Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ventilatory efficiency before and after lung volume reduction surgery.
Armstrong, Hilary F; Dussault, Nicole E; Thirapatarapong, Wilawan; Lemieux, Renee S; Thomashow, Byron M; Bartels, Matthew N.
Afiliación
  • Armstrong HF; Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York hfa2104@columbia.edu.
  • Dussault NE; Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Thirapatarapong W; Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Lemieux RS; Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Thomashow BM; Department of Medicine: Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
  • Bartels MN; Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
Respir Care ; 60(1): 63-71, 2015 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25371397
BACKGROUND: Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been shown to improve the clearance of carbon dioxide and minute ventilation (V̇E) in select patients with COPD. One variable often assessed in COPD is ventilatory efficiency (V̇E/V̇CO2 ). METHODS: We compared 55 LVRS subjects with 25 controls from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. V̇E/V̇CO2 was calculated from cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and 6-months. We sought to assess V̇E/V̇CO2 changes with LVRS compared with controls who only received standard medical care. RESULTS: At 6 months, the LVRS group significantly increased peak V̇O2 , work load, V̇E, V̇CO2 , and tidal volume while lowering peak and lowest V̇E/V̇CO2 (improved ventilatory efficiency) and end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure. The control group did not display these changes. The changes were greatest in the LVRS subjects who improved their exercise capacity after surgery (> 10 W). CONCLUSIONS: The changes were greatest in the LVRS subjects who showed the most functional improvement, indicating an association of improved ventilation with improved functional outcome.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonectomía / Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar / Tolerancia al Ejercicio / Ventilación Pulmonar / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respir Care Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neumonectomía / Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar / Tolerancia al Ejercicio / Ventilación Pulmonar / Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Respir Care Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article