Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic significance of placenta growth factor expression in patients with multiple cancers: a meta-analysis.
Meng, Fan-Jun; Xiao, Shu-Xin; Zhang, Yan; Wang, Wei; Wang, Bin; Fan, Xin-Yi.
Afiliación
  • Meng FJ; Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
  • Xiao SX; Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
  • Zhang Y; Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
  • Wang W; Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
  • Wang B; Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
  • Fan XY; Department of Endocrinology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University Qingdao 266003, Shandong Province, China.
Int J Clin Exp Med ; 8(8): 12726-35, 2015.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26550186
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Placenta growth factor (PLGF) is a member of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family which is associated with the progression and metastasis of cancer. However, whether it can be used to predict prognosis in multiple cancer is still inconsistent.

METHODS:

A meta-analysis was performed by searching electronic databases updated to December 2014. Eligible studies which evaluated the relationship between PLGF expression level and survival of patients with multiple cancers were conducted. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS:

Nineteen studies with a variety of cancers were included for the meta-analysis. Combined HR suggested that high expression of PLGF significantly associated with a poor OS (HR=1.69, 95% CI, 1.32-2.16), and PFS (HR=1.8, 95% CI, 1.33-2.44) in patients with different cancers. Moreover, a subgroup analysis based on cancer type demonstrated that high expression level of PLGF predict poor OS in both digestive system carcinoma (HR=1.63, 95% CI, 1.21-2.19; I(2)=80.7%, P<0.001) and respiratory system tumor (HR=1.75, 95% CI, 1.28-2.41; I(2)=0.0%, P=0.394). For PFS, the similar result was found in respiratory system tumor (HR=1.64, 95% CI, 1.23-2.19; I(2)=0.0%, P=0.807), but not in digestive system carcinoma (HR=1.81, 95% CI, 0.93-3.52; I(2)=80.2%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Our meta-analysis demonstrates that PLGF might be regarded as a poor prognostic fact for multiple cancers. More large-scale and well-designed studies are still needed to strengthen our findings.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Exp Med Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Int J Clin Exp Med Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China