Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does regulation increase the rate at which doctors leave practice? Analysis of routine hospital data in the English NHS following the introduction of medical revalidation.
Gutacker, Nils; Bloor, Karen; Bojke, Chris; Archer, Julian; Walshe, Kieran.
Afiliación
  • Gutacker N; Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK. nils.gutacker@york.ac.uk.
  • Bloor K; Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
  • Bojke C; Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Archer J; Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research Assessment, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
  • Walshe K; Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMC Med ; 17(1): 33, 2019 02 11.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30744639
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

In 2012, the UK introduced medical revalidation, whereby to retain their licence all doctors are required to show periodically that they are up to date and fit to practise medicine. Early reports suggested that some doctors found the process overly onerous and chose to leave practice. This study investigates the effect of medical revalidation on the rate at which consultants (senior hospital doctors) leave NHS practice, and assesses any differences between the performance of consultants who left or remained in practice before and after the introduction of revalidation.

METHODS:

We used a retrospective cohort of administrative data from the Hospital Episode Statistics database on all consultants who were working in English NHS hospitals between April 2008 and March 2009 (n = 19,334), followed to March 2015. Proportional hazard models were used to identify the effect of medical revalidation on the time to exit from the NHS workforce, as implied by ceasing NHS clinical activity. The main exposure variable was consultants' time-varying revalidation status, which differentiates between periods when consultants were (a) not subject to revalidation-before the policy was introduced, (b) awaiting a revalidation recommendation and (c) had received a positive recommendation to be revalidated. Difference-in-differences analysis was used to compare the performance of those who left practice with those who remained in practice before and after the introduction of revalidation, as proxied by case-mix-adjusted 30-day mortality rates.

RESULTS:

After 2012, consultants who had not yet revalidated were at an increased hazard of ceasing NHS clinical practice (HR 2.33, 95% CI 2.12 to 2.57) compared with pre-policy levels. This higher risk remained after a positive recommendation (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.06) but was statistically significantly reduced (p < 0.001). We found no statistically significant differences in mortality rates between those consultants who ceased practice and those who remained, after adjustment for multiple testing.

CONCLUSION:

Revalidation appears to have led to greater numbers of doctors ceasing clinical practice, over and above other contemporaneous influences. Those ceasing clinical practice do not appear to have provided lower quality care, as approximated by mortality rates, when compared with those remaining in practice.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Medicina Estatal / Competencia Clínica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Médicos / Medicina Estatal / Competencia Clínica Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido