Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and durability of central oversewing for treatment of aortic insufficiency in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.
Schechter, Matthew A; Joseph, Jeremy T; Krishnamoorthy, Arun; Finet, J E; Finet, J Emanuel; Ganapathi, Asvin M; Lodge, Andrew J; Milano, Carmelo A; Patel, Chetan B.
Afiliación
  • Schechter MA; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Joseph JT; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Krishnamoorthy A; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Finet JE; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Finet JE; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Ganapathi AM; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Lodge AJ; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Milano CA; Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Patel CB; Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: chetan.patel@dm.duke.edu.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 33(9): 937-42, 2014 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24997496
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Aortic insufficiency (AI) in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) results in regurgitant volume returning from the aorta to the left ventricle, increased LVAD pump volume and reduced systemic cardiac output. One common strategy to address AI during CF-LVAD support is central oversewing of the aortic valve, which allows some opening between the valve leaflets laterally. However, the long-term durability of this technique has not been extensively described.

METHODS:

All patients who underwent central oversewing of the aortic valve during CF-LVAD support between January 2006 and March 2013 were included in this analysis. Pre- and post-procedure intra-operative transesophageal echocardiograms (TEEs) were reviewed to determine the efficacy of the surgical technique, whereas all subsequent transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) were reviewed to assess durability. AI severity was graded using the vena contracta (VC) width and the ratio between the VC and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter.

RESULTS:

Nineteen patients with central aortic valve oversewing were identified. Median follow-up was 560 days (range 46 to 954 days). All but 1 patient had their aortic insufficiency reduced to "none/trace" on post-operative TEE. There was no statistically significant increase in the VC width and VC/LVOT ratio between the first and last follow-up echocardiograms, and only 2 patients developed more than mild aortic insufficiency after central oversewing. Central oversewing of the aortic valve did not adversely affect outcomes after LVAD implantation.

CONCLUSION:

Central oversewing of the aortic valve is an effective and durable means of addressing greater than mild AI in patients with CF-LVAD.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Válvula Aórtica / Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica / Corazón Auxiliar / Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Heart Lung Transplant Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Válvula Aórtica / Insuficiencia de la Válvula Aórtica / Corazón Auxiliar / Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Heart Lung Transplant Asunto de la revista: CARDIOLOGIA / TRANSPLANTE Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article