Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A five-CpG DNA methylation score to predict metastatic-lethal outcomes in men treated with radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Zhao, Shanshan; Leonardson, Amy; Geybels, Milan S; McDaniel, Andrew S; Yu, Ming; Kolb, Suzanne; Zong, Hong; Carter, Kelly; Siddiqui, Javed; Cheng, Anqi; Wright, Jonathan L; Pritchard, Colin C; Lance, Raymond; Troyer, Dean; Fan, Jian-Bing; Ostrander, Elaine A; Dai, James Y; Tomlins, Scott A; Feng, Ziding; Stanford, Janet L.
Afiliación
  • Zhao S; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina.
  • Leonardson A; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Geybels MS; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • McDaniel AS; Department of Epidemiology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Yu M; Departments of Pathology and Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Kolb S; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Zong H; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Carter K; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Siddiqui J; Division of Clinical Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Cheng A; Departments of Pathology and Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Wright JL; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Pritchard CC; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Lance R; Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
  • Troyer D; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
  • Fan JB; Department of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
  • Ostrander EA; Departments of Pathology, Microbiology, and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia.
  • Dai JY; Department of Oncology, Illumina, Inc., San Diego, California.
  • Tomlins SA; Cancer Genetics and Comparative Genomics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Feng Z; Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
  • Stanford JL; Departments of Pathology and Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Prostate ; 2018 Jun 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29956356
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Prognostic biomarkers for localized prostate cancer (PCa) could improve personalized medicine. Our group previously identified a panel of differentially methylated CpGs in primary tumor tissue that predict disease aggressiveness, and here we further validate these biomarkers.

METHODS:

Pyrosequencing was used to assess CpG methylation of eight biomarkers previously identified using the HumanMethylation450 array; CpGs with strongly correlated (r >0.70) results were considered technically validated. Logistic regression incorporating the validated CpGs and Gleason sum was used to define and lock a final model to stratify men with metastatic-lethal versus non-recurrent PCa in a training dataset. Coefficients from the final model were then used to construct a DNA methylation score, which was evaluated by logistic regression and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analyses in an independent testing dataset.

RESULTS:

Five CpGs were technically validated and all were retained (P < 0.05) in the final model. The 5-CpG and Gleason sum coefficients were used to calculate a methylation score, which was higher in men with metastatic-lethal progression (P = 6.8 × 10-6 ) in the testing dataset. For each unit increase in the score there was a four-fold increase in risk of metastatic-lethal events (odds ratio, OR = 4.0, 95%CI = 1.8-14.3). At 95% specificity, sensitivity was 74% for the score compared to 53% for Gleason sum alone. The score demonstrated better prediction performance (AUC = 0.91; pAUC = 0.037) compared to Gleason sum alone (AUC = 0.87; pAUC = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS:

The DNA methylation score improved upon Gleason sum for predicting metastatic-lethal progression and holds promise for risk stratification of men with aggressive tumors. This prognostic score warrants further evaluation as a tool for improving patient outcomes.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Prostate Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article