Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Design and evaluation of a clinical competency committee.
Duitsman, Marrigje E; Fluit, Cornelia R M G; van Alfen-van der Velden, Janiëlle A E M; de Visser, Marieke; Ten Kate-Booij, Marianne; Dolmans, Diana H J M; Jaarsma, Debbie A D C; de Graaf, Jacqueline.
Afiliación
  • Duitsman ME; Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Marloes.Duitsman@radboudumc.nl.
  • Fluit CRMG; Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van Alfen-van der Velden JAEM; Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • de Visser M; Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Ten Kate-Booij M; Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dolmans DHJM; Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Jaarsma DADC; University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • de Graaf J; Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Perspect Med Educ ; 8(1): 1-8, 2019 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30656533
INTRODUCTION: In postgraduate medical education, group decision-making has emerged as an essential tool to evaluate the clinical progress of residents. Clinical competency committees (CCCs) have been set up to ensure informed decision-making and provide feedback regarding performance of residents. Despite this important task, it remains unclear how CCCs actually function in practice and how their performance should be evaluated. METHODS: In the prototyping phase of a design-based approach, a CCC meeting was developed, using three theoretical design principles: (1) data from multiple assessment tools and multiple perspectives, (2) a shared mental model and (3) structured discussions. The meetings were held in a university children's hospital and evaluated using observations, interviews with CCC members and an open-ended questionnaire among residents. RESULTS: The structured discussions during the meetings provided a broad outline of resident performance, including identification of problematic and excellent residents. A shared mental model about the assessment criteria had developed over time. Residents were not always satisfied with the feedback they received after the meeting. Feedback that had been provided to a resident after the first CCC meeting was not addressed in the second meeting. DISCUSSION: The principles that were used to design the CCC meeting were feasible in practice. Structured discussions, based on data from multiple assessment tools and multiple perspectives, provided a broad outline of resident performance. Residency programs that wish to implement CCCs can build on our design principles and adjust the prototype to their particular context. When running a CCC, it is important to consider feedback that has been provided to a resident after the previous meeting and to evaluate whether it has improved the resident's performance.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud / Competencia Clínica / Miembro de Comité / Retroalimentación / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Perspect Med Educ Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud / Competencia Clínica / Miembro de Comité / Retroalimentación / Toma de Decisiones Clínicas Tipo de estudio: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Perspect Med Educ Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos