Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Revisions after failed gastric band: sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Gonzalez-Heredia, Raquel; Masrur, Mario; Patton, Kristin; Bindal, Vivek; Sarvepalli, Shravan; Elli, Enrique.
Afiliación
  • Gonzalez-Heredia R; College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, 435 E, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA, rgheredi@uic.edu.
Surg Endosc ; 29(9): 2533-7, 2015 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25427419
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Laparoscopic gastric band is an appealing bariatric operation due to its simplicity and good short-term outcomes; however, it is associated with complications (slippage, erosion, prolapse) and failure in reaching target weight loss. This study describes our experience with failed gastric bands that required a revisional procedure. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This single-center retrospective analysis includes all consecutive patients who underwent a gastric band removal and revisional surgery in our hospital from January 2008 to June 2014. A total of 81 patients were identified and divided in three groups Group one included patients who just had the gastric band removed (43), group two consisted of patients who underwent a conversion to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (26), and group three included patients who required a conversion to Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (12). Patient demographics, date of gastric band placement, indications for revision, postoperative morbidity and mortality, operating time, blood loss, length of stay, and % excess weight loss (%EWL) were recorded. Perioperative and clinical outcomes were compared between conversions to SG and RYGB.

RESULTS:

In group two (n = 26), 21 conversions to SG were performed in concurrence with the band removal as a one-stage operation, while five procedures were performed in two-stages. There were no complications and no case was converted to open. Patients who underwent a one-stage procedure had a longer operative time, although it did not reach statistical significance. In group three, 12 patients underwent a conversion to RYGB as a revisional operation; 11 were performed as a one-stage procedure and only one patient underwent a two-stage procedure.

CONCLUSIONS:

SG and RYGB are safe options to revise a failed gastric band. Both groups who received either a SG or RYGB had a low complication rate and acceptable %EWL with no statistical difference between the two.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Gastroplastia / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Obesidad Mórbida / Derivación Gástrica / Gastroplastia / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article