Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Intrapartum and neonatal mortality in primary midwife-led and secondary obstetrician-led care in the Amsterdam region of the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study.
Wiegerinck, M M J; van der Goes, B Y; Ravelli, A C J; van der Post, J A M; Klinkert, J; Brandenbarg, J; Buist, F C D; Wouters, M G A J; Tamminga, P; de Jonge, A; Mol, B W.
Afiliación
  • Wiegerinck MM; Academic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: m.m.wiegerinck@amc.uva.nl.
  • van der Goes BY; Academic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: b.y.vandergoes@amc.uva.nl.
  • Ravelli AC; Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Academic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: a.c.ravelli@amc.uva.nl.
  • van der Post JA; Academic Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.a.vanderpost@amc.uva.nl.
  • Klinkert J; Midwives in Primary care Amsterdam and Amstelland (EVAA), Rijtuigenhof 105, 1054 NC Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jokeklinkert@gmail.com.
  • Brandenbarg J; Practice for Obstetrics, Dietetics and Coaching, Margaretha van Borsselenlaan 39, 1181 CZ, Amstelveen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jokebrandenbarg@xs4all.nl.
  • Buist FC; VU University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: fcd.buist@vumc.nl.
  • Wouters MG; VU University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: mgaj.wouters@vumc.nl.
  • Tamminga P; Emma Children's Hospital AMC, Neonatal Intensive Care, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: p.tamminga@amc.uva.nl.
  • de Jonge A; AVAG/ EMGO+, VU University Medical Center, Department of Midwifery Science, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: ank.dejonge@vumc.nl.
  • Mol BW; The Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, K William Street 72, 5000SA Adelaide, Australia. Electronic address: b.w.mol@amc.uva.nl.
Midwifery ; 31(12): 1168-76, 2015 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26386517
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare intrapartum- and neonatal mortality and intervention rates in term women starting labour in primary midwife-led versus secondary obstetrician-led care.

DESIGN:

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING:

Amsterdam region of the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS:

Women with singleton pregnancies who gave birth beyond 37+0 weeks gestation in the years 2005 up to 2008 and lived in the catchment area of the neonatal intensive care units of both academic hospitals in Amsterdam. Women with a primary caesarean section or a pregnancy complicated by antepartum death or major congenital anomalies were excluded. For women in the midwife-led care group, a home or hospital birth could be planned. MEASUREMENTS Analysis of linked data from the national perinatal register, and hospital- and midwifery record data. We assessed (unadjusted) relative risks with confidence intervals. Main outcome measures were incidences of intrapartum and neonatal (<28 days) mortality. Secondary outcomes included incidences of caesarean section and vaginal instrumental delivery.

FINDINGS:

53,123 women started labour in primary care and 30,166 women in secondary care. Intrapartum and neonatal mortality rates were 37/53,123 (0.70‰) in the primary care group and 24/30,166 (0.80‰) in the secondary care group (relative risk 0.88; 95% CI 0.52-1.46). Women in the primary care group were less likely to deliver by secondary caesarean section (5% versus 16%; RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.30-0.32) or by instrumental delivery (10% versus 13%; RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.73-0.79). KEY

CONCLUSIONS:

We found a low absolute risk of intrapartum and neonatal mortality, with a comparable risk for women who started labour in primary versus secondary care. The intervention rate was significantly lower in women who started labour in primary care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE These findings suggest that it is possible to identify a group of women at low risk of complications that can start labour in primary care and have low rates of medical interventions whereas perinatal mortality is low.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Resultado del Embarazo / Mortalidad Perinatal / Muerte Fetal / Parto Domiciliario / Partería Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Midwifery Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Resultado del Embarazo / Mortalidad Perinatal / Muerte Fetal / Parto Domiciliario / Partería Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Midwifery Asunto de la revista: ENFERMAGEM / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article