Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The current state of the transanal approach to the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.
de Lacy, F Borja; Keller, Deborah Susan; Martin-Perez, Beatriz; Emile, Sameh Hany; Chand, Manish; Spinelli, Antonino; Lacy, Antonio M.
Afiliación
  • de Lacy FB; Department of Surgery, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. bdelacy@aischannel.com.
  • Keller DS; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Martin-Perez B; Department of Surgery, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Emile SH; General Surgery Department, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt.
  • Chand M; Department of Gastroenterological Intervention, University College London, City of London, UK.
  • Spinelli A; Division Colon and Rectal Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University Rozzano Milano, Milano, Italy.
  • Lacy AM; Department of Surgery, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Surg Endosc ; 33(5): 1368-1375, 2019 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30675660
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The transanal approach to pelvic dissection has gained considerable traction and utilization continues to expand, fueled by the transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer. The same principles and benefits of transanal pelvic dissection may apply to the transanal restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA)-the TaPouch procedure. Our goal was to review the literature to date on the development and current state of the TaPouch. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We performed a PubMed database search for original articles on transanal pelvic dissections, IPAA, and the TaPouch procedure, with a manual search from relevant citations in the reference list. The main outcomes were the technical aspects of the TaPouch, clinical and functional outcomes, and potential advantages, drawbacks, and future direction for the procedure.

RESULTS:

The conduct of the procedure has been defined, with the safety and feasibility demonstrated in small series. The reported rates of conversion and anastomotic leakage are low. There are no randomized trials or large-scale comparative studies available for comparative effectiveness compared to the traditional IPAA.

CONCLUSIONS:

The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is an exciting adaption of the transanal total mesorectal excision for refining the technical steps of a complex operation. Additional experience is needed for comparative outcomes and defining the ideal training and implementation pathways.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Proctocolectomía Restauradora Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias del Recto / Proctocolectomía Restauradora Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España