Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Androgen deprivation therapy and the risk of death from prostate cancer among men with favorable or unfavorable intermediate-risk disease.
Keane, Florence K; Chen, Ming-Hui; Zhang, Danjie; Moran, Brian J; Braccioforte, Michelle H; D'Amico, Anthony V.
Afiliación
  • Keane FK; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Chen MH; Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
  • Zhang D; Department of Statistics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
  • Moran BJ; Prostate Cancer Foundation of Chicago, Westmont, Illinois.
  • Braccioforte MH; Prostate Cancer Foundation of Chicago, Westmont, Illinois.
  • D'Amico AV; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cancer ; 121(16): 2713-9, 2015 Aug 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25925789
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Radiotherapy (RT), short-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and brachytherapy in various combinations are treatment options for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC), but the question of which combination if any is necessary to minimize PC-specific mortality (PCSM) risk in patients with favorable or unfavorable intermediate-risk PC is unknown. The authors assessed PCSM risk after commonly used treatments.

METHODS:

The cohort consisted of 2510 men with favorable (1902 men; 75.78%) or unfavorable (608 men; 24.22%) intermediate-risk PC who were treated from 1997 to 2013. Treatment included brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant ADT among men with favorable disease and brachytherapy with neoadjuvant RT or ADT among men with unfavorable disease. Fine and Gray's competing-risks regression model was used to assess whether ADT among men with favorable disease or RT or ADT among men with unfavorable disease decreased PCSM risk after adjusting for treatment propensity score, year of brachytherapy, and PC prognostic factors.

RESULTS:

After a median follow-up of 7.78 years, 366 deaths (14.58%) were observed, 29 of which (7.92%) were from PC. There was a significant reduction in PCSM risk in men with unfavorable disease who were treated with ADT versus RT (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.91 [P = .03]), but no significant difference in PCSM risk in men with favorable disease who received ADT and brachytherapy versus brachytherapy (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-2.57 [P =.56]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Neoadjuvant ADT does not appear to reduce PCSM risk in men undergoing brachytherapy for favorable intermediate-risk PC and should not be considered a standard; however, it appears superior to neoadjuvant RT in men with unfavorable intermediate-risk PC undergoing brachytherapy, making neoadjuvant ADT and brachytherapy a preferred option in these men.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Antagonistas de Andrógenos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Próstata / Antagonistas de Andrógenos Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article