Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times: longitudinal reproducibility and variations using different coils, MR systems and sites.
Li, X; Pedoia, V; Kumar, D; Rivoire, J; Wyatt, C; Lansdown, D; Amano, K; Okazaki, N; Savic, D; Koff, M F; Felmlee, J; Williams, S L; Majumdar, S.
Afiliación
  • Li X; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: xiaojuan.li@ucsf.edu.
  • Pedoia V; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Kumar D; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of Physical Therapy, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Rivoire J; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Wyatt C; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Lansdown D; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Amano K; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Okazaki N; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Savic D; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Koff MF; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
  • Felmlee J; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Williams SL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Majumdar S; University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 23(12): 2214-2223, 2015 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26187574
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the longitudinal reproducibility and variations of cartilage T1ρ and T2 measurements using different coils, MR systems and sites. METHODS: Single-Site study: Phantom data were collected monthly for up to 29 months on four GE 3T MR systems. Data from phantoms and human subjects were collected on two MR systems using the same model of coil; and were collected on one MR system using two models of coils. Multi-site study: Three participating sites used the same model of MR systems and coils, and identical imaging protocols. Phantom data were collected monthly. Human subjects were scanned and rescanned on the same day at each site. Two traveling human subjects were scanned at all three sites. RESULTS: Single-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.8% to 2.7% for T1ρ and 1.8-2.8% for T2. Significant differences were found in T1ρ and T2 values using different MR systems and coils. Multi-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.3% to 2.6% for T1ρ and 1.2-2.7% for T2. Across three sites (n = 16), the in vivo scan-rescan RMS-CV was 3.1% and 4.0% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. Phantom T1ρ and T2 values were significantly different between three sites but highly correlated (R > 0.99). No significant difference was found in T1ρ and T2 values of traveling controls, with cross-site RMS-CV as 4.9% and 4.4% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. CONCLUSION: With careful quality control and cross-calibration, quantitative MRI can be readily applied in multi-site studies and clinical trials for evaluating cartilage degeneration.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cartílago Articular / Fantasmas de Imagen / Osteoartritis de la Rodilla / Articulación de la Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA / REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cartílago Articular / Fantasmas de Imagen / Osteoartritis de la Rodilla / Articulación de la Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA / REUMATOLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article