Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Insights into venous thromboembolism prevention in hospitalized cancer patients: Lessons from a prospective study.
Figueroa, Rocío; Alfonso, Ana; López-Picazo, José; Gil-Bazo, Ignacio; García-Mouriz, Alberto; Hermida, José; Páramo, José Antonio; Lecumberri, Ramón.
Afiliación
  • Figueroa R; Hematology Service, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Alfonso A; Hematology Service, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • López-Picazo J; Oncology Department, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Gil-Bazo I; Oncology Department, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • García-Mouriz A; Informatics Service, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Hermida J; Centre for Applied Medical Research, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
  • Páramo JA; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER-CV), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
  • Lecumberri R; Hematology Service, University Clinic of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
PLoS One ; 13(8): e0200220, 2018.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30071038
ABSTRACT
Hospitalized cancer patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite current recommendations in clinical guidelines, thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is underused. We performed an observational prospective study to analyse factors influencing prophylaxis use, VTE events and mortality in cancer-hospitalized patients. 1072 consecutive adult cancer patients were included in an University Hospital from April 2014 to February 2017, and followed-up for 30 days after discharge. The rate of LMWH prophylaxis was 67.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64.7% to 70.4%), with a 2.8% rate of VTE events (95% CI 1.9% to 3.9%) and 3.5% rate of major bleeding events (95% CI 2.5% to 4.8%). 80% of VTE events occurred despite appropriate thromboprophylaxis. Overall, 30-day mortality rate was 13.2% (95% CI 11.2% to 15.3%). Active chemotherapy treatment, hospital stay ≥ 4 days, and metastatic disease were associated with a higher use of LMWH. On the contrary, patients with hematologic malignancies, anemia or thrombocytopenia were less prone to receive thromboprophylaxis. The main reasons for not prescribing LMWH prophylaxis were thrombocytopenia (23.9%) and active/recent bleeding (21.8%). The PRETEMED score, used for VTE risk stratification, correlated with 30-day mortality. There is room for improvement in thromboprophylaxis use among hospitalized-cancer patients, especially among those with hematologic malignancies. A relevant number of VTE events occurred despite prophylaxis with LMWH. Therefore, identification of risk factors for thromboprophylaxis failure is needed.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tromboembolia Venosa / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tromboembolia Venosa / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España