Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electronic Cigarette Awareness, Use, and Perceptions among Cancer Patients.
Buczek, Erin J; Harrington, Kathleen F; Hendricks, Peter S; Schmalbach, Cecelia E.
Afiliación
  • Buczek EJ; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Harrington KF; Division of Pulmonary, Allergy & Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Hendricks PS; Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Schmalbach CE; Department of Otolaryngology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
OTO Open ; 2(2): 2473974X18774543, 2018.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30480216
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) are an emerging trend, yet little is known about their use in the cancer population. The objectives of this study were (1) to describe characteristics of e-cig use among cancer patients, (2) to define e-cig advertising exposure, and (3) to characterize perceptions of traditional cigarettes versus e-cigs. STUDY

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING:

Comprehensive cancer center. SUBJECTS AND

METHODS:

Inpatient, current smokers with a cancer diagnosis. E-cig exposure and use were defined using descriptive statistics. Wilcoxon rank test was used to compare perceptions between e-cigs and traditional cigarettes.

RESULTS:

A total of 979 patients were enrolled in the study; 39 cancer patients were identified. Most cancer patients were women (59%), with an average age of 53.3 years. Of the patients, 46.2% reported e-cig use, most of which (88.9%) was "experimental or occasional." The primary reason for e-cig use was to aid smoking cessation (66.7%), alternative use in nonsmoking areas (22.2%), and "less risky" cigarette replacement (5.6%). The most common sources for e-cig information were TV (76.9%), stores (48.7%), friends (35.9%), family (30.8%), and newspapers or magazines (12.8%). Compared with cigarettes, e-cigs were viewed as posing a reduced health risk (P < .001) and conferring a less negative social impression (P < .001). They were also viewed as less likely to satisfy nicotine cravings (P = .002), to relieve boredom (P = .0005), to have a calming effect (P < .001), and as tasting pleasant (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS:

E-cig use and advertising exposure are common among cancer patients. E-cig use is perceived as healthier and more socially acceptable but less likely to produce a number of desired consequences of cigarette use.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: OTO Open Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: OTO Open Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos