Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Immediate Continence Rates in RALRP: A Comparison of Three Techniques.
Tugcu, Volkan; Sener, Nevzat Can; Sahin, Selcuk; Sevinc, Cuneyd; Eksi, Mithat; Yavuzsan, Abdullah Hizir; Tasci, Ali Ihsan.
Afiliación
  • Tugcu V; Department of Urology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Sener NC; Department of Urology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Sahin S; Department of Urology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Sevinc C; Department of Urology, Medicana Beylikduzu International Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Eksi M; Department of Urology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Yavuzsan AH; Department of Urology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Tasci AI; Department of Urology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
JSLS ; 20(4)2016.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27777500
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) is said to provide excellent long-term continence. In this study, we compared the early incontinence outcomes of our patients, who had undergone no reconstruction, posterior reconstruction only, or total anatomic restoration and posterior reconstruction.

METHODS:

We retrospectively analyzed the patients who underwent RALRP for localized prostate cancer by a single surgeon in our clinic from January 1, 2009-February 1, 2016. Continence was defined as no leakage or use of a safety pad for minimal leakage. The main outcome measure was continence at postoperative week 1 and months 1, 6, and 12.

RESULTS:

Between 2009 and 2016, 239 patients underwent RALRP for localized prostate disease. Seventy-four patients underwent a standard approach (group 1), 88 had posterior reconstruction (group 2), and 77 had posterior reconstruction with total anatomic restoration (group 3). After 1 week, 24.3% of the patients in group 1 (18/74), 31.8% in group 2 (28/88), and 45.8% in group 3 (33/72) were continent (P = .02). One month after the surgery, continence rates for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 56.7, 67, and 75%, respectively (0.065). After 6 and 12 months, continence rates for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 72.9 and 87.8%, 81.8 and 89.7%, and 84.7 and 91.6%, respectively (P = .178 and .7484).

CONCLUSION:

Anatomic restoration improves continence rates in the early period after RALRP. Even though other parameters were higher in the total restoration group, immediate continence (at 1 week) was significantly better.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostatectomía / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Incontinencia Urinaria / Micción / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JSLS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Prostatectomía / Neoplasias de la Próstata / Incontinencia Urinaria / Micción / Laparoscopía Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: JSLS Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Turquía