Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Improving Nurses' Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Knowledge, Confidence, and Skills Using a Simulation-Based Blended Learning Program: A Randomized Trial.
Keleekai, Nowai L; Schuster, Catherine A; Murray, Connie L; King, Mary Anne; Stahl, Brian R; Labrozzi, Laura J; Gallucci, Susan; LeClair, Matthew W; Glover, Kevin R.
Afiliación
  • Keleekai NL; From Nursing Administration (N.L.K.), Orientation and Education (M.A.K., L.J.L., S.G.), Overlook Medical Center, Summit, NJ; Clinical Education and Training (C.A.S., C.L.M., B.R.S., K.R.G.), Curriculum Development, Electronic, and Mobile Learning (M.W.L.), B. Braun Medical, Inc., Bethlehem, PA.
Simul Healthc ; 11(6): 376-384, 2016 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27504890
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion is one of the most common invasive procedures performed in a hospital, but most nurses receive little formal training in this area. Blended PIVC insertion training programs that incorporate deliberate simulated practice have the potential to improve clinical practice and patient care.

METHODS:

The study was a randomized, wait-list control group with crossover using nurses on three medical/surgical units. Baseline PIVC knowledge, confidence, and skills assessments were completed for both groups. The intervention group then received a 2-hour PIVC online course, followed by an 8-hour live training course using a synergistic mix of three simulation tools. Both groups were then reassessed. After crossover, the wait-list group received the same intervention and both groups were reassessed.

RESULTS:

At baseline, both groups were similar for knowledge, confidence, and skills. Compared with the wait-list group, the intervention group had significantly higher scores for knowledge, confidence, and skills upon completing the training program. After crossover, the wait-list group had similarly higher scores for knowledge, confidence, and skills than the intervention group. Between the immediate preintervention and postintervention periods, the intervention group improved scores for knowledge by 31%, skills by 24%, and decreased confidence by 0.5%, whereas the wait-list group improved scores for knowledge by 28%, confidence by 16%, and skills by 15%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Results demonstrate significant improvements in nurses' knowledge, confidence, and skills with the use of a simulation-based blended learning program for PIVC insertion. Transferability of these findings from a simulated environment into clinical practice should be further explored.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Competencia Clínica / Autoeficacia / Educación en Enfermería / Entrenamiento Simulado Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Simul Healthc Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Panamá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cateterismo Periférico / Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud / Competencia Clínica / Autoeficacia / Educación en Enfermería / Entrenamiento Simulado Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Simul Healthc Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Panamá