Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Percutaneous Image-Guided Cryoablation of Hepatic Tumors: Single-Center Experience With Intermediate to Long-Term Outcomes.
Glazer, Daniel I; Tatli, Servet; Shyn, Paul B; Vangel, Mark G; Tuncali, Kemal; Silverman, Stuart G.
Afiliación
  • Glazer DI; 1 Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
  • Tatli S; 2 Department of Radiology, Medical Imaging of Lehigh Valley, Allentown, PA.
  • Shyn PB; 1 Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
  • Vangel MG; 3 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Tuncali K; 1 Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
  • Silverman SG; 1 Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 209(6): 1381-1389, 2017 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28952807
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this article is to report our intermediate to long-term outcomes with image-guided percutaneous hepatic tumor cryoablation and to evaluate its technical success, technique efficacy, local tumor progression, and adverse event rate. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Between 1998 and 2014, 299 hepatic tumors (243 metastases and 56 primary tumors; mean diameter, 2.5 cm; median diameter, 2.2 cm; range, 0.3-7.8 cm) in 186 patients (95 women; mean age, 60.9 years; range, 29-88 years) underwent cryoablation during 236 procedures using CT (n = 126), MRI (n = 100), or PET/CT (n = 10) guidance. Technical success, technique efficacy at 3 months, local tumor progression (mean follow-up, 2.5 years; range, 2 months to 14.6 years), and adverse event rates were calculated.

RESULTS:

The technical success rate was 94.6% (279/295). The technique efficacy rate was 89.5% (231/258) and was greater for tumors smaller than 4 cm (93.4%; 213/228) than for larger tumors (60.0%; 18/30) (p < 0.0001). Local tumor progression occurred in 23.3% (60/258) of tumors and was significantly more common after the treatment of tumors 4 cm or larger (63.3%; 19/30) compared with smaller tumors (18.0%; 41/228) (p < 0.0001). Adverse events followed 33.8% (80/236) of procedures and were grade 3-5 in 10.6% (25/236) of cases. Grade 3 or greater adverse events more commonly followed the treatment of larger tumors (19.5%; 8/41) compared with smaller tumors (8.7%; 17/195) (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION:

Image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of hepatic tumors is efficacious; however, tumors smaller than 4 cm are more likely to be treated successfully and without an adverse event.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiografía Intervencional / Criocirugía / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Radiografía Intervencional / Criocirugía / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article