Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomised controlled trial of GP-led in-hospital management of homeless people ('Pathway').
Hewett, Nigel; Buchman, Peter; Musariri, Jeflyn; Sargeant, Christopher; Johnson, Penny; Abeysekera, Kushala; Grant, Louise; Oliver, Emily A; Eleftheriades, Christopher; McCormick, Barry; Halligan, Aidan; Marlin, Nadine; Kerry, Sally; Foster, Graham R.
Afiliación
  • Hewett N; Medical Director Pathway, University College Hospital Homeless Team, London, UK.
  • Buchman P; Health E1 Homeless Medical Centre, London, UK.
  • Musariri J; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK, and Division of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
  • Sargeant C; Brighton and Sussex University Hospital, Brighton, UK.
  • Johnson P; Brighton and Sussex University Hospital, Brighton, UK.
  • Abeysekera K; Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Grant L; Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Oliver EA; Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Eleftheriades C; Centre for Health Service Economics and Organisation, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • McCormick B; Centre for Health Service Economics and Organisation, Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
  • Halligan A; Pathway, RIP, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Marlin N; Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Kerry S; Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
  • Foster GR; Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Clin Med (Lond) ; 16(3): 223-9, 2016 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27251910
Homeless people have complex problems. GP enhanced care (Pathway) has shown benefits. We performed a randomised, -parallel arm trial at two large inner city hospitals. Inpatient homeless adults were randomly allocated to either standard care (all management by the hospital-based clinical team) or enhanced care with input from a homeless care team. The hospital data system provided healthcare usage information, and we used questionnaires to assess quality of life. 206 patients were allocated to enhanced care and 204 to usual care. Length of stay (up to 90 days after admission) did not differ between groups (standard care 14.0 days, enhanced care 13.3 days). Average reattendance at the emergency department within a year was 5.8 visits in the standard care group and 4.8 visits with enhanced care, but this decrease was not significant. -Quality of life scores after discharge (in 108 patients) improved with enhanced care (EQ-5D-5L score increased by 0.12 [95% CI 0.032 to 0.22] compared wtih 0.03 [-0.1 to 0.15; p=0.076] with standard care). The proportion of people sleeping on the streets after discharge was 14.6% in the standard care arm and 3.8% in the enhanced care arm (p=0.034). The quality-of-life cost per quality-adjusted life-year was £26,000. The Pathway approach doesn't alter length of stay but improves quality of life and reduces street -homelessness.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Personas con Mala Vivienda / Médicos Generales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Med (Lond) Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Personas con Mala Vivienda / Médicos Generales Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Med (Lond) Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article