Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Autoreject: Automated artifact rejection for MEG and EEG data.
Jas, Mainak; Engemann, Denis A; Bekhti, Yousra; Raimondo, Federico; Gramfort, Alexandre.
Afiliación
  • Jas M; LTCI, Télécom ParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, France. Electronic address: mainak.jas@telecom-paristech.fr.
  • Engemann DA; Parietal project-team, INRIA Saclay - Ile de France, France; Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Neurospin, CEA DSV/I2BM, INSERM, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, 91191 Gif/Yvette, France; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, PICNIC Lab, F-75013, Paris, France.
  • Bekhti Y; LTCI, Télécom ParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, France.
  • Raimondo F; Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière, ICM, PICNIC Lab, F-75013, Paris, France; Laboratorio de Inteligencia Artificial Aplicada, Departamento de Computación, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; CONICET, Argentina; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-
  • Gramfort A; LTCI, Télécom ParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, France.
Neuroimage ; 159: 417-429, 2017 10 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28645840
ABSTRACT
We present an automated algorithm for unified rejection and repair of bad trials in magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Our method capitalizes on cross-validation in conjunction with a robust evaluation metric to estimate the optimal peak-to-peak threshold - a quantity commonly used for identifying bad trials in M/EEG. This approach is then extended to a more sophisticated algorithm which estimates this threshold for each sensor yielding trial-wise bad sensors. Depending on the number of bad sensors, the trial is then repaired by interpolation or by excluding it from subsequent analysis. All steps of the algorithm are fully automated thus lending itself to the name Autoreject. In order to assess the practical significance of the algorithm, we conducted extensive validation and comparisons with state-of-the-art methods on four public datasets containing MEG and EEG recordings from more than 200 subjects. The comparisons include purely qualitative efforts as well as quantitatively benchmarking against human supervised and semi-automated preprocessing pipelines. The algorithm allowed us to automate the preprocessing of MEG data from the Human Connectome Project (HCP) going up to the computation of the evoked responses. The automated nature of our method minimizes the burden of human inspection, hence supporting scalability and reliability demanded by data analysis in modern neuroscience.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Algoritmos / Encéfalo / Magnetoencefalografía / Artefactos / Electroencefalografía Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Algoritmos / Encéfalo / Magnetoencefalografía / Artefactos / Electroencefalografía Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroimage Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article