Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
From therapeutic landscapes to healthy spaces, places and practices: A scoping review.
Bell, Sarah L; Foley, Ronan; Houghton, Frank; Maddrell, Avril; Williams, Allison M.
Afiliación
  • Bell SL; European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, TR1 3AE, Cornwall, UK. Electronic address: Sarah.Bell@exeter.ac.uk.
  • Foley R; Department of Geography, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland. Electronic address: ronan.foley@nuim.ie.
  • Houghton F; College of Health Science & Public Health, Eastern Washington University, Spokane, WA, USA. Electronic address: fhoughton@ewu.edu.
  • Maddrell A; School of Archaeology, Geography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK. Electronic address: avril.maddrell@reading.ac.uk.
  • Williams AM; School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Canada. Electronic address: awill@mcmaster.ca.
Soc Sci Med ; 196: 123-130, 2018 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29175701
ABSTRACT
The term 'therapeutic landscapes' was first coined by health geographer, Wilbert Gesler, in 1992 to explore why certain environments seem to contribute to a healing sense of place. Since then, the concept and its applications have evolved and expanded as researchers have examined the dynamic material, affective and socio-cultural roots and routes to experiences of health and wellbeing in specific places. Drawing on a scoping review of studies of these wider therapeutic landscapes published between 2007 and 2016, this paper explores how, where, and to what benefit the 'therapeutic landscapes' concept has been applied to date, and how such applications have contributed to its critical evolution as a relevant and useful concept in health geography. Building on themes included in two earlier (1999, 2007) edited volumes on Therapeutic Landscapes, we summarise the key themes identified in the review, broadly in keeping with the core material, social, spiritual and symbolic dimensions of the concept initially posited by Gesler. Through this process, we identify strengths and limitations of the concept and its applications, as well as knowledge gaps and promising future directions for work in this field, reflecting critically on its value within health geography and its potential contribution to wider interdisciplinary discussions and debates around 'healthy' spaces, places, and related practices.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ambiente / Geografía Médica Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ambiente / Geografía Médica Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Soc Sci Med Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article