Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Plerixafor as preemptive strategy results in high success rates in autologous stem cell mobilization failure.
Worel, Nina; Fritsch, Gerhard; Agis, Hermine; Böhm, Alexandra; Engelich, Georg; Leitner, Gerda C; Geissler, Klaus; Gleixner, Karoline; Kalhs, Peter; Buxhofer-Ausch, Veronika; Keil, Felix; Kopetzky, Gerhard; Mayr, Viktor; Rabitsch, Werner; Reisner, Regina; Rosskopf, Konrad; Ruckser, Reinhard; Zoghlami, Claudia; Zojer, Niklas; Greinix, Hildegard T.
Afiliación
  • Worel N; Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Fritsch G; Children?s Cancer Research Institute (CCRI), St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, Vienna, Austria.
  • Agis H; Medical Department I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Böhm A; First Medical Department, Elisabethinen Hospital, Linz, Austria.
  • Engelich G; First Medical Department, Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
  • Leitner GC; Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Geissler K; Department of Internal Medicine V, Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Gleixner K; Medical Department I, Division of Haematology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kalhs P; Medical Department I, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Buxhofer-Ausch V; First Medical Department, Elisabethinen Hospital, Linz, Austria.
  • Keil F; Third Medical Department, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kopetzky G; Department of Medicine I, General Hospital, St Poelten, Austria.
  • Mayr V; Medical Department II, Hospital Krems, Austria.
  • Rabitsch W; Medical Department I, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Reisner R; Third Medical Department, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Rosskopf K; Department of Blood Group Serology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
  • Ruckser R; Medical Department II, Division of Oncology, Donauhospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Zoghlami C; Department of Internal Medicine V, Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Zojer N; Department of Internal Medicine I, Wilhelminen Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Greinix HT; Division of Haematology, Medical University of Graz, Austria.
J Clin Apher ; 32(4): 224-234, 2017 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27578390
Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is approved for autologous stem cell mobilization in poor mobilizing patients with multiple myeloma or malignant lymphoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of plerixafor in an immediate rescue approach, administrated subsequently to G-CSF alone or chemotherapy and G-CSF in patients at risk for mobilization failure. Eighty-five patients mobilized with G-CSF alone or chemotherapy were included. Primary endpoint was the efficacy of the immediate rescue approach of plerixafor to achieve ≥2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for a single or ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for a double transplantation and potential differences between G-CSF and chemotherapy-based mobilization. Secondary objectives included comparison of stem cell graft composition including CD34+ cell and lymphocyte subsets with regard to the mobilization regimen applied. No significant adverse events were recorded. A median 3.9-fold increase in CD34+ cells following plerixafor was observed, resulting in 97% patients achieving at least ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Significantly more differentiated granulocyte and monocyte forming myeloid progenitors were collected after chemomobilization whereas more CD19+ and natural killer cells were collected after G-CSF. Fifty-two patients underwent transplantation showing rapid and durable engraftment, irrespectively of the stem cell mobilization regimen used. The addition of plerixafor in an immediate rescue model is efficient and safe after both, G-CSF and chemomobilization and results in extremely high success rates. Whether the differences in graft composition have a clinical impact on engraftment kinetics, immunologic recovery, and graft durability have to be analysed in larger prospective studies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Premedicación / Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas / Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética / Compuestos Heterocíclicos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Apher Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Premedicación / Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas / Movilización de Célula Madre Hematopoyética / Compuestos Heterocíclicos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Apher Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria