Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Poor prognosis patients with inoperable locally advanced NSCLC and large tumors benefit from palliative chemoradiotherapy: a subset analysis from a randomized clinical phase III trial.
Strøm, Hans H; Bremnes, Roy M; Sundstrøm, Stein H; Helbekkmo, Nina; Aasebø, Ulf.
Afiliación
  • Strøm HH; *Department of Medicine, Helgeland Hospital, Sandnessjøen, Norway; †Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway; ‡Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; §The Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; and ‖Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
J Thorac Oncol ; 9(6): 825-33, 2014 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24807158
INTRODUCTION: Poor prognosis patients with bulky stage III locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer may not be offered concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Following a phase III trial concerning the effect of palliative CRT in inoperable poor prognosis patients, this analysis was performed to explore how tumor size influenced survival and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: A total of 188 poor prognosis patients recruited in a randomized clinical trial received four courses intravenous carboplatin day 1 and oral vinorelbine day 1 and 8, at 3-week intervals. The experimental arm (N = 94) received radiotherapy with fractionation 42 Gy/15, starting at the second chemotherapy course. This subset study compares outcomes in patients with tumors larger than 7 cm (N = 108) versus tumors 7 cm or smaller (N = 76). RESULTS: Among those with tumors larger than 7 cm, the median overall survival in the chemotherapy versus CRT arm was 9.7 and 13.4 months, respectively (p = 0.001). The 1-year survival was 33% and 56%, respectively (p = 0.01). Except for a temporary decline during treatment, HRQOL was maintained in the CRT arm, regardless of tumor size. Among those who did not receive CRT, patients with tumors larger than 7 cm experienced a gradual decline in the HRQOL. The CRT group had significantly more esophagitis and hospitalizations because of side effects regardless of tumor size. CONCLUSION: In patients with poor prognosis and inoperable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, large tumor size should not be considered a negative predictive factor. Except for performance status 2, patients with tumors larger than 7 cm apparently benefit from CRT.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Quimioradioterapia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Oncol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidados Paliativos / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Quimioradioterapia / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Oncol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Noruega