Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detailed comparison between the wall thickness and voltages in chronic myocardial infarction.
Takigawa, Masateru; Martin, Ruairidh; Cheniti, Ghassen; Kitamura, Takeshi; Vlachos, Konstantinos; Frontera, Antonio; Martin, Claire A; Bourier, Felix; Lam, Anna; Pillois, Xavier; Duchateau, Josselin; Klotz, Nicolas; Pambrun, Thomas; Denis, Arnaud; Derval, Nicolas; Hocini, Mélèze; Haïssaguerre, Michel; Sacher, Frédéric; Jaïs, Pierre; Cochet, Hubert.
Afiliación
  • Takigawa M; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Martin R; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Cheniti G; Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
  • Kitamura T; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Vlachos K; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Frontera A; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Martin CA; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Bourier F; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Lam A; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Pillois X; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Duchateau J; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Klotz N; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Pambrun T; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Denis A; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Derval N; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Hocini M; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Haïssaguerre M; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Sacher F; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Jaïs P; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
  • Cochet H; Bordeaux University Hospital (CHU), Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Stimulation Team, IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 30(2): 195-204, 2019 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30288836
BACKGROUND: The relationship between the local electrograms (EGMs) and wall thickness (WT) heterogeneity within infarct scars has not been thoroughly described. The relationship between WT and voltages and substrates for ventricular tachycardia (VT) was examined. METHODS: In 12 consecutive patients with myocardial infarction and VT, WT, defined by a multidetector computed tomography, and voltage were compared. In multicomponent EGMs, amplitudes of both far- and near-field components were manually measured, and the performance of the three-dimensional-mapping system automatic voltage measurement was assessed. RESULTS: Of 15 748 points acquired, 2677 points within 5 mm of the endocardial surface were analyzed. In total, 909 (34.0%) multicomponent EGMs were identified; 785 (86.4%) and 883 (97.1%) were distributed in the WT less than 4 and 5 mm, respectively. Far-field EGM voltages increased linearly from 0.14 mV (0.08-0.28 mV) in the WT: 0 to 1 mm to 0.70 mV (0.43-2.62 mV) in the WT: 4 to 5 mm (ρ = 0.430; P < 0.001), and a significant difference was demonstrated between any two WT-groups (P ≤ 0.001). In contrast, near-field EGM voltages varied from 0.27 mV (0.11-0.44 mV) in the WT: 0 to 1 mm to 0.29 mV (0.17-0.53 mV) in the WT: 4 to 5 mm with a poorer correlation (ρ = 0.062, P = 0.04). The proportion of points where the system automatically measured the voltage on near-field EGMs increased from less than 10% in areas of WT: 4 to 5 mm to 50% in areas less than 2 mm. Of 21 VTs observed, seven hemodynamically stable VTs were mapped and terminated in WT: 1 to 4 mm area. CONCLUSIONS: Although far-field voltages gradually increase with the WT, near-field does not. The three-dimensional-mapping system preferentially annotates the near-field components in thinner areas (center of the scar) and the far-field component in thicker areas when building a voltage map. Critical sites of VT are distributed in WT: 1 to 4 mm areas.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Potenciales de Acción / Cicatriz / Taquicardia Ventricular / Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas / Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector / Ventrículos Cardíacos / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Potenciales de Acción / Cicatriz / Taquicardia Ventricular / Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas / Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector / Ventrículos Cardíacos / Infarto del Miocardio Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA / FISIOLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia