Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Addressing the affordability of cancer drugs: using deliberative public engagement to inform health policy.
Bentley, Colene; Peacock, Stuart; Abelson, Julia; Burgess, Michael M; Demers-Payette, Olivier; Longstaff, Holly; Tripp, Laura; Lavis, John N; Wilson, Michael G.
Afiliación
  • Bentley C; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1L3, Canada. cbentley@bccrc.ca.
  • Peacock S; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1L3, Canada.
  • Abelson J; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West (CRL 203), Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
  • Burgess MM; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 239 RHS, 1088 Discovery Avenue, Kelowna, British Columbia, V1V 1V7, Canada.
  • Demers-Payette O; Institute National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services Sociaux (INESSS), 2021 avenue Union, 12th Floor, bureau 1200, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2S9, Canada.
  • Longstaff H; Engage Associates Consulting Firm, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Tripp L; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West (CRL 203), Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
  • Lavis JN; McMaster Health Forum, 1280 Main Street West, MML-417, Ontario, Hamilton, L8S 4L6, Canada.
  • Wilson MG; McMaster Health Forum, 1280 Main Street West, MML-417, Ontario, Hamilton, L8S 4L6, Canada.
Health Res Policy Syst ; 17(1): 17, 2019 Feb 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30732616
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Health system expenditure on cancer drugs is rising rapidly in many OECD countries given the costly new treatments and increased rates of use due to a growing and ageing population. These factors put considerable strain on the sustainability of health systems worldwide, sparking public debate among clinicians, pharmaceutical companies, policy-makers and citizens on issues of affordability and equity. We engaged Canadians through a series of deliberative public engagement events to determine their priorities for making cancer drug funding decisions fair and sustainable in Canada's publicly financed health system.

METHODS:

An approach to deliberation was developed based on the McMaster Health Forum's citizen panels and the established Burgess and O'Doherty model of deliberative public engagement. Six deliberations were held across Canada in 2016. Transcripts were coded in NVivo and analysed to determine where participants' views converged and diverged. Recommendations were grouped thematically.

RESULTS:

A total of 115 Canadians participated in the deliberative events and developed 86 recommendations. Recommendations included the review and regular re-review of approved drugs using 'real-world' evidence on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness; prioritisation of treatments that restore patients' independence, mental health and general well-being; ensuring that decision processes, results and their rationales are transparent; and commitment to people with similar needs receiving the same care regardless of where in Canada they live.

CONCLUSIONS:

The next steps for policy-makers should be to develop mechanisms for (1) re-reviewing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness data for all cancer drugs; (2) making disinvestments in cancer drugs that satisfy requirements relating to grandfathering and compassionate access; (3) ensuring fair and equitable access to cancer drugs for all Canadians; and (4) fostering a pan-Canadian approach to cancer drug funding decisions.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Opinión Pública / Actitud / Gastos en Salud / Participación de la Comunidad / Política de Salud / Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Health Res Policy Syst Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Opinión Pública / Actitud / Gastos en Salud / Participación de la Comunidad / Política de Salud / Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Health Res Policy Syst Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá