Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ertapenem usage in cancer patients with and without neutropenia: a report on 97 cases from a comprehensive cancer center.
Nesher, L; Tverdek, F P; Mahajan, S N; Chemaly, R F; Rolston, Kenneth V I.
Afiliación
  • Nesher L; Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (Unit 1460), Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Tverdek FP; Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (Unit 1460), Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Mahajan SN; Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (Unit 1460), Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Chemaly RF; Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (Unit 1460), Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
  • Rolston KV; Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd (Unit 1460), Houston, TX, 77030, USA. krolston@mdanderson.org.
Infection ; 43(5): 545-50, 2015 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25929421
PURPOSE: Ertapenem is being increasingly utilized in cancer patients, but published data regarding its usage are limited. Our objective was to describe the various indications for ertapenem therapy and its safety and efficacy in cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of cancer patients who received monotherapy with ertapenem for at least 72 h, between January 2007 and February 2013. RESULTS: Among 97 unique patients who received ertapenem monotherapy, the most common indications were: (1) To facilitate discharge from the hospital of stable patients still requiring antimicrobial therapy (46 %). (2) Primary therapy of various documented infections (bacteremia, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, skin and skin structure infection) with ertapenem (28 %). (3) De-escalation from a different broad-spectrum agent or regimen to ertapenem within the hospital setting in patients not ready for discharge (25 %). The median age of the 97 patients studied was 59 years (range 9-87 years) with 52 % being men. Most patients had underlying hematologic malignancies (54 %), and 7 % were recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Twenty-nine patients (30 %) were neutropenic, 26 % were diabetic, and 6 % had chronic lung disease. Primary ertapenem monotherapy was successful in all patients, de-escalation in 95.8 % of patients, and the strategy of discharge on outpatient therapy with ertapenem in 95.6 % of patients. Patients failing de-escalation or early discharge responded to alternative regimens. We documented no significant ertapenem associated toxicity or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ertapenem appears to be safe and effective for several indications in cancer patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Bacterianas / Beta-Lactamas / Utilización de Medicamentos / Antibacterianos / Neoplasias / Neutropenia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Infection Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Bacterianas / Beta-Lactamas / Utilización de Medicamentos / Antibacterianos / Neoplasias / Neutropenia Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Infection Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos