Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Precautionary practices of healthcare workers who disinfect medical and dental devices using high-level disinfectants.
Henn, Scott A; Boiano, James M; Steege, Andrea L.
Afiliación
  • Henn SA; Division of Surveillance,Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies,National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Cincinnati,OH 45226.
  • Boiano JM; Division of Surveillance,Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies,National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Cincinnati,OH 45226.
  • Steege AL; Division of Surveillance,Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies,National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Cincinnati,OH 45226.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(2): 180-5, 2015 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25633000
BACKGROUND High-level disinfectants (HLDs) are used throughout the healthcare industry to chemically disinfect reusable, semicritical medical and dental devices to control and prevent healthcare-associated infections among patient populations. Workers who use HLDs are at risk of exposure to these chemicals, some of which are respiratory and skin irritants and sensitizers. OBJECTIVE To evaluate exposure controls used and to better understand impediments to healthcare workers using personal protective equipment while handling HLDs. DESIGN Web-based survey. PARTICIPANTS A targeted sample of members of professional practice organizations representing nurses, technologists/technicians, dental professionals, respiratory therapists, and others who reported handling HLDs in the previous 7 calendar days. Participating organizations invited either all or a random sample of members via email, which included a hyperlink to the survey. METHODS Descriptive analyses were conducted including simple frequencies and prevalences. RESULTS A total of 4,657 respondents completed the survey. The HLDs used most often were glutaraldehyde (59%), peracetic acid (16%), and ortho-phthalaldehyde (15%). Examples of work practices or events that could increase exposure risk included failure to wear water-resistant gowns (44%); absence of standard procedures for minimizing exposure (19%); lack of safe handling training (17%); failure to wear protective gloves (9%); and a spill/leak of HLD during handling (5%). Among all respondents, 12% reported skin contact with HLDs, and 33% of these respondents reported that they did not always wear gloves. CONCLUSION Findings indicated that precautionary practices were not always used, underscoring the importance of improved employer and worker training and education regarding HLD hazards.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Equipos de Seguridad / Exposición Profesional / Salud Laboral / Personal de Salud / Desinfectantes Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / ENFERMAGEM / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Equipos de Seguridad / Exposición Profesional / Salud Laboral / Personal de Salud / Desinfectantes Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / ENFERMAGEM / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article