Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of a colorectal enhanced recovery program implementation on clinical outcomes and institutional costs: A prospective cohort study with retrospective control.
Portinari, Mattia; Ascanelli, Simona; Targa, Simone; Dos Santos Valgode, Elisabete Maria; Bonvento, Barbara; Vagnoni, Emidia; Camerani, Stefano; Verri, Marco; Volta, Carlo Alberto; Feo, Carlo V.
Afiliación
  • Portinari M; Department of Morphology, Surgery, and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: mattia.portinari@unife.it.
  • Ascanelli S; Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: simona.ascanelli@unife.it.
  • Targa S; Department of Morphology, Surgery, and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: simone.targa@unife.it.
  • Dos Santos Valgode EM; Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: e.santos@ospfe.it.
  • Bonvento B; Department of Economy and Management, University of Ferrara, Via Voltapaletto 11, 44121 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: bonventob@libero.it.
  • Vagnoni E; Department of Economy and Management, University of Ferrara, Via Voltapaletto 11, 44121 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: emidia.vagnoni@unife.it.
  • Camerani S; Department of Anesthesiology, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: s.camerani@ospfe.it.
  • Verri M; Department of Anesthesiology, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: marco.verri@unife.it.
  • Volta CA; Department of Morphology, Surgery, and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; Department of Anesthesiology, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: carloalberto.volta@unife.it.
  • Feo CV; Department of Morphology, Surgery, and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124 Ferrara, Italy. Electronic address: cvfeo@unife.it.
Int J Surg ; 53: 206-213, 2018 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29548700
BACKGROUND: The enhanced recovery program for perioperative care of the surgical patient reduces postoperative metabolic response and organ dysfunction, accelerating functional recovery. The aim of this study was to determine the impact on postoperative recovery and cost-effectiveness of implementing a colorectal enhanced recovery program in an Italian academic centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective series of consecutive patients (N = 100) undergoing elective colorectal resection completing a standardized enhanced recovery program in 2013-2015 (ERP group) was compared to patients (N = 100) operated at the same institution in 2010-2011 (Pre-ERP group) before introducing the program. The exclusion criteria were: >80 years old, ASA score of IV, a stage IV TNM, and diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay which was used as a proxy of functional recovery. Secondary outcomes included: postoperative complications, 30-day readmission and mortality, protocol adherence, nursing workload, cost-effectiveness, and factors predicting prolonged hospital stay. The ERP group patient satisfaction was also evaluated. RESULTS: Hospital stay was significantly reduced in the ERP versus the Pre-ERP group (4 versus 8 days) as well as nursing workload, with no increase in postoperative complications, 30-day readmission or mortality. ERP group protocol adherence (81%) and patient satisfaction were high. Conventional perioperative protocol was the only independent predictor of prolonged hospital stay. Total mean direct costs per patient were significantly higher in the Pre-ERP versus the ERP group (6796.76 versus 5339.05 euros). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a colorectal enhanced recovery program is feasible, efficient for functional recovery and hospital stay reduction, safe, and cost-effective. High patient satisfaction and nursing workload reduction may also be expected, but high protocol adherence is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Perioperativa / Enfermedades Intestinales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Surg Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Atención Perioperativa / Enfermedades Intestinales Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Sysrev_observational_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Int J Surg Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article