Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized clinical trial of the effectiveness of 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot orthodontic bracket systems: part 1-duration of treatment.
Yassir, Yassir A; El-Angbawi, Ahmed M; McIntyre, Grant T; Revie, Gavin F; Bearn, David R.
Afiliación
  • Yassir YA; Orthodontic Department, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, UK.
  • El-Angbawi AM; Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
  • McIntyre GT; Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Revie GF; Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Bearn DR; Orthodontic Department, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
Eur J Orthod ; 41(2): 133-142, 2019 03 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30007300
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare treatment duration between 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot systems and determine factors influencing treatment duration. SUBJECTS AND

METHODS:

Eligible participants aged 12 years or over were allocated to the 0.018-inch or 0.022-inch slot MBT appliance (3M-Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) using block randomization in groups of 10. Outcome measures included duration of 1. overall treatment, 2. levelling and alignment, 3. working and finishing, and 4. appointment numbers and other treatment-related factors. Parametric tests (independent samples t-test) and non-parametric tests (chi-square with Fisher's exact tests and Mann-Whitney U-test) assessed differences between groups. A multiple linear regression analysis identified factors influencing treatment duration (P < 0.05).

RESULTS:

Of the 187 participants randomized (11 ratio), 34 withdrew or were excluded (protocol deviations or poor cooperation). There were 77 patients in the 0.018-inch slot group and 76 patients in the 0.022-inch slot group (overall mean age 19.1 years). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (P > 0.05). The mean duration of treatment for the 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot groups was 29.3 and 31.2 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in terms of treatment duration, duration of the key stages of treatment, and number of appointments (P > 0.05). The regression analysis revealed 33.0 per cent of variance in treatment duration was explained by age at bonding, Class II division 2 malocclusion, number of failed appointments, number of emergency appointments, and transfer to another clinician. There were no adverse events.

LIMITATIONS:

It was impossible to blind clinicians or patients to allocation and oral hygiene and periodontal outcomes were not assessed.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no statistically or clinically significant difference in treatment duration between 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems. Increasing patient age, Class II division 2 malocclusion, number of failed and emergency appointments, and multi-operator treatment all increase orthodontic treatment duration. REGISTRATION The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 5 March 2014, registration number NCT02080338. PROTOCOL The protocol was published at DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-389.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortodoncia Correctiva / Soportes Ortodóncicos / Maloclusión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthod Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ortodoncia Correctiva / Soportes Ortodóncicos / Maloclusión Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthod Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido