying vulnerable elderly patients with cancer according to tumour site: the ELCAPA-02 study.
Liuu, Evelyne; Canouï-Poitrine, Florence; Tournigand, Christophe; Laurent, Marie; Caillet, Philippe; Le Thuaut, Aurelie; Vincent, Helene; Culine, Stephane; Audureau, Etienne; Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie; Paillaud, Elena.
Afiliación
  • Liuu E; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Onco-Geriatric Clinic, F-94010 Créteil, France. Electronic address: evelyne.liuu@hmn.aphp.fr.
  • Canouï-Poitrine F; Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), LIC EA 4393, F-94010 Créteil, France; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Public Health, F-94010 Créteil, France.
  • Tournigand C; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Medical Oncology, F-94010, France.
  • Laurent M; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Onco-Geriatric Clinic, F-94010 Créteil, France; Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), LIC EA 4393, F-94010 Créteil, France.
  • Caillet P; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Onco-Geriatric Clinic, F-94010 Créteil, France; Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), LIC EA 4393, F-94010 Créteil, France.
  • Le Thuaut A; Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), LIC EA 4393, F-94010 Créteil, France; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Public Health, F-94010 Créteil, France; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Clinical Research Unit (URC-Mondor), F-94010 Créteil, France.
  • Vincent H; AP-HP, hôpital Paul-Brousse, Department of Geriatrics, F-94804 Villejuif, France.
  • Culine S; AP-HP, hôpital Saint-Louis, Department of Medical Oncology, F-75010 Paris, France.
  • Audureau E; Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), LIC EA 4393, F-94010 Créteil, France; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Public Health, F-94010 Créteil, France.
  • Bastuji-Garin S; Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), LIC EA 4393, F-94010 Créteil, France; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Public Health, F-94010 Créteil, France; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Clinical Research Unit (URC-Mondor), F-94010 Créteil, France.
  • Paillaud E; AP-HP, hôpital Henri-Mondor, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Onco-Geriatric Clinic, F-94010 Créteil, France; Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), LIC EA 4393, F-94010 Créteil, France.
J Geriatr Oncol ; 5(1): 11-9, 2014 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24484713
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: G-8 screening tool showed good screening properties for identifying vulnerable elderly patients with cancer who would benefit from a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). We investigated whether tumour site and metastatic status affected its accuracy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Geriatric-oncology clinics of two teaching hospitals in the urban area of Paris. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 70 or over (n = 518) with breast ( n= 113), colorectal (n = 108), urinary-tract (n = 89), upper gastrointestinal/liver (n = 85), prostate (n = 69), or other cancers (n = 54). MEASUREMENTS: Reference standard for diagnosing vulnerability was the presence of at least one abnormal test among the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Instrumental ADL, Mini-Mental State Examination, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics, Timed Get-Up-and-Go, and Mini-Geriatric Depression Scale. Sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of G-8 scores ≤ 14 were compared according to tumour site and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Median age was 80; 48.2% had metastases. Prevalence of vulnerability and abnormal G-8 score was 84.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 81-87.3) and 79.5% (95% CI, 76-83). The G-8 was 86.9% sensitive (95% CI, 83.4-89.9) and 59.8% specific (95% CI, 48.3-70.4). G-8 performance varied significantly (all p values < 0.001) across tumour sites (sensitivity, 65.2% in prostate cancer to 95.1% in upper gastrointestinal/liver cancer; and specificity, 23.1% in colorectal cancer to 95.7% in prostate cancer) and metastatic status (sensitivity and specificity, 93.8% and 53.3% in patients with metastases vs. 79.5% and 63.3% in those without, respectively). Differences remained significant after adjustment on age and performance status. CONCLUSION: These G-8 accuracy variations across tumour sites should be considered when using G-8 to identify elderly patients with cancer who could benefit from CGA.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Geriatr Oncol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Detección Precoz del Cáncer / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Geriatr Oncol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article