Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Equivalency of beam scan data collection using a 1D tank and automated couch movements to traditional 3D tank measurements.
Knutson, Nels C; Schmidt, Matthew C; Belley, Matthew D; Nguyen, Ngoc; Price, Michael; Mutic, Sasa; Sajo, Erno; Li, H Harold.
Afiliación
  • Knutson NC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
  • Schmidt MC; Medical Physics Program, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01852, USA.
  • Belley MD; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
  • Nguyen N; Medical Physics Program, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, 01852, USA.
  • Price M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
  • Mutic S; Education Department, Varian Medical Systems, Las Vegas, NV, 89119, USA.
  • Sajo E; Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital, The Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
  • Li HH; Department of Physics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, 02881, USA.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 19(6): 60-67, 2018 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30188009
ABSTRACT
This work shows the feasibility of collecting linear accelerator beam data using just a 1-D water tank and automated couch movements with the goal to maximize the cost effectiveness in resource-limited clinical settings. Two commissioning datasets were acquired (a) using a standard of practice 3D water tank scanning system (3DS) and (b) using a novel technique to translate a commercial TG-51 complaint 1D water tank via automated couch movements (1DS). The Extensible Markup Language (XML) was used to dynamically move the linear accelerator couch position (and thus the 1D tank) during radiation delivery for the acquisition of inline, crossline, and diagonal profiles. Both the 1DS and 3DS datasets were used to generate beam models (BM1 DS and BM3 DS ) in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). 98.7% of 1DS measured points had a gamma value (2%/2 mm) < 1 when compared with the 3DS. Static jaw defined field and dynamic MLC field dose distribution comparisons for the TPS beam models BM1 DS and BM3 DS had 3D gamma values (2%/2 mm) < 1 for all 24,900,000 data points tested and >99.5% pass rate with gamma value (1%/1 mm) < 1. In conclusion, automated couch motions and a 1D scanning tank were used to collect commissioning beam data with accuracy comparable to traditionally acquired data using a 3D scanning system. TPS beam models generated directly from 1DS measured data were clinically equivalent to a model derived from 3DS data.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aceleradores de Partículas / Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Recolección de Datos / Fantasmas de Imagen / Errores de Configuración en Radioterapia / Movimiento / Neoplasias Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aceleradores de Partículas / Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Recolección de Datos / Fantasmas de Imagen / Errores de Configuración en Radioterapia / Movimiento / Neoplasias Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Asunto de la revista: BIOFISICA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos