Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Assessing Commutability Part 3: Using the Calibration Effectiveness of a Reference Material.
Budd, Jeffrey R; Weykamp, Cas; Rej, Robert; MacKenzie, Finlay; Ceriotti, Ferruccio; Greenberg, Neil; Camara, Johanna E; Schimmel, Heinz; Vesper, Hubert W; Keller, Thomas; Delatour, Vincent; Panteghini, Mauro; Burns, Chris; Miller, W Greg.
Afiliación
  • Budd JR; Beckman Coulter, Chaska, MN.
  • Weykamp C; Queen Beatrix Hospital, Winterswijk, the Netherlands.
  • Rej R; Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, and School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY.
  • MacKenzie F; Birmingham Quality/UK NEQAS, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Ceriotti F; Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
  • Greenberg N; Neil Greenberg Consulting, LLC, Rochester, NY.
  • Camara JE; National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
  • Schimmel H; European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate F, Geel, Belgium.
  • Vesper HW; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Keller T; ACOMED statistic, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Delatour V; Laboratoire national de métrologie et d'essais (LNE), Paris, France.
  • Panteghini M; Research Centre for Metrological Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (CIRME), University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • Burns C; National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, A Centre of the MHRA, Hertfordshire, UK.
  • Miller WG; Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. gmiller@vcu.edu.
Clin Chem ; 64(3): 465-474, 2018 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29348164
ABSTRACT
A process is described to assess the commutability of a reference material (RM) intended for use as a calibrator based on its ability to fulfill its intended use in a calibration traceability scheme to produce equivalent clinical sample (CS) results among different measurement procedures (MPs) for the same measurand. Three sources of systematic error are elucidated in the context of creating the calibration model for translating MP signals to measurand amounts calibration fit, calibrator level trueness, and commutability. An example set of 40 CS results from 7 MPs is used to illustrate estimation of bias and variability for each MP. The candidate RM is then used to recalibrate each MP, and its effectiveness in reducing the systematic error among the MPs within an acceptable level of equivalence based on medical requirements confirms its commutability for those MPs. The RM is declared noncommutable for MPs for which, after recalibration, the CS results do not agree with those from other MPs. When a lack of agreement is found, other potential causes, including lack of calibration fit, should be investigated before concluding the RM is noncommutable. The RM is considered fit for purpose for those MPs where commutability is demonstrated.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estándares de Referencia / Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chem Asunto de la revista: QUIMICA CLINICA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Mongolia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estándares de Referencia / Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chem Asunto de la revista: QUIMICA CLINICA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Mongolia